Before diving into the subject, I find myself obliged to clarify a few aspects regarding how two types of quotation marks are used in this argumentation and in all writings under the umbrella of The Letters of Salem. Specifically, only two types of quotation marks are used, aiming to highlight two statements that, at first glance, appear identical, but are in reality diametrically opposed. Thus, whenever a word is in “regular quotation marks”, when it is not a direct quote, these quotation marks emphasize a falsehood, a myth, or a misconception about the subject.

On the other hand, whenever a word or phrase is in this type of quotation marks, it highlights a truth or the correct and original version of the subject, meaning the absolute and initial sense, the sense of origin. For example, there is a major difference between a “truth” (what is generally considered to be truth) and truth (a revealed truth, which might not be popular at all at this moment). The context will make it clearer what I mean; the core idea is that in all writings signed The Letters of Salem, these two types of quotation marks are used in an unconventional way for this type of quotation marks, and it is well to take into account this technical drafting aspect.

Diving into the subject, from the very beginning I find myself obliged to emphasize that this will be an unconventional, unpopular, shocking approach, yet entirely true, properly argued on the matter. On the other hand, not everyone will be able to understand what will be debated in what follows.

The misunderstanding of some is a reality that cannot be changed; it is something that stems from the inner nature of the individual, something that separates all of humanity into exactly two categories of people, something that has been from the beginning and will remain until the very last moment of history... even more so, the final moments of history will highlight to the maximum, more than ever in history, this differentiation through contrast between these two distinct categories of people. The development of the subject will increasingly clarify exactly what I am referring to.

Because the title above, which introduces the upcoming debate, is a paraphrasing of a statement made by a religious man, I feel once again obliged to provide a few clarifications. This is because this article has as its primary target audience those individuals who consider themselves religious, and being a theological approach, it primarily addresses those who find themselves, within their religious concepts, in one of the three religions that originate from the Scriptures revealed through prophets; and within this categorization are found Jews, Christians, and Muslims... of course, anyone is invited to read, but out of the two major categories of people in which all of humanity is included, only one category of people will understand, and that is normal... so it was prophesied to be, and so it is, and so it shall be.

Returning to the title, it is a paraphrasing of a statement made by a man about whom, at this moment, the three categories of religious groups (mentioned above) hold different, even diametrically opposed views and convictions, and it does not bother me.

What is important is that regarding this man, who made the statement “whatever you did for one of the least [the insignificant] of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me,” he is seen, “in the lowest common denominator,” as a teacher... and that is enough for the upcoming argumentation. It is enough for me for now that Jews recognize Yeshua as a teacher, that “Christians” also consider him (at least) a teacher, and that Muslims, in turn, view him as being at least a teacher.

It is true that “Christians” see Yeshua as more than a teacher. According to their understanding, I should have written Teacher, as they see in Yeshua infinitely more than a teacher, and I have no problem with this... I ask them to disregard the fact that I do not use capital letters when referring to Yeshua; for a start, I ask them to imagine that I am writing in ancient Hebrew (meaning without capital letters).

On the other hand, I am glad that Muslims see Yeshua as a prophet (even they see him as more, seeing him participating in the final judgment), but for this argumentation, it is enough for me that they too see Yeshua as a teacher from the One-who-Is, just as his contemporaries saw him, some of the scholars of the time and even among the Pharisees, who addressed him at that time with the words: “Teacher, we know that you speak the truth,” “Teacher, we know that you are a teacher come from the One-who-Is.”

Before diving into the subject, I want to ask a question: to whom exactly was Yeshua referring as his brothers in the last days? To Muslims, to Christians, to Jews? Why in the last days? Because the statement was made with regard to the Last Day of judgment! The day when all of humanity will be divided into two categories of people: sheep and goats; wheat and tares. The sheep destined for the fold of the One-who-Is, in the Kingdom; the wheat with the same destination in the barn of the One-who-Is, in the Kingdom, while, at the opposite pole, the place of the goats and the tares will be the final fire, initially conceived in the Plan of the One-who-Is for demons and their leader (the Devil).

Nowadays, everyone claims to have a certain connection with Yeshua. “Christians” call him their Lord and their Teacher; Muslims view him as being one of the greatest prophets, and a judge (participating in the judgment); Jews haven't thrown themselves too heavily into making statements... they even have trouble calling him a brother. The problem with brothers is that you have no choice; when blood, when parents make you a brother, you can't really say absolutely anything anymore; you swallow hard, or you rejoice with your whole being.

Could it be an exaggeration to claim that by “these brothers of mine,” in the context of the last days, Jews are meant? Could the separation of the sheep from the goats and the wheat from the tares be in connection with Jews and anti-Semitism? A bold statement indeed!

What can argue for it? The context of the last days and of the judgment alone would not be enough. Are there internal elements within this parable (prophecy and teaching) that further highlight the fact that these brothers of mine are Jews – not Christians, not Muslims – while all of humanity is placed before two destinies: saved in the Kingdom, or lost in the fire with the demons and the Devil?

The Parable of the Separation was spoken by Yeshua after The Parable of the Expectant-Virgins, after the prophecy regarding the destruction of Jerusalem, and was put into writing by Matthew. This parable (prophecy) has elements in common with The Parable of the Sower.

In all these teachings, the situation of humanity at the end of history is described; in all these parables (prophecies), there is talk of separating the good (or bad) from among the bad (or good), separating those who waited prepared (the wise virgins) from those who waited unprepared (the foolish virgins).

In all these parables, it is about the coming of someone who triggers this separation: in the Parable of the Virgins, someone comes and cries out “Here is the bridegroom!”, in the Parable of the Sower, the angels (messagers) are sent as reapers, gathering the wheat before the sickle prepared for the tares; in the Parable of the Judgment, a son of man is shown coming in glory, accompanied by angels (messengers), seated upon a throne to be a king in glory, saying to the good (sheep and wheat): “Come, you who are blessed by my father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the World (when the wheat was sown by Love upon the Earth)!”

Who is this son of man, who is the bridegroom, who are the angels accompanying him in glory, what is the Kingdom, who are the brothers of the king?

The questions above are in a relationship of correlation. To find the answer for each of them, we must first identify whom Yeshua is referring to as being, at the end of history, the insignificant brothers of the king.

Yeshua intentionally used the adjective “insignificant” when referring to the king's brothers in the Parable of the Judgment. He intentionally left us this clue both for the identification of the king's brothers and for the identity of the king; because both the brothers and the king belong to the same nation or the same human family.

Who is the group of people, the family from the same parents, with a major role in the final events, or, in other words, with a major role at the end of history? Who are those who, in these days, especially in recent years, divide society into two: those who support them (rightfully so), and those who rebuke them (at the very least), on apparently just as “rightful grounds”?

Only a single group of people has achieved this feat, and more so than ever in recent years, humanity is orbiting, more or less blinded, around the Jews – the group that is the most insignificant relative to the world's population, the group that is the most insignificant among those with the Scriptures of the prophets, the group with the smallest palm of land of their own, the most controversial group throughout history; for all the empires that arose had an obsession with them, only to fall one by one, and precisely so that Israel would reach the end of world history, exactly to receive its reward… the one prophesied by all the prophets, including Yeshua.

Generally, there is a huge misconception regarding the relationship between Yeshua and Israel (the group of people descended from Abraham and Sarah, Jacob and Rachel, those descended from their son, those descended from Israel).

It is essential to demystify the relationship between Yeshua and Israel. There is no greater confusion and misconception in the world than on this subject, which is essential for understanding who the mentioned brothers are and who the mentioned king is in The Parable of the Judgment.

Obviously, in order to clarify and to bring the truth to light, we need some trustworthy witnesses, and the most suitable in this regard are the prophets, those confirmed by the One-who-Is.

Was Yeshua a prophet confirmed by the One-who-Is? Some say yes. It is said that while he was in the waters of the Jordan, at his meeting with the prophet John (the son of Zechariah the priest), the Heavens of the One-who-Is were seen opened and a voice was heard from them saying: “This is My beloved son, in whom I find my full pleasure!”… an occasion upon which two categories of people were found: some who heard the words, and others who had the impression that they heard thunder. Both groups were witnesses to something supernatural – at the very least.

Obviously, we need something more than this account of the eyewitnesses on the scene to take into consideration this confirmation of the One-who-Is regarding Yeshua as being a prophet.

On that occasion, many people were present, and from that moment on, a few of John's (the prophet's) close followers began to follow Yeshua; they were among those who had heard the words spoken by the One-who-Is. In addition, the prophet John declared regarding Yeshua: “Behold the Lamb of the One-who-Is who takes away the sins of the World.” – a prophecy that no Jew understood at that moment, just as they did not understand the meaning of the words spoken from Heaven in their hearing.

To understand the relationship between Yeshua and Israel, we must first of all understand Who spoke the words from Heaven, Who expressed Himself as being Father in relation to this Yeshua, called son.

This Father, evidently the One-who-Is, was He a divine novelty at that moment in relation to Israel, or was He the One who in the past chose Abraham, then Isaac, and later Jacob named Israel? I admit, it is a catch question! Why? Because there is a total misconception on this subject. I will clarify the understanding immediately.

It is assumed, “argued” since forever, that the One whom Yeshua referred to as Father is the One revealed in ancient times to be the One-who-Is; however, this statement is false!

When the teacher Yeshua referred to the Father in Heaven, the One heard by the crowd on the occasion when Yeshua was among his own on Earth, he made some statements regarding this Father that aim to highlight an essential truth that is entirely ignored.

Regarding this Father, he said that no man has ever seen or known Him. He said: “No one has ever seen the One-who-Is [this Father].”, “Not that anyone has seen the Father [this Father].”, “I tell you that their angels in Heaven always see the face of My Father [this Father] who is in Heaven.”

In other words, Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Jacob, Moses, and all the prophets of old did not see and did not know this Father; meaning that in ancient times, it was Another who revealed Himself to these people, whom the Scriptures say they met and knew to be the One-who-Is. It is obvious that Adam (at least he!) saw his Creator, who with His own hands shaped him from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.

The commonly accepted understanding is that in ancient times, this Father manifested Himself, which, as Yeshua showed, is a totally erroneous understanding. It is a lie invented by the very father of any lie, meaning the Devil.

Who manifested Himself in ancient times? To the surprise of many, the answer is diametrically opposed and shocking. In ancient times, α-Yeshua manifested Himself; He was the One-who-Is, the One who created Adam, the One who walked with Enoch, the One who saved Noah, the One who chose Abraham, then Isaac, then Jacob, who was converted into Israel.

Before “Christianity,” the first Christians, those who believe in Yeshua and follow Him by keeping His commandments, were Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and all the Jews. The Jews have had a relationship with α-Yeshua millennia before the appearance of the first “Christian,” because they (and into him) were all Jews baptized as they passed through the Red Sea, liberated from bondage; they received the Law from α-Yeshua, and to them were given the promises and the covenant to be the chosen people of α-Yeshua.

This is why it is said that “he came to his own, and his own did not receive him.” Why did they not receive him? They did not receive him because they, the Jews, were expecting someone else – they were expecting a man, not a the One-who-Was descended from Heaven among them, an Emanu-El.

Are the Jews to be condemned for not seeing α-Yeshua in Yeshua? No! Why not? Because there is no clear prophecy given by α-Yeshua through which the Jews were told that α-Yeshua was going to do this – meaning that he would incarnate precisely to be their Saviour.

An equally shocking truth is the fact that Yeshua had no intention of being accepted at that time, of being recognized. Why not? Because he did not want to be placed on the throne of David, because he had come to be placed on the cross of Adam.

On frequent occasions when he referred to himself, Yeshua aimed for his close followers to understand the relationship between himself and the One called by them the Father, the One who manifested Himself in ancient times as the One-who-Is, α-Yeshua. He made great efforts for them to understand that the Father of old was none other than himself come in the flesh among them, which is why he did not come to abolish what he had previously given through Moses and the prophets, but had come to fulfill the prophecies that He Himself had given in ancient times.

He told his close followers, but they did not understand, just as no one understood: “I am in the Father, and the Father is in me,” “The Father is in me, and I am in the Father.” Meaning, the One called by you Father, the One manifested in ancient times as the One-who-Is, I am he, the one who is with you today; He and I are one and the same being, the One of old and the one who is among you today.

On the other hand, he insisted on emphasizing that although the One who brought them out of Egypt, the One who parted the sea so that they could pass through it as on dry land, the One who gave them the Law, the One who descended into the Tabernacle, the One who was their Rock of water in the wilderness, now, in their midst, is stripped of that power and is now doing the works of the Father (this One) who sent him. “The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells [through His Spirit] in me, He does these works of His,” “for the works that the Father has given me to accomplish, the very works that I am doing, bear witness about me that the Father has sent me,” yes, “the works that I do in my Father’s name bear witness about me.”

Through incarnation, α-Yeshua surrendered all the prerogatives of the One-who-Is; Yeshua had become man to the exact same extent that human people were in that generation; he depended entirely on the manifestation of the Father's Spirit (Influence) [the manifestation of the One-who-Is] in him, just as the prophets of old depended entirely on the manifestation of the Spirit of the One-who-Is (of α-Yeshua) through them. If in ancient times the Spirit (Influence) of α-Yeshua manifested through the prophets, now, Yeshua being a man, the Father’s Spirit (Influence) manifested through him, His prophet.

Although Yeshua, born of Mary in Bethlehem of Judea, possessed the Spirit (Influence) of the One-who-Is in him from his mother's womb, even from conception, he received the fullness of the Father's presence (the Spirit of the One-who-Is) at the moment when the One-who-Is (the Father) recognized him as a beloved son – an occasion upon which Yeshua was adopted by the One-who-Is, becoming the Son of God, a vessel for the manifestation of the One-who-Is, a prophet, and a man with a special mission: that of being the Lamb of the One-who-Is, the one who was to atone for the sins of the World.

The Godhead (Elohim) must be seen as a sacred, holy, and supreme Institution in the Universe. Upon the Throne of this Institution, Only-One (Echad) has always reigned as the One-who-Is; always One, not Two, not Three, because the One who revealed Himself to the prophets of old said: “Shema Yisrael, Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai Echad / Hear, O Israel: the One-who-Is is our Love, the One-who-Is is One,” a fact also reminded by Yeshua through the words: “that they may know You, the only true Love.”

Although there is only one Institution of Love, although there is only one Throne, the One-who-Is upon the Throne has not always been – permanently – the same Being; throughout the history of the Universe and, later, of the Earth, Three have manifested, but never at the same time.

There was and is, and there will eternally be a succession of Three upon the Throne of Love – a rotating succession, where, one by one, One after Another, These become the One-who-Is, while the Other Two become, One the One-who-Was, the Other the One-who-Come; thus, α-Yeshua was the One-who-Was, the One-who-Is, the One-who-Come.

In ancient times, α-Yeshua was the One-who-Is. In the present of the incarnation, during the time of Yeshua, the Father (this One) was the One-who-Is, and α-Yeshua (Yeshua) became the One-who-Was (stripped of any of the prerogatives of the One-who-Is). The incarnation of α-Yeshua into Yeshua left the Throne of Love empty – a Throne upon which the Father (this One) installed Himself, One who in the history of the Earth had not manifested Himself as Love until then.

This Father (the Love upon the Throne), on the occasion of the moment at the Jordan, adopted the One-who-Was (stripped of all glory) as Son. Thus, the One-who-Was became a Son, through adoption, through the legal recognition before the entire Universe of a status lost through incarnation.

From a legal standpoint, the man Yeshua had to be raised to the rank of a Son of God (Love), just as Adam was before the fall. Only in this way could Yeshua achieve the salvation, the redemption of the Earth (lost by Adam – a Son of God (Love)) and the redemption of man. Yeshua had to be 100% man, a son of Eve (of Mary, the seed of the woman) and a Son of God (Love) just like Adam.

Yeshua, through adoption, was also recognized as the One-who-Was, and was also declared a Son of Love! Why also a Son of Love (the Throne of the Universe)? Because man was guilty of violating the Law of Love, a Law that stands at the foundation of the Universe, and as a ransom, One equal to the Law had to pay; the exact same value had to be paid – for the wages of violating the Law is one: death.

For redemption, the death of all humanity would not have been enough; for redemption, the death of all cherubim and angels would not have been enough. For redemption, a Son of God had to die, One of the same value as the Law, and, in fact, the Lawgiver himself died – the Same α-Yeshua who gave the Law at Sinai to Israel, the Same α-Yeshua who told man on the day he was made: “in the day that you violate the commandment (not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil), you shall surely die!”

As Redeemer, a Son with all legal rights through the adoption made by the Father (Love), he, the Lawgiver, Yeshua was able to say: “The Father loves me because I lay down my life that I may take it up again. No one takes it from me by force, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have the power to lay it down [Yeshua] and I have the power to take it up again [α-Yeshua]; this is the commandment I have received from my Father.”

For the redemption of the Earth and the redemption of man, the One-who-Is Love was able to adopt One of the Three, One of the other Two. An adopted angel or cherub was not enough for redemption, no other man was enough for redemption.

For redemption, the Father of Adam had to die – α-Yeshua, descended into flesh, through incarnation, born of a woman. This descent of the Lawgiver for the purpose of redemption is described metaphorically (for it could not be otherwise) by the prophet Isaiah through the words:

“Woe to Ari-El – the Lion-of-Love – , to the Lion-of-Love, the city [the human body] where David [α-Yeshua] encamped!… I will distress the Lion-of-Love [Yeshua]; there shall be mourning and lamentation in the city [the human body], and the city [Yeshua] shall be like the Lion-of-Love to Me [the One-who-Is]. For I will encamp against you all around, I will surround you with watchmen, and I will raise siege works against you. You shall be brought down, and you shall speak from the ground, and your speech shall be heard from the dust [Yeshua]. Your voice [α-Yeshua] shall come from the earth [Yeshua] like that of a ghost, and you shall whisper your words from the dust.”

Isaiah also says why it was necessary for the Creator to be confined within the body of man, subject to the curse that Adam, through his disobedience, brought into the World. He, the prophet of α-Yeshua, says: “All we like sheep have gone astray, we have turned every one to his own way; but the One-who-Is [the Father] has laid on him [Yeshua] the iniquity of us all… He was taken by oppression and judgment, but who among those of his time believed that he had been cut off from the land of the living and stricken to death for the transgressions of my people [Israel]?”

Yeshua indeed had to incarnate within the body of Adam, inside the “city of David”. The eternal Lion of Love had to become a Lamb – the Lamb that took away (atoned for, cast into oblivion) the sin of the World. For this purpose, α-Yeshua became Yeshua, the Lion of Love became a sacrificial Lamb, one just like us, an innocent one dying in the place of the guilty ones; an Adam dying in the place of Adam!

When Adam was shaped from the dust of the Earth, at a genetic level he was made after the Image and likeness of the Creator, meaning of α-Yeshua. How was this accomplished, α-Yeshua being of a divine nature, meaning α-material, having nothing of the dust of the Earth in Him? I am not saying it is a mystery, but it is something beyond our capacity to understand, for we are beings who process information using material, physical concepts, just like our nature.

Unlike us, material beings, there are also α-material beings in the Universe, such as the angels and the Three Divine Beings. These α-material beings have the capacity to materialize. An α-material being can materialize into any form of matter, regardless of its state of aggregation, without ceasing to be a living being.

On the occasion of bringing Adam into being (existence), the Creator materialized in human form, and after this human Image of α-Yeshua, the One-who-Is shaped Adam. At a genetic level, Adam possessed exactly the same Y23 chromosome code as the chromosome code form of α-Yeshua (materialized); they were identical at a genetic level in the Y23 chromosomes. Adam, truly, was not only created after the image and likeness of the Creator, his Father, but, at a genetic level in the Y23 chromosomes, Adam was even the son of α-Yeshua materialized as a man.

When Eve was created, she was created from Adam, but at a genetic level, she was made into the female form of the Y23 chromosomes, namely X23. Eve, she too in her turn, was a daughter of α-Yeshua, but more precisely, she was a sort of daughter of Adam. For if at a genetic level Adam was identical in the Y23 chromosomes to the materialization of α-Yeshua, at a genetic level Eve was identical to Adam in the X23 chromosomes – a sort of mother, even though she was shaped from his rib, chronologically after Adam.

If Adam was a combination of genetic code between Eve (X23) and α-Yeshua materialized at the moment of this shaping of Adam from the dust of the Earth, Yeshua at his incarnation, after nearly four millennia, in taking on the likeness of man – a man exactly like us, born, not materialized – he, descended among us as one of us, was identical to Adam at a genetic level in the Y23 chromosomes, an authentic son of man (Adam). Meanwhile, in the X23 chromosomes, he, Yeshua, was identical not to Eve, but to one of her daughters, to Mary, his mother, and indirectly to David, from whom Mary was descended. Yeshua was in equal measure both the son of man (Adam) and the son of Mary, meaning the son of David.

Yeshua and Adam were identical in the Y23 chromosomes, precisely so that in equal measure, one would be the son of Love, and the other would be the son of man. Only in this way could Yeshua be both the seed of the woman (X23), a son of David, and the Savior, the son of Adam (Y23) – the son (Y23) of Love.

Was Yeshua God? No! Was α-Yeshua the son of God? No! Was Yeshua the son of God? Yes, through adoption. Was α-Yeshua God? Yes, before any beginning. First, before the beginning of the Universe, and later, before the beginning of the Earth, giving it life and man to rule over it.

The same Image that appeared to Adam was also revealed to Abel, Enoch, Noah, Job, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and all the prophets; and almost the same Image – with Mary's X23 signature – appeared to Mary and Joseph (her husband), first as a baby, then to the priests, the disciples, and the Roman soldiers who mocked him and ultimately killed him on the wood of the cross to which they nailed him, precisely to rise again into the immortality of the Image seen in the very first moment at the beginning by the eyes of the cherubim, who, as Father, worshiped Him on the day they were created.

Between α-Yeshua and Yeshua, there was a continuous connection that the incarnation and, later, death failed to destroy. Yeshua (α-Yeshua), in his soul, at an α-genetic level, was the Same, regardless of the form he possessed at any given moment; from eternity α-material, at the shaping of Adam materialized, then from Mary's womb incarnated.

Somehow, the godhead (the unique nature of the Three) has the capacity, at an α-genetic level, to reduce itself to the level of α-Y23 and to remain alive, intact, unchanged; somehow, being immortality, it has the capacity to pass through death and to restore itself to life; this is what it means to be Love, a divine Being – something that angels and humans do not possess; for in the Universe, only Love is incapable of dying from an α-material (and material) standpoint.

Yeshua – more precisely, α-Yeshua whispering through him (“the dust”) – said: “The Father loves me because I lay down my life that I may take it up again. No one takes it from me by force, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have the power to lay it down and I have the power to take it up again,” “I lay down my life for My sheep,” “I have come that the sheep may have life, and have it abundantly,” “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel,” “I have other sheep too [the ten tribes] that are not of this fold; I must bring them also. They will listen to My voice [α-Yeshua], and there will be one flock and one shepherd [king].”

Thus, we have arrived once again at The Parable of the Judgment, at the sheep and the goats, at the flock of sheep gathered all together into a fold, and at the mentioned shepherd-king.

Although we have not managed to find answers to all the questions, what is important is that we found the answer to the most important question – the one regarding the relationship between α-Yeshua and Israel. From now on, it will be easy for us to find the answers to the other questions.

Recapping, α-Yeshua was the Creator of Adam – the son of α-Yeshua; Yeshua was a son of Adam, on the one hand; on the other hand, he was a Jew born of Mary, a son of Abraham and David; Yeshua came for the lost sheep of the house of Israel, so that through his death they might have life abundantly.

Why, first and foremost, “the lost sheep of the house of Israel”? In this case, it is not about “my brothers,” because being the son of Adam, he was a brother to all people, the sons and daughters of Adam. Why, first and foremost, the house of Israel, with all of humanity placed on a secondary plane, as a graft into the main plan? The answer is found in the choosing and calling of Abraham, and later of Israel (both as an individual and as a nation).

When α-Yeshua initiated the covenant with the Jews through their fathers, α-Yeshua engaged in a two-way relationship, one in which even if Israel were to be unfaithful to the covenant, He, α-Yeshua, by calling Israel a son, assumed a responsibility to which He cannot fail to be faithful, loyal, unchanged, steadfast, even stubborn to save them. He chose them although He knew the path they would walk; He chose them precisely because He saw them as angels in the last generation – something that has not been seen since the foundation of the World!

The Jews were not chosen for their downfalls at the beginning, nor were they chosen for their oscillations within the covenant and faithfulness in relationship with the One-who-Is; they were chosen for the radiance in which they were envisioned at the end of history, just as it is said about them: “But at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who shall be found written in the book… Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky, and those who turn many to righteousness shall shine like the stars [the angels] eternally.”

This is how α-Yeshua envisioned them on the day He chose Abraham; this is how the prophet saw them: “How beautiful are your tents, O Jacob, your dwellings, O Israel! They stretch out like valleys, like gardens beside a river, like aloe trees planted by the One-who-Is, like cedars beside the waters. Water shall flow from his buckets, and his seed shall be watered by great waters. His king shall be exalted… and his kingdom shall become powerful.”

Were the prophecies and promises regarding Israel affected by the fact that the Jews of Yeshua's time did not recognize α-Yeshua come in the flesh? Were they to blame that, as a consequence of their blindness, Yeshua ultimately came to be crucified?

Those who find fault with the Jews for the death of Yeshua do not understand that for Love, it was infinitely more important for the Earth to be recovered from the fatal orbit in which it was placed by the Devil (the Serpent) the moment Adam and Eve lost the Earth, deceived, hypnotized, and intoxicated by the magic of the Devil's words. The Devil brought death to Earth and set the Earth on a course that was heading toward annihilation in relation to the Law of Love, the foundation that lies at the base of the Universe.

The death of Yeshua was the certain way to save the Earth; the death of Yeshua was the only way for man to be saved from a certain death – the consequence of Adam's disobedience, and later, of each and every human being. From the standpoint of the Law, we were all condemned to death!

The fact that Adam did not die on the day he sinned, the fact that none of us died the moment we sinned by violating the Law which says: “You shall love the One-who-Is, your Love, with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength; you shall love your neighbor as yourself,” is an expression of the mercy of the One-who-Is and of His expectation regarding us until the moment of our natural death.

From the moment we are born, because human nature has been hijacked, our actions are first stained by selfishness; and most of us do not even identify the One-who-Is within our priorities and our lives. If the Law were to be applied, most of us would probably not make it past childhood; the punishment would destroy us… but the Father waits for the son to recognize Him and to return from the natural state of hatred and selfishness to a new state, a miracle, to loving Love, loving the One-who-Is… for this is what salvation essentially consists of. It is a miracle, a rebirth, a birth from the One-who-Is; a different kind of seed placed within us, an α-material one; a new water welling up in the desert.

Yeshua, on one occasion, while in Samaria at Jacob's well, said: “If you had known the gift of Love and who it is that says to you, ‘Give Me a drink!’... you would have asked him, and He [α-Yeshua] would have given you living water… Everyone who drinks of this water [the natural] will be thirsty again. But whoever drinks of the water [α-natural] that I will give him will never be thirsty again; indeed, the water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”

Redemption – loving the One-who-Is and one's neighbor, just as Adam and Eve loved before their love was poisoned by the Serpent – is, above all, a miracle that Love performs within the heart… and in order for this miracle to be achieved, Yeshua had to die; he had to not be recognized by Israel back then!

If Israel had recognized in Yeshua α-Yeshua – the Love of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob –, they would have placed themselves as a human shield between the Roman soldiers (the cross) and Yeshua! If it had not been in the Plan of Love for Yeshua to die, the entire Universe would have placed itself between Yeshua – the Son of Love – and the cross; however, there would no longer have been any hope of salvation for the Earth and for man.

The Jews were not to blame at all! They were waiting for a promised Messiah to bring them peace and Paradise forever, for that was how the Messiah was drawn in the prophecies – prophecies that Yeshua did not fulfill. Why not? Because he had come to solve a much greater problem: the sin of the World.

The reason Adam did not die in Eden, the reason Cain did not die when he killed Abel, the reason no human being died the moment they committed a sin was that ever since Eden, Love pointed toward atonement, toward the possibility of forgiveness through the death of a substitute.

In Eden, Adam and Eve came to know sacrifice; and in the garments of sacrifice, they were clothed by Love. They were garments made from the skin of a sacrificed lamb, just as Abel had later been taught, just as α-Yeshua looked with pleasure upon the sacrifice brought by him; for in that lamb, He saw Himself.

On one occasion, Yeshua was asked by the teachers of the Law: “Are you greater than our father Abraham?” Yeshua answered them: “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day; he saw it and was glad.”

When did Abraham joyfully see Yeshua's day, and what day is it about? He saw it in the challenge of sacrificing his only son, Isaac. It was then that he saw the redemption prepared by the One-who-Is for His chosen ones.

Why did Abraham rejoice? Because, beyond the death of the Son of the One-who-Is, he also saw the resurrection; he saw the “birth” from death; he saw the Image of the Redeemer – the same Image seen by the cherubim on the day they were made, the Image of Love.

Yes, all the sacrifices of old pointed toward the sacrifice of Yeshua; all the sacrifices pointed toward the Lamb-of-Love sacrificed on the day of Passover. By virtue of the sacrifice of Yeshua, the sacrifices of old possessed value; by virtue of the sacrifice of Yeshua, Israel was delivered with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm from the Egypt of bondage.

Forgiveness (deliverance) did not come through the blood of lambs, of goats, of calves, or of doves, just as forgiveness could not come even through the blood of all humanity; forgiveness came through the blood of the Son-of-Love!

All the sacrifices of old were a reflection of the Sacrifice; all the sacrificed animals were a shadow of Yeshua, hanging between Heaven and earth upon the cross; a Yeshua nailed, mocked, and tortured by the servants of Rome, condemned by the Gentiles through Pilate, and killed by all those guilty before the Law, all those descended from Adam.

If the guilt of killing Yeshua does not rest upon Golgotha any more than it does upon the whole of humanity, why then did Yeshua say regarding the Temple, “behold, your House is left to you desolate”? Was this statement not an expression of condemnation because the Jews did not receive Yeshua?

The answer is no! “The desolate House” and “there shall not be left here one stone upon another” were not a consequence of the blindness of the Jews. Why not? For the same reason he called the Temple My Father's House. It is worth noting: My Father, not “yours”. Why? Because the ancient Temple – until the incarnation of Yeshua – was the Place where α-Yeshua manifested Himself from the midst of the cherubim upon the Mercy Seat of the Ark of the Covenant.

It was the Place where, day by day, with a presence that was generally unseen, He was in the midst of His people, their Father. In other words, he identified himself as being their Father (of old), while referring to Love as being his Father-Love; and by this, showing that from the moment he came to Earth as one in all things like us, things changed – the Temple had become the House of his Father, who was going to sacrifice His only Son, Yeshua, as the Sacrificial Lamb of the One-who-Is.

Thus, the Temple was no longer the Place for the exercise of Love's authority by α-Yeshua; it had become the Place for the exercise of his Father's authority, his Father's House – a House that was to be left desolate (empty), because after the death and resurrection of Yeshua, Another was to manifest on Earth as the One-who-Is (Love), One who for His period of governance did not consider that He would need a physical Temple, namely, the Comforter, who debuted His manifestation on the occasion of Shavuot (Pentecost), when Yeshua's close followers received the presence of the Holy and True Spirit for the purpose of spreading the news that the Kingdom is at hand, that the price of redemption was paid through Yeshua.

In this way, later on, not only did what had previously been the House of α-Yeshua – and then the Father's House – remain desolate, without any manifestation of Love, but it was also doomed to destruction. Why? Because during the governance of the Comforter, the Temple had no utility whatsoever, yet this lack of utility was not to be permanent, because α-Yeshua was to return to governance, and consequently, to His people with the coming of the Messiah (the Branch awaited for centuries, the son promised to David by oath by α-Yeshua, the man who was to inaugurate the Sabbath millennium in the midst of Jerusalem on Earth).

About him, the one to whom through adoption α-Yeshua will be Father, about the wise and faithful servant, the following is said through the prophet Isaiah: “I have put My words in your mouth and covered you with the shadow of My hand, that I may plant new heavens and lay the foundations of a new earth, and say to Zion: You are My people,” “For as the new heavens and the new earth that I will make shall endure before Me – says the One-who-Is – so shall your seed and your name [sons of Israel] endure.”

In ancient times, α-Yeshua swore to David, pointing toward a man – other than Himself incarnate (Yeshua) – this being a relationship of two, “and the counsel of peace shall be between them both” (the prophet Zechariah), saying through the prophet Nathan:

“When your days are fulfilled and you rest with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come from your own body, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a House for My Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to Me a son. If he commits iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men and with the blows of the sons of men; but My mercy shall not depart from him... I will settle him in My House forever, and in My Kingdom his throne shall be established forever.”

It was hard for David to accept that this prophecy did not have Solomon in mind; however, it is even harder for “Christians” to accept that this prophecy does not have Yeshua in mind as a son, but rather has α-Yeshua in mind as Father – the One who, as the One-who-Is, in the final hours of history, from the Throne of Love, will adopt a man called the Branch, the servant of the One-who-Is, or the son of David.

“Christians,” after Nicaea, struggled to the point of sweating to turn the servant of the One-who-Is into “the Servant of the Lord”; they took the Hebrew text – a text without capital letters in the warm version of the prophets – and translated it into Latin, putting “the Servant of the Lord” everywhere according to their whim and temporary interests, a matter that will be deepened and proven in other paragraphs that follow.

Returning to Yeshua's prophecy regarding “the desolate House” and “there shall not be left here one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down,” this prophecy, and its fulfillment, clearly show that Nathan's prophecy did not have in mind any of David's sons up to the time when Yeshua had been a son of Israel.

The destruction of the Temple and the fall of Jerusalem were part of Nathan's prophecy. Another son of David had to come – the Branch – who would raise a throne of David from the ruins of history, and raise a Temple in which the Lamb (the High Priest) would be the One-who-Is forever, so that Zechariah's prophecy would be an eternal reality: “and the counsel of peace shall be between them both,” the union between the Father (α-Yeshua) and the son (the Prince, the Branch, the Messiah). The Temple had to be destroyed in view of the millennial and eternal Temple; otherwise, the prophecy regarding the one who will build and reign eternally could not be fulfilled.

If eternally Love (Echad) upon the Throne will be a succession of three colors, a succession of the one-who-was, the One-who-Is, the one-who-come, upon the throne of Israel (the mountain of the Earth and, later, of the Universe) there will be a single eternal king: the man-Messiah, a prophet (like Moses) who never dies (like Elijah), a king after Love's own heart (like David), a righteous priest (like Zadok); a Son of Love (like Adam).

The Scriptures nowhere say that Elijah will come again, they do not say that David will come again, they do not say that Zadok will come again; they say through Moses the way in which these will find themselves in the man-Messiah, namely, one like me, one like them… one like all of them combined, because this prophet, priest, and king is destined to lead the chosen ones of Love – both the living found in the book and the dead brought back to life by Love – out of the Egypt of this world at the end of history, through the wilderness of the millennium, into the eternity of the world to come.

This man-Messiah is a Moses – one like him –, he is a Joseph placed upon the highest throne, he is a Mordecai dressed in the king's royal robes and placed upon the king's white horse, he is the man raised to the rank of Son of Love (the new Adam), being adopted by α-Yeshua in his capacity as Love (the One-Who-Is) upon the Throne.

Returning to Yeshua mission, when he concluded his work as a sacrificial lamb, he cried out, “it is finished.” Within his cry, beyond the indescribable pain stemming from the guilt of the entire World taken upon him, one can see the joy of a task fulfilled to the very end. He had come to die in Adam's place, he had come to die in the place of us all; he had come as a sacrificial lamb, dying in the middle of a controversial week, yet death could not hold him, and after “three nights and three days he rose again” – a resurrection in which joy was seen stripped of any form of sadness.

Yeshua did not rise from the grave coming out with empty hands. The resurrection raised him from death with another task or mission – that of Mediator before the Throne of the Universe for the Earth. The sacrifice was only one step of the redemption, the sacrifice was a payment, the sacrifice was a slaughtered lamb, yet the sacrifice demanded more: its blood had to reach before the Throne, represented by the Mercy Seat situated in the Holy of Holies, or in Yeshua's case, right in the heart of the Universe, at the Throne of Love, the eternal one.

Thus the Lamb became the High Priest; thus Yeshua ascended to the Throne, with his very own blood of a son of man and His α-blood of a Son of Love, being in this way the only mediator (Mediator) with full rights to represent humanity in his capacity as the One-who-Come.

Today, at the moment of writing these words, we are living in the final moments of the Earth's governance by the Comforter who came as the One-who-Is on the occasion of the disciples' Shavuot, for this is what Yeshua referred to when he said: “it is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Comforter will not come to you; but if I go, I will send Him to you.”

In order for Yeshua to be able to bring his blood to the Throne of Love in Heaven, the Throne of the One-who-Is on Earth had to be vacated by the Father – the place where the Comforter seated Himself.

Thus, the Comforter became the One-who-Is, the Father became the One-who-Was, and α-Yeshua (Yeshua) became the One-who-Come... the One seen by the prophets coming from the Heavenly Zion into the Zion on Earth at the beginning of the millennium.

There have been two major moments in history so far when the unique Person in authority upon the Throne of Love yielded the Place on the Throne to let Another be that unique Person in authority upon the Throne of Love on Earth.

If up until the incarnation α-Yeshua was upon the Throne in His capacity as the One-who-Is, while the Comforter was the One-who-Was, and the Father was the One-who-Come (following the pattern of Moses between Aaron and Hur); if between the incarnation and Shavuot the Father was upon the Throne in His capacity as the One-who-Is, α-Yeshua in his capacity as the One-who-Was, and the Comforter in his capacity as the One-who-Come; if after Shavuot the Comforter was upon the Throne in His capacity as the One-who-Is, the Father in his capacity as the One-who-Was, and α-Yeshua in his capacity as the One-who-Come; within a few days from this moment of writing, another move will take place upon the Throne: α-Yeshua will ascend the Throne in His capacity as the One-who-Is.

This new reality, in which α-Yeshua (the One-who-Is) – who made the covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob – will once again ascend the Throne in His capacity as Love or the One-who-Is, is described metaphorically by Daniel through the words: “At that time Micha-El (Who is like the One-who-Is?), the Great-Prince who has charge of your people, shall arise.”

The same thing is described in Revelation, where, in the first phase, the Lamb (the One-who-Come) is depicted walking toward the Throne, upon which sits the One-who-Is (the Comforter). From the Throne, the question is made heard: “Who is worthy? (to be the One-who-Is)?”. The answer: “The Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has conquered.”

Then the cameras focus on the Lamb at the moment of authority transition; at that point, “the four living creatures [those of the One-who-Was and the One-who-Come] and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb” in His capacity as the new the One-who-Is, and they sang a new song. “Worthy is the Lamb... for You were slain, and by Your blood You ransomed for Love people from every tribe and language and people and nation... To Him who sits on the Throne, (meaning)) to the Lamb, be praise and honor and glory and might forever and ever!”

The same moment (from history view) is described by Daniel through the words: “You watched as a stone was cut out without hands, which struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces.” “The stone that struck the image became a great Mountain and filled the whole earth.” “In the days of these kings, the Love of the Heavens will set up a Kingdom that shall never be destroyed, nor shall the kingdom be left to another people.” “But the saints of the Most High shall receive the Kingdom and possess the Kingdom forever, from eternity to eternity.”

The moment described by the words above marks the change upon the Throne and its effects on Earth. The events are much more complex than those mentioned above. However, one of the most important moments is found described through the words: “And a stone was cut out without hands, which struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces... the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth.”

This description from Daniel overlaps with the prophecy of Micah and Isaiah – prophecies from which I will quote in fragments, and then we will turn our attention to the “two feet” seen by Daniel: feet of iron (Roman) and clay (from the desert), feet that end in ten toes of mixed iron and clay, because the stone strikes the feet, leaving for an hour of history the ten toes to be judged at the end.

Micah says: “In the latter days, the Mountain of the House of the One-who-Is shall be established firm as the highest Mountain, and shall be exalted above the hills; and peoples shall flow to it. Many nations shall come and say: ‘Come, let us go up to the Mountain of the One-who-Is, to the House of the Love of Jacob, that He may teach us His ways and that we may walk in His paths!’... For out of Zion shall go forth the Law, and the Word of the One-who-Is from Jerusalem.”

Isaiah adds: “In that day, the branch [the son] of the One-who-Is shall be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the land shall be the pride and glory for the survivors of Israel. And he who is left in Zion and remains in Jerusalem will be called holy, everyone who has been recorded for life in Jerusalem.” “There shall come forth a shoot from the stump of Jesse, and a branch shall grow out of his roots. And the Spirit of the One-who-Is shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the One-who-Is... for the Earth shall be full of the knowledge of the One-who-Is as the waters cover the sea.”

The prophetic truth is clear when you look upon the prophecies to understand them. The truth regarding the Love upon the Throne expressed through Echad (the absolute One) is simple when you have an open heart to understand. Echad is like the circulatory system that gives us and maintains our life. Although we have a single heart, without veins and arteries it has no utility whatsoever. Echad is like the day at noon; to exist, it requires a sunrise (the One-who-Come) and a sunset (the One-who-Was).

This image of One between Two – in which only One receives worship, being the supreme and indivisible Authority – was illustrated by the Mercy Seat within the Holy of Holies, the place from which the Shekinah manifested from the midst of the two Cherubim, for both the cover and the Cherubim (the Two stripped of authority) were made of gold, a symbol of the Godhead.

The construction of the Cover (the Throne) was done according to the precise instructions that Moses received from Love; this Mercy Seat was made after the “pattern that was shown” to Moses, being an exemplification of the things in Heaven. The empty space between the two Cherubim, their faces looking toward each other toward the empty Place, the touching of their wings above, signified exactly this rotational movement, the succession upon the Throne, when, one by one, each of the Three was to strip Himself of absolute authority, becoming the One-who-Was, so that in the next cycle he would become the One-who-Come, and in a subsequent cycle become once again the One-who-Is.

Although the One-who-Is is the absolute authority, He cannot exercise His authority without the other Two – One a witness of the past, the Other a witness of the future. The authority of Love is an exercise in office by One alone, sustained, through a suitable helper, by the other Two. Upon this principle the Universe was constructed, and this was the reality until the appearance of sin.

Thus it is that at the moment when α-Yeshua visited Abraham in his capacity as the One-who-Is on Earth, He was accompanied by two other angels. These cherubim were the living creatures (the ministers) who permanently accompanied α-Yeshua in His work as the One-who-Is.

Among these cherubim (ministers), the name of only one of them was revealed to humans: Gabriel. Gabriel was and is the minister (the spokesperson) of α-Yeshua. He appears in the Scriptures up to the moment of the incarnation. He appears in relation to Daniel, explaining the vision to him; he appears in relation to Zechariah the priest, speaking to him about John, the son Elizabeth would bear him (who shortly after became pregnant); he appears in relation to Mary, the mother of the child Yeshua, before she became pregnant.

After the moment of the incarnation, when the Father ascended the Throne, after the birth of Yeshua, Herod learns from the magi that a child, called king, was born in Bethlehem. Herod desires the death of this recently born child, and, being ignored by the magi upon their departure home, he orders the killing of all male children under two years old born in Bethlehem. It was then that Joseph, Mary's husband, was notified in a dream by an angel about Herod's murderous plans. Worth noting is the fact that the name of the Father's cherub, who warned Joseph, is not specified... Gabriel, at that moment, was no longer in office as spokesperson, because neither was α-Yeshua in office anymore in his capacity as the One-who-Is.

We observe the exact same thing at the moment when John receives his Revelation. At the moment when John receives his Revelation, the Comforter was upon the Throne in relation to the Earth, having become the One-who-Is at Shavuot – the moment when Yeshua began his role as Mediator before the Throne in Heaven.

As I have said, the Comforter had His own ministers (whose names we do not know) in His capacity as the One-who-Is, a fact that emerges from the way the Revelation was given to John: a) The revelation of Yeshua (the Mediator) which Love (the Comforter) gave him; b) sending it, through His angel (the Comforter's cherub), to His servant (the Comforter's servant) John. We notice that the name of the spokesperson is not specified... it was not Gabriel, because Gabriel was no longer in office as spokesperson, just as neither was α-Yeshua in office anymore as the One-who-Is.

This reality highlights once again that the three administrations of the Three, although they sometimes intersect tangentially, never overlap on the plane of the Earth, nor on the plane of the Universe level. Love is a manifestation of One, not of Two, not of Three... an essential truth that Nicaea failed to understand!

Before passing on to the heresy and universal catastrophe called Nicaea, I want to clarify in haste the monotheism (Echad) of Yeshua, of Paul, James, Peter, and John.

When Yeshua asserts, “And this is eternal life, that they know You [Father], the only true Love, and Yeshua whom You have sent [as a Sacrificial Lamb],” he clearly reaffirms the absolute Hebrew monotheism expressed through Shema Yisrael. Considering that the statement refers to salvation (eternal life), Yeshua's role as a Sacrificial Lamb is injected into Shema Yisrael. Why? Because, in view of salvation, worship toward the One-who-Is alone is not sufficient. This was sufficient in Eden, until Adam's fall into sin. After the fall, the sacrifice of the lamb intervenes in the process of rehabilitation.

The Lamb is not the subject of worship, yet it is the channel through which the sinner receives total forgiveness and eternal life. Under the conditions of sin, a correct monotheistic worship does not save without atonement. Israel was taught this day by day at the Tabernacle and in the Temple, later on. Recognizing Yeshua in his capacity as the the Lamb who took away the sins of the World becomes essential in the process of salvation. Furthermore, the one who uttered Shema Yisrael was none other than the α-Lamb, before the incarnation and the sacrifice. Between α-Yeshua (Yeshua) and Israel there is a Father-son relationship – it is as if Yeshua had said, “that they know You, Echad, and Abraham whom You have chosen.”

In Paul's theology, monotheism is nuanced by the role of Yeshua in relation to the Father (the Love upon the Throne); in this relationship, worship is given to One, the Father, while the value of the sacrifice or Yeshua's role as mediator is recognized. The Spirit (never the Comforter!) is seen as an extension of the Father (of Love), a manifestation of power or influence. “For One is the One-Who-Is, and one is the mediator between Love and men: the man Yeshua,” “For us, there is only one the One-who-Is, the Father... and one lord [through adoption], Yeshua,” “The grace of Yeshua [the Sacrifice] and the love of the One-who-Is [the Father sacrificing the Son] and the communion of the Holy Spirit [the unseen presence of the One-who-Is] be with you all!”, “But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit [α-matter, the influence of the One-who-Is], if the Spirit of the One-who-Is dwells in you. Now if anyone does not have the Spirit of Yeshua [who possessed the Spirit of the One-who-Is], he does not belong to him [in his capacity as shepherd],” “Grace to you and peace from the One-who-Is, our Father, and from the lord [the adopted one] Yeshua [in his capacity of sacrifice and mediation].”

In the theology of Peter, Jude, and John, we encounter the same monotheism structured into roles, in which the Father (the manifestation of Love) receives worship as the One-who-Is, and Yeshua is seen in the role of the Lamb and the High Priest, while the Spirit is seen as the invisible force or influence of Love within man and within the space in which he exists. “Chosen according to the foreknowledge of the One-who-Is the Father [Love], through sanctification by the Spirit [the work of Love within man], for obedience and sprinkling with the blood of Yeshua [the essential role of the sacrifice]” (Peter); “Praying in the Holy Spirit [the inspiration of the One-who-Is], keep yourselves in the love of Love [the One-who-Is], waiting for the mercy [the atonement] of our lord [the adopted one] Yeshua, unto eternal life” (Jude); “Grace to you and peace from the One-who-Is [the Comforter] – Him-who-Was, and Him-who-Come – [the rotating succession of Authority], and from the seven spirits [the Spirit of the One-who-Is] that are before the seat of His Throne, and from Yeshua [the mediator], the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the lord of the kings of the earth!” (John).

All these statements do not highlight a unity of Three upon the Throne, as Nicaea wants to present it, but, on the contrary, all these statements have as the centrality of worship One alone, just as Love was enunciated in Shema Yisrael. Those who made the statements above were monotheistic Jews who had Shema Yisrael as their rule of life, their very instinct to breathe.

Today's “Christians” see in the statements of these Jews the assertions of “Christians” who had the text of Nicaea before them – a text that appeared 300 years later. Today's “Christians” see the doctrine of the trinity where it does not exist, because this doctrine has been tattooed upon their eyes; they have been anesthetized with its teaching. The doctrine of the trinity is declared to be an axiom that no longer needs demonstrations; however, an axiom claiming that “1 + 1 + 1 = 1” must not only be demystified, it must be exposed for what it is: an ordinary lie! An idolatry and a deadly sin!

Before the conclusion, a truth must be highlighted: to the disciples, at the time of Yeshua's death and resurrection, and later to Paul, the principle of succession upon the Throne of Love was not revealed. It was impossible for them to understand this truth at that time. Yeshua told them clearly: “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. When the Comforter [as the One-who-Is], the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak, and He will disclose to you the things that are to come. He will glorify Me, for He will take what is Mine [the One-who-Was] and disclose it to you. All that the Father [the One-who-Is] has is Mine [the One-who-Was]; therefore I said that He will take what is Mine [the One-who-Was] and disclose it to you [the One-who-Come].”

In conclusion, if the Jews, according to their understanding, continued to worship α-Yeshua even when the Father was on the Throne, and then the Comforter; if the disciples continued to worship the Father even when the Comforter was on the Throne; both categories, having a monotheistic worship, essentially worshiped Love, for Love manifested through α-Yeshua while He was the One-who-Is, and Love manifested through the Father while He was the One-who-Is.

At the diametrically opposed pole, “Christianity” has worshiped a poly-divinity called trinity, something where Three share the Throne in equal measure, being considered One through their common α-substance, by being divine Beings. The problem is severe! Although on the surface it appears to be something correct, in the reality of the Throne it is idolatry! I am not saying it, Echad is saying it, who says that That One is indivisible, a single supreme authority; One, not Three. A total, exclusive, and complete One... Anything else is idolatry!

Love – the One-who-Is – does not share His glory with anyone, not even with the One-who-Was or with the One-who-Come! The first commandment forbids worship before the One-who-Was, or before the One-who-Come in the exact same measure that it does not permit worship to the One-who-Is without being flanked by the One-who-Was and by the One-who-Come – these being stripped of any authority, having the role of witnesses to the governance.

This is how the Law of Love translates at the level of the first commandment... A Law severely (mortally) violated through the phrasing “in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit” – an uncanonical statement, a formula of the trinity acting as an anesthesia to the conscience, a formula injected like a drug into the heart of “Christianity” at Nicaea.

Nicaea (the year 325) was the greatest hijacking operation of Christianity into directions unsuspected at that time; it was an operation of the Empire through Constantine (a pagan emperor) primarily for geo-political interests. It was the oxygen mask of a dying empire. It seems like a bold statement that demands an urgent demonstration, lest the “Christian” be left in an identity suspense.

Nicaea was more than the formulation of the trinity dogma, having at its core a textual variant of Matthew that was intended to become popular at that time, and which was later injected into the masses of believers like a “necessary” intravenous drip of which they had no actual need. It is one thing to give morphine to a terminally ill patient who can no longer bear his pain, and it is something entirely different to inject morphine into the vein of a healthy man – you risk making him dependent on it or on you... essentially, this is what was intended; here we are, injected for thousands of years.

At the time of Nicaea, another version of Matthew circulated more widely within Christendom – one that did not contain the Nicene variant (“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit”); rather, as emerges from the writings of Eusebius of Caesarea, there existed an older variant of Matthew's text, from which he quotes dozens of times before Nicaea in the following manner: “Go and make disciples of all nations in my name (en tō onomati mou), teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Demonstratio Evangelica, Book III).

This variant is confirmed by the Hebrew version of Shem Tov: “Lechu ve-shamru otam le-kayem kol ha-devarim asher tziviti etchem ad olam” / “Go and keep them to fulfill all the things which I have commanded you forever.”

We observe how the Nicene variant was propagated within “Christianity” precisely to support Nicaea, and that Nicaea eliminated any other variant that would not have supported the dogma of the trinity – a dogma that relies to the greatest extent upon the Nicene variant.

Historical testimonies support that Eusebius of Caesarea signed the Nicene Creed largely as a result of the political pressure exerted by Emperor Constantine, who desired the unity of the empire at all costs. Later, after Nicaea, he uses only the Nicene variant in his writings – “in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” – which he had not used in his writings prior to Nicaea.

Worth noting is the fact that although Constantine was not a theologian, he insisted on a formulation of the creed dictated by him, as he at that time had no interest in proclaiming the truth, his motives being strictly political. He clearly decreed that anyone who refused to sign the modified creed (including “homoousios” – of the same substance as the Father) and the canons established by the majority would be immediately exiled politically and deposed from office (the episcopal seat).

Nicaea was the turning point of “Christianity” in relation to the truth revealed by α-Yeshua through His prophets; it was a definitive rupture, one that with the centuries that followed deepened and widened more and more; initially due to the political strategy motives of Constantine and the bishops around him.

If, up until Nicaea, the “Resurrection of the Lord” – which had become a feast within “Christianity” – was determined based on the Pesach (Passover) of the Jewish biblical calendar in relation to the 14th of Nisan, after Nicaea things changed to such an extent that it was categorically forbidden for the “Christian” feast to ever again coincide with that of the Jews, as the Julian solar calendar was adopted instead of the biblical lunar calendar – Constantine justifying his decision as follows: “It appeared as an altogether unworthy thing that in the celebration of this most holy feast we should follow the custom of the Jews... Let us, therefore, have nothing in common with this detestable Jewish crowd.” (Eusebiu din Cezareea în Vita Constantini)

Also as a consequence of Nicaea, the community of Nicaea and the satellite synods of that period (such as the one in Laodicea) legislated a total separation from the practices commanded in the Torah. The observance of the biblical Sabbath (Saturday) as a day of rest was discouraged and subsequently forbidden, officially imposing Sunday (the day of the sun in the Roman Empire). “Christians” were forbidden from further participating in the feasts given by the One-who-Is to the people of Israel in Leviticus 23 (such as Shavuot/Pentecost, Sukkot/Tabernacles, or the unleavened bread of Pesach). Their practice was cataloged as a “renunciation of Christ.”

From a theological standpoint, the political decisions of Nicaea provided the imperial legal framework for the idea that the Church completely replaced Israel in God's plan, and that the Jews were cursed and permanently abandoned due to their “rejection of Christ.” The Scriptures given to the Jews were reinterpreted exclusively through a “Christian” allegorical prism, stripping the Jewish people of their biblical identity in the eyes of Roman law, and Jewish converts to “Christianity” were forced after Nicaea to change their Hebrew names to “Christian” (Roman) names and to completely renounce any ancestral custom described in the Torah.

Although Nicaea did not physically destroy the Scriptures given to the Jews, it confiscated their literal sense for the benefit of the new state religious system, drawing an insurmountable legislative and theological barrier between „Christians” and the Jewish people. Without the decisions of Nicaea, the later medieval antisemitism would not have had a legal basis in the Roman Empire.

After Nicaea, Emperor Constantine sent an official letter to all the churches in the empire that were not directly represented at Nicaea. Thus Constantine wrote:

“When the question arose concerning the most holy day of Easter, it was decreed by common consent that it would be convenient for everyone, everywhere, to celebrate it on the same day... It appeared as an altogether unworthy thing that in the celebration of this most holy feast we should follow the custom of the Jews... It is well, therefore, to reject their custom, so that we may transmit to our posterity the correct manner of celebration... Let us, therefore, have nothing in common with that detestable Jewish crowd... Consequently, this irregularity must be corrected, so that we may no longer have anything in common with these murderers of our Lord. Extend your vigilance so that your pure souls may not appear to share the customs of a people so degraded.” (Eusebiu din Cezareea în Vita Constantini)

From a strictly geopolitical standpoint, Nicaea was a project of national salvation and political unification of the Roman Empire, orchestrated by Emperor Constantine. The Roman Empire had just emerged from a harsh period of devastating civil wars, military anarchy, and economic collapse. The empire was fragmented culturally, religiously, and administratively. By establishing a single mandatory Creed at Nicaea, Constantine transformed “Christianity” into a unified state ideology. The Church became the institution that “glued” the provinces of the empire back together, offering a common identity.

Nicaea created a geopolitical precedent that defined Europe for the next millennium: the emperor as the de facto leader of the Church. Although he was not baptized and was not even part of the clergy, Constantine convened the council, presided over the sessions, led the debates, and imposed the terms. From that moment on, dogmatic decisions became imperial laws, and heresy (the deviation from the creed) was equated with state treason. The emperor gained an unprecedented instrument of social control.

Although Emperor Constantine's intention was to centralize power around his own person and the new capital in the East (Constantinople), the long-term effects of the council created the perfect context for the bishop of Rome to become the supreme leader of the West. In the absence of an emperor or a capable governor, the Pope assumed the role of political leader and civil protector of Rome.

Prior to the year 325, the primacy of Rome was one based on “spiritual prestige” and “apostolic tradition”, but it lacked written recognition in universal church law. Through Canon 6, the council legislated the fact that Rome holds a superior administrative (metropolitan) authority over vast regions. This provided Rome with a legal basis, recognized by all other churches, upon which subsequent popes expanded to claim jurisdiction over the entire West.

Because Nicaea transformed theological disputes into state matters, the East fell into chronic political instability. Byzantine emperors frequently changed sides. Left without support in the East, bishops persecuted by the emperor began to appeal to Rome – the only powerful apostolic see located outside the direct reach of the imperial army. In the year 343, it was officially legislated that the bishop of Rome is the supreme court of appeal for any unjustly dismissed bishop. Nicaea therefore created the crisis, and Rome offered itself as the solution.

While the patriarchates in the East (Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch) often compromised themselves from a doctrinal standpoint, signing ambiguous creeds to please the emperors, Rome remained firm and inflexible in defending the dogma established at Nicaea. This consistency provided Rome with a huge moral authority. In the eyes of „Christians” throughout the entire empire, the popes became the sole “guarantors of the true faith”, untouched by the political games of the imperial court.

By fixing the imperial attention upon the East and defining the church structures at Nicaea, Constantinople became a “court church,” where the patriarch could be dismissed at any moment by the emperor. Rome, being left on a secondary plane from a political standpoint, escaped this suffocation. The political power vacuum left behind by Constantine allowed the papacy to gradually occupy not only spiritual leadership but also civil leadership in Italy, transforming itself from a simple bishopric into an independent geopolitical power.

In conclusion, Nicaea provided Rome with the legal framework (Canon 6), the moral authority (the defense of the creed), and the political context (the appeals of persecuted bishops) that transformed the Pope's primacy of honor into a primacy of effective jurisdiction. Without the precedent created at Nicaea, the medieval papacy would not have possessed the theological and legal instruments to rise above the kings of Europe.

Unlike Constantine, who referred to the Jews in his letters as a “detestable crowd” and “murderers of the Lord,” Rome approached the issue through the prism of theological doctrine. Papal Rome (and the consensus of the bishops at Nicaea) definitively formalized “Replacement Theology”.

According to this vision, due to the rejection of Christ, the Church proclaimed itself as being the “New Israel.” From a spiritual standpoint, the Jews were no longer viewed as the chosen people of the covenant, but as a people left in “blindness,” whose only path to salvation was conversion and the total abandonment of Jewish practices.

There was a perfect synergy between Constantine's political desire and the theology of Rome. Prior to Nicaea, there were “Christians” (especially in the East) who calculated the date of Easter by referring to the Jewish lunar calendar (celebrating on the 14th of Nisan, along with Pesach). For over a century, Rome had already been practicing a calculation independent of the Jewish calendar, desiring for Easter to always fall on a Sunday.

At Nicaea, the Pope's delegates firmly supported the ban on dependency on the Jewish calendar. Thus, while Constantine stated politically that it was “unworthy to follow the custom of the Jews,” Rome argued theologically: the Church, possessing apostolic authority, should not receive the calendar from those who did not recognize Christ. Nicaea sanctioned the abandonment of the Jewish method in favor of the Alexandrian astronomical calculation (the Julian calendar).

Both the State (Constantine) and the Church (Rome) needed uniformity. Constantine wanted a single law within the empire, and Rome wanted a single liturgy within the churches. The elimination of the “Jewish element” from “Christian practices” was the fastest way to achieve “a pure Christian identity”, separated from Judaism.

The strict theological position of the bishops at Nicaea was transformed into church laws (canons) by the Church itself in the following years. For instance, the Council of Laodicea (close in era) forbade Christians from receiving unleavened bread from the Jews or from keeping the Sabbath (Saturday), under the penalty of anathema.

If at Nicaea the separation was decided at the level of a geopolitical principle, the councils that followed translated this principle into day-to-day church laws, introducing severe punishments (deposition for the clergy and excommunication for the laity).

The Council of Laodicea (ca. 343–364). This local synod issued the most specific and harsh rules against the “judaizing” of “Christians”. Canon 29: It was the law that officially moved the rest from Saturday to Sunday. The text states: “Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honoring the Lord's Day... But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema (cursed/excluded) from Christ.” Canon 37: It forbade “Christians” from any festive interaction with the Jews. “It is not lawful to receive portions sent from the feasts of Jews, nor to feast together with them.” Canon 38: It expressly prohibited the consumption of unleavened bread (the unleavened bread used by Jews for Pesach). “It is not lawful to receive unleavened bread from the Jews, nor to be partakers of their impiety.”

The Council of Antioch (the year 341). Canon 1: This canon reinforced the liturgical decision of Nicaea. It provided that any layman who continues to celebrate Easter at the same time as the Jews (on the 14th of Nisan) shall be excommunicated. If a bishop, priest, or deacon dared to do this, he was deposed on the spot (losing his right to ever minister again).

The Apostolic Canons (Definitively codified in the 4th century). Although symbolically attributed to the first apostles, these laws received universal legal authority in the 4th-5th centuries and contain extremely clear provisions. Canon 70 Ap.: “If any bishop, or presbyter, or deacon, or anyone from the catalog of the clergy shall fast with the Jews, or keep feasts with them, or receive from them their feast gifts, such as unleavened bread or anything of this kind, let him be deposed; and if he be a layman, let him be excommunicated.” Canon 71 Ap.: It forbade “Christians” from making any material contribution to Jewish or pagan worships. “If any Christian brings oil to the assembly (synagogue) of the Jews or to the temples of the pagans on their feasts, or lights lamps, let him be excommunicated.” Canon 64 Ap.: It forbade fasting on Saturdays (with the exception of Holy Saturday), so as not to imitate Jewish mourning or ascetic regulations.

The Sixth Ecumenical Council (the Trullan Council, the year 691). Even several decades after the rise of Islam, the Church felt the need to reconfirm these laws because social mixing still existed. Canon 11 of the Trullan Council went beyond religion, entering the sphere of civil and private life: “Let no one counted in the priestly state, or layman, eat the unleavened bread of the Jews, nor associate with them, nor call them in sickness and receive remedies (medicines) from them, nor bathe with them in the public baths. And if anyone should dare to do this, if he be a cleric, let him be deposed, and if he be a layman, let him be excommunicated.”

All these canons demonstrate that separation from Judaism was not just a subtle dogmatic matter, but a strategy of total social isolation. The post-Nicene Church forbade “Christians” from eating with Jews, being treated by their doctors, bathing in the same public places, accepting their food gifts, or respecting their holy days.

In the Middle Ages, the church canons (Laodicea, Antioch, Trullan) ceased to be simple internal regulations and were integrated into the civil law codes of European empires and kingdoms. This fact produced devastating effects.

The canonical ban on communal meals, shared public baths, and treatments by Jewish doctors (Canon 11 of the Trullan Council) destroyed social bridges. The Jews were pushed to the margins of society, being subsequently enclosed in physically isolated quarters (the future ghettos). The official teaching derived from the spirit of Nicaea – that the Jews bear an eternal collective “guilt for the death of Christ” – provided the moral justification for popular violence. During the Crusades, “Christian” armies departing for Jerusalem massacred entire Jewish communities along the Rhine Valley, considering them “internal enemies of Christ.”

Because the canons (such as Canon 38 of the Council of Laodicea) completely forbade Jewish unleavened bread, labeling it as “impiety,” absurd myths appeared among the illiterate “Christian” population. The most toxic was that of the ritual killing of “Christian children” to use their blood to prepare the Passover unleavened bread, triggering hundreds of pogroms over the centuries. The Fourth Lateran Council (1215), continuing the logic of radical separation, imposed on the Jews the obligation to wear a distinctive mark on their clothes (a piece of yellow cloth or a circle). This medieval mechanism was copied identically by the Nazi regime in the 20th century by imposing the yellow star.

Although modern society has secularized, the prejudices grounded in early canons have transformed from religious motives into racial, economic, or conspiratorial motives. The canons that forbade “Christians” from being subordinate to Jews or from holding common property with them forced medieval Jewish communities to operate only in financial fields (money lending being forbidden to “Christians”).

Presently, this directly fuels the modern antisemitic stereotype that “the Jews control global banks, the press, and governments”. The medieval myth of child sacrifice has survived. Furthermore, in current geopolitical conflicts, rhetoric of the “ritual infanticide” type is often projected onto the state of Israel.

Returning to Nicaea and the formulations of faith that derived from Nicaea – formulations which, as seen above, were motivated more by political interests (the unity of the empire) and the separation from Judaism – we will have to analyze to what extent these confessions of faith have authentic support in “law and testimony,” in what was revealed in the Scriptures to be canonical (pure theology), and what does not (institutional heresy).

The trinity was the main doctrine (the headline) of Nicaea. The trinity asserts, in essence, “one God in three distinct, equal, and co-eternal Persons (the Father, the Son, and, through the derivation of the year 381, the Holy Spirit).” These Three exercise their authority at the same time, through interdependence.

Consequently, Christ, between the incarnation and the resurrection, was a blend of two natures (100% human and 100% divine) “without being mingled or separated” (a functioning God on Earth, while being like us, human), a Man with “two wills (divine and human), the human one being perfectly aligned and subjected to the divine one,” a Man born of a “Mother of God”, since the One born of her was “God incarnate”.

To what extent is this doctrine based on the Scriptures? We have seen that Echad (One) does not permit a coexistence upon the Throne; although there are Three, at the moment of exercising authority, only One is the One-who-Is. One!

On the other hand, we have seen that at the moment when Yeshua was on Earth, having come as a sacrificial Lamb, he was 100% a son of Adam (Y23), a son of Mary (X23). He asserted that everything he did was a manifestation of the Father's Spirit (the One-who-Is) manifesting through him. Between him, in his mission, and John the Baptist, in his mission, there was no difference regarding the dependency on the Father.

If Yeshua had been the One-who-Is from the moment of the incarnation until the ascension, His glory would have destroyed all the sinners (all of them!) around Him. Mary would not have come to be the “Mother of God” because from the very moment of conception, she would have been destroyed by the glory of the “God cell” within her womb, she being a daughter of Adam, born under the curse of duality (good and evil) in which Adam's fall placed humanity.

If Yeshua had been the One-who-Is on the Cross, He could not have died; the One-who-Is is inherently greater than death. If the Three were One throughout the entirety of history, Yeshua could not have said that “no one has seen the Father”; if the Three are permanently the One-who-Is, then it would not have been necessary to say, “it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Comforter cannot come.”

If the Three share everything in common, the expression “He will take what is mine” would have made no sense; Yeshua would have said that “He will take what is Ours.” It is true that Moses uses this expression, but the context is different, and the revelation coming through Yeshua is greater (4th class) than the revelation coming through Moses (2nd class), from a historical standpoint.

The expression regarding the dual nature of Yeshua – “without being mingled or separated” – is an abstract expression and expresses a mist in which the vapors are both water and fire at the same time.

It is true that Yeshua, through the incarnation, lost nothing of his pre-human nature, yet this does not mean that he was the One-who-Is on Earth. He came stripped of any glory, or of any divine attributes; he was human just as Adam was human, just as Mary was human. How was this thing possible? The possibility lies in the fact that the One-who-Was (or the One-who-Come) is stripped of any divine attributes. Echad makes an incarnation 100% as a man possible.

The trinity, in all its aspects, is a heresy! Emperor Constantine needed a formulation of the divinity within the empire different from absolute Hebrew monotheism. Constantine, who was not a Christian, pushed the idea of unity in substance, emphasizing that this would mean One – which is false. One has nothing to do with substance (the unique divine nature of the Three); One cannot be Three. Mathematically, Echad translates to “0 + 1 + 0 = 1”, whereas the trinity translates to “1 + 1 + 1 = 1” – which is false!

Sunday as a day of rest was another declaration of doctrine signed at Nicaea. Emperor Constantine, four years earlier, on March 7th, had already decreed as a political figure: “All judges, city people, and craftsmen shall rest on the venerable day of the Sun (venerabili die Solis).” At Nicaea, the step was taken to integrate Constantine's politics into church dogma. It was then that the concept of “the Lord's day” was formulated and placed in the right of Sunday. As a result, the definitive replacement of the biblical Sabbath (Saturday) with Sunday as the official day of worship and civil rest took place.

Sunday set apart as a day of rest has no argument whatsoever in the Scriptures. It is illogical and irrational for Yeshua as a man to have changed what He had given in ancient times as α-Yeshua in His capacity as the One-who-Is. He himself stated that he did not come to abolish anything, but came to fulfill what He had revealed through the prophets while He was the One-who-Is.

In conclusion, keeping Sunday as a day of worship and rest is based on a false doctrine, on a heresy invented for Constantine's political interests to unify the empire and to separate “Christian” practices from Jewish ones – a matter which also led to the manner of celebrating Easter and the Resurrection (plus other feasts that are not found in Moses and the prophets), based on a calendar that did not have its origin in the Scriptures.

The veneration of icons derived from Nicaea – a derivation from the doctrine of the trinity, argued by the fact that if “Christ was God incarnate” on Earth, this incarnation in the likeness of God allows us to exemplify the divine through images. If “Christ was an icon of God” on Earth, any icon can be a representation of the divine.

The understanding of Echad highlights that Yeshua was the image of Adam and Mary. This understanding is a barrier against icons and statues within “Christianity”; this understanding throws back the veil from the veneration of icons and declares them to be idolatry! The doctrine concerning icons (statues) is a heresy!

In short, if α-Yeshua (the Omniscient), in His capacity as the One-who-Is, chose Abraham (Israel), it is devoid of sense, logic, and reason for Yeshua, in his capacity as a man, to have canceled the covenant between Love and Israel.

In conclusion, all the eschatological prophecies regarding Israel (Jerusalem) will be fulfilled with Israel reborn (resurrected) from dust and ashes, while “Babylon” (the blend of antisemitic traditions and political interests) will fall. “Replacement Theology” is a heresy, guilty of all the blood of the Jews killed out of religious convictions within “Christianity,” and by derivation, within Islam… for we will get to that as well.

Caesaropapism and Heresy as a Civil Offense. At Nicaea, through Constantine's interests, the foundations for the union of Church and state were laid. It was there that the precedent was essentially formulated whereby the political (lay) leader can convene, finance, and impose dogmatic decisions as civil laws of the state.

Also at Nicaea, the foundations were laid whereby deviation from the official Creed is a form of political treason, resulting as a consequence in exile, confiscation of property, or civil punishments (up to burning at the stake, and even beyond). These doctrines are heresies and attack the freedom of conscience and the Law of Free Will.

From Nicaea sprang later on the crusades, the inquisition, the pogroms, and the concentration camps. Nicaea is guilty of an ocean of innocent blood. Nicaea was the mother of all deviations from the truth and from the Scriptures; it was the spring from which antisemitism poured forth, like a delta, into the entire world! Nicaea was one of the Devil's most efficient instruments to intoxicate the entire world with lies and hatred toward those chosen through covenant.

The effects of Nicaea are seen propagated through a demonic system called “Babylon”. In essence, “Babylon” is Nicaea, but it is also more... and in what follows, we will see “Babylon” stripped of any mask.

To go further, we must look upon a prophecy in the book of Daniel, where in chapter 2 a giant image is presented to us. This giant is the image from Nebuchadnezzar's dream, about whose interpretation Daniel says that “it will happen in the latter days.”

The dream showed the image of the giant in the following manner: “You saw a great image. This image, which was mighty and whose brightness was excellent, stood before you; and the form thereof was terrible.”

“This image's head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass, his legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay. You watched as a stone was cut out without hands, which struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces. Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them. And the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth.”

Daniel's explanation was that Babylon was the head of gold, and that after Babylon another kingdom would arise (its breast and arms were of silver), which was Medo-Persia. In the dream, after Medo-Persia, Greece was seen, represented by “its belly and thighs were of brass,” and finally Rome, represented by “its legs of iron; its feet, part of iron and part of clay,” and through the explanation:

“There shall be a fourth kingdom, strong as iron; forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things, and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise. And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided, but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay. And as the toes of the feet were part of iron and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly broken.”

To decipher “Babylon,” we must first understand what this kingdom is about, represented by two legs of “iron mixed with clay,” ending in a sole and toes of “iron mixed with clay.”

This kingdom, as a continuity of the kingdoms that came before it, possesses elements both similar to and different from the other kingdoms that preceded it. It is about Rome, which rose upon the horizon of history over Greece, over Medo-Persia, and over Babylon, inheriting the same principles and a similar behavior.

Unlike Babylon, Medo-Persia, and Greece, which were represented by a single alloy (gold, silver, brass), this Rome is seen at the end of history – the moment when the stone strikes – in a belated attempt to unite two alloys: iron and clay. On the other hand, much like Medo-Persia, which was represented by a chest and two arms, this Rome is seen to be two legs ending in ten toes.

If we were to analyze through the prism of history, Rome never divided into two, although these two legs could be interpreted to be the Papacy and Byzantium, which in terms of political authority were a continuity of Imperial Rome. The prophecy almost allows us to go along with this interpretation; however, we would be hindered by what is represented by the clay... an aspect we will analyze immediately.

On the other hand, in essence, although structured differently at the current moment of history, at the level of doctrine and behavior we can say that today there is no difference between Rome and Byzantium, both retaining traces of iron from the Imperial structure of Rome, both inheriting the historical baggage of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome – which is why, from this moment on, when I refer to the iron (“Rome”), I include them both, although the Papacy is seen in the foreground.

If one of the legs of iron, with iron in a greater measure than the other leg, is “Rome,” if the clay is seen as directly linked to “Rome,” as “springing” from it – just as the Papacy installed itself upon the seat of Nero (666 & 616) – who could be this leg of clay mixed with iron?

We observe that while gold, silver, and brass are non-corrosive metals, iron and clay are vulnerable in the face of rain (water). While metals are found within the mountain, clay is not found in it, but rather is found in abundance within the desert.

Since the interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream has the “latter days” in mind and the moment when the stone cut out from the Mountain strikes the feet – “which struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces” – we have the obligation to identify the clay and the leg dominated by clay.

A kingdom (“Babylon”) which, much like Medo-Persia, is formed of two kingdoms, apparently with no link to one another, like two legs made of iron and clay mixed in unequal proportions, because no mixture of two elements can be identical when it comes to two legs; one is, visibly or not, longer, stronger, more “at the beginning” (dominant).

Which is the kingdom represented by the “leg of clay (and iron)” that dominates the world, just as “Rome” does both on a political and religious plane? Which is the political and religious force that rises to the same level of power as “Rome”? If one of the world's legs is “Rome,” which is the second leg upon which the world rests?

Only a single kingdom fits this description. If “Rome,” through Nicaea and its geopolitical consequences, rose out of Rome, Islam rose immediately after Nicaea out of the desert. If “Rome” carries within itself the traces of iron of polytheistic Rome, Islam carries within itself the traces of the monotheistic desert from which it emerged.

It remains to be seen how Islam is linked to Rome through “Rome” and how together these two leg-kingdoms make up what John saw in vision and described as “Babylon the great, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth.”

The context of the rise of Islam is highly controversial. It is a mystery, at first glance, how this religion of the masses (much like the “Christianity” of “Rome”) appeared all of a sudden and with an extraordinary power, as if Rome had discovered yet another limb for itself in history. The reality is that the leg “of clay” was always in its place, only that the pre-existing iron transformed into clay, in portions and not entirely, unevenly on both legs.

As is well known, Islam started from a single man, in the desert, from a “cave of clay”. On the surface, official history finds no link between Islam and “Rome”... and at first glance, this thing appears to be an axiom just as well constructed as the doctrine of the trinity.

It is said that the papacy, at the time when Muhammad appeared in history, was a weak institution, torn apart by the wars in the boot, that at that time it was an institution subordinate to Constantinople and had neither the resources nor interests in the East. However, all these “arguments” are dust in the eyes, trying to hide the fact that “Rome” at that time was desperate to find a solution to counterbalance Byzantium's influence in the area, that “Rome” desperately wanted Jerusalem.

If they had found a man to play to their interests – one with sufficient charisma, financial power, and a lot of influence – “Rome” would have been willing to play all its cards on him. In this context, Muhammad and his wife were exactly what “Rome” needed.

At that time, commercial relations existed between “Rome” and Arabia along “the Spice Route,” and among the pilgrims traveling from Rome to Jerusalem, there were both merchants and agents loyal to “Rome”; at that time, every bishop or church figure was a more or less qualified spy.

It is a known fact that Muhammad and his wife, Khadija, were highly regarded people, with financial and political influence. Khadija possessed certain qualities that placed her in a suitable position regarding the interests of “Rome.” She was called “Al-Tahira” (The Pure One) and Sayyidat Quraysh (The Princess of the Quraysh) while Muhammad, her husband, was called “Al-Amin” (The Trustworthy One) and “Al-Sadiq” (The Truthful One). They were the perfect candidates.

Furthermore, they were not entirely disconnected from “Christianity”; Khadija's first cousin, Waraqa, was an erudite and ascetic “Christian” scholar, a knower of the Hebrew language, being one of the few scholars in Mecca capable of translating and writing fragments of the New Testament into the Arabic language – he was the first scholar to validate Muhammad's experience.

Another “Christian” figure of significant importance was the monk Bahira (the Monk Sergius), who was the first external, non-Arab, and “Christian” witness to recognize and predict Muhammad's prophetic status when he was approximately 12 years old, as he saw certain “signs” that presented him as a special child – signs such as:

“A small cloud permanently followed the boy, providing him with direct shade against the burning desert sun... When the caravan stopped, the branches of a tree bent unnaturally to shelter Muhammad... Between the boy's shoulders, the monk discovered a distinctive birthmark, which the holy books in his cell described as the ‘Seal of Prophecy’... Bahira confirmed that this physical sign corresponded exactly to the prophecies in the ancient scriptures (the Old and New Testaments) regarding the coming of the last messenger.” (Ibn Ishaq in Sirat Rasul Allah)

Without underscoring that these identifications are pure fiction – at that time, “Christianity” was full of such “special people” (see Saint Francis and Saint Anthony) with “distinctive” signs – it must be emphasized that nowhere in the Scriptures are such signs found regarding any prophet, and that the Scriptures nowhere speak about a “birthmark” of the last prophet. All these are lies invented precisely to give an excess of “prophetic authority” to Muhammad, based on the principle of “accumulating grace” (spiritual gifts), and they indirectly point to “Rome” as having been involved in the crocheting of these “signs” and “wonders.”

The movement or power play around Muhammad reflects rather the interests of a “Rome” blinded by power, which at that time did not take into account the potential geopolitical consequences. If Muhammad had succeeded, by gathering the Arab tribes under a single leader, in conquering Jerusalem in the name of “Rome,” this victory would have forever brought Byzantium to its knees before “Rome.”

“Rome,” at that time, being blinded by the reputation of Muhammad and his wife, did not take dogma into account; furthermore, Muhammad seemed to be easy to keep in check through the promise of a canonization as a saint. If things had unfolded according to “Rome's” plans, today in “Rome's” calendar, “Al-Amin” would have had a day dedicated to him.

History and the Quran contain within them remnants of these intersecting interests – the moment when the first slivers of clay are seen emerging from the iron. History and the Quran preserve traces showing that, at a certain point, the agreement between Muhammad and “Rome” fell through.

It was the moment when Muhammad realized that he could be more than a canonized saint – he could be a “god”. This moment can be identified after the success at Medina, the point at which Jerusalem was no longer the direction of prayer (Qibla), but Mecca – in this way, Muhammad declaring his political and economic independence in relation to “Rome”.

This turn of events placed “Rome” in a position it had not thought of and had not anticipated. This shift of Muhammad on the geopolitical stage, in which the instrument molded for a purpose became a fitting rival, put “Rome” in a life-and-death situation, being responsible for training and setting the stage for a character not only rival, but also capable of putting “Rome” in a dead-end position.

If Muhammad's first wars intersected with “Rome's” interests in the region by destroying Constantinople's imperial centralization, making “Rome” the sole supreme authority in the West, Muhammad's shift on the geopolitical map through interests that excluded “Rome” or were a threat to “Rome's” interests placed “Rome” in a situation of vulnerability before Muhammad and Islam. “Rome” had become open to blackmail, primarily in relation to Byzantium, and indirectly guilty for the loss of vast “Christian” territories (Egypt, Syria, North Africa).

The appearance of the Quran was an unexpected breath of fresh air for “Rome,” which allowed it to negotiate at the blackmail table. Muhammad's claims of being a prophet who brought the world a revelation from the angel Gabriel placed “Rome” in the position to blackmail Islam in return, possessing evidence that Muhammad, before anything else, had been a project of “Rome” – one that had escaped control. From this moment on, both institutions had at hand the instrument with which they could have mutually annihilated each other.

For Islam, the public exposure that Muhammad was initially trained by “Rome” and that for a period the actions of Islam overlapped with “Rome's” interests would have meant the collapse of its “Divine Origin”, by canceling the concept of pure revelation (the Quran descended directly from Allah). Islam would have been shown, in the eyes of the believers, to be a human geopolitical project, as it actually was in reality.

For “Rome,” the public exposure that Muhammad was initially trained by “Rome” to destroy other “Christian” and Jewish factions, the image of the “Bride of Christ” would have been replaced by that of a cynical political operator.

On the other hand, through the fact that both religions base their legitimacy on the control of or access to the holy places, a public exposure of secret agreements (past or present) regarding the administration of Jerusalem would trigger massive riots among fundamentalist believers from both camps, who still believe in a real “holy” war, not in a corporate management of religion.

Recent documents (such as the one from Abu Dhabi in 2019) could be interpreted as a superior stage of this pact, on the logic that instead of risking the secrets of history surfacing through independent research, the leaders decided to merge the narratives. By stating that “all religions are willed by God,” they cancel the need to explain historical contradictions. This is a method of “burying the hatchet” precisely because beneath it lies evidence that would incriminate both institutions.

Today, more than ever, this pact of silence is under pressure. Genetic analyses, ancient manuscripts discovered with new technology, and free access to information are a major risk that could bring to light the connections of blood and interests between “Rome” and the first caliphates. “Rome” and great Islamic leaders collaborate at the UN and in other forums to limit “freedom of expression” under the pretext of combating the “defamation of religion.” In reality, this protects both camps from disturbing historical investigations.

If the world understood that the “Great Conflict” between the Cross and the Crescent was often a staged spectacle to control the masses and redraw borders, both institutions would lose their right to exist. The pact of silence is not about peace, but about immunity in the face of history.

If we look at history through the reality of this “pact of silence,” the Crusades no longer appear merely as wars of conquest, but as a gigantic operation to “clean up” the evidence. In the Middle East, there were ancient “Christian” and Jewish communities (Nestorians, Ebionites, Gnostics) that preserved the oral tradition and documents about the true origins of Muhammad's movement and about his connections with “Rome”. The Crusaders massacred indiscriminately, including Eastern “Christians” and Jews. The destruction of libraries and isolated monasteries in the desert ensured that the “official” version of history, written in “Rome,” remained the only one valid.

The Order of the Templars was officially created “to protect pilgrims”, but their primary activity was excavation beneath the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Although officially there is silence regarding the documents found, the later reality implies that they found evidence showing the secret collaboration between the two legs – the one predominantly of iron and the one predominantly of clay. The fact that “Rome” supported them enormously, only to destroy them suddenly and violently in 1307, suggests that they began to use that evidence to blackmail “Rome” and to create their own power system.

By building churches over mosques and, subsequently, mosques over churches, a confusing archaeological layer was created. This violent “redecoration” of Jerusalem served to erase the traces of previous coexistence or collaboration. The Crusade was the instrument by which a line of blood was drawn so thick that no one could ever suspect that, at the origins, the two powers could have been allies.

On the other hand, nothing hides a secret collaboration better than a bloody public conflict. By declaring Islam as the “supreme enemy,” “Rome” closed the mouth of any internal critic who might have suggested occult links. The Crusade created the necessary historical trauma for the masses of believers from both sides to sincerely hate each other, while the elites at the top continued to manage their common geopolitical interests.

The Crusade was the “broom” that swept away the traces of a historical complicity. It was a necessary blood sacrifice to “concrete” the dogmas and to ensure that the holy land would no longer speak of secrets that are meant to be hidden forever.

This “we are in the same boat” situation offers an explanation for what we observe today rather than mere “diplomacy.” Through the prism of the existence of this historical “pact of silence,” the current collaboration between the Vatican and Iran is not an anomaly, but a logical continuation of an alliance of survival.

In a world dominated today by secularism and technology, the Vatican and Iran are the last great bastions asserting that political authority must come from God (through them). If one of these models falls under the pressure of democracy or “historical truth,” the other remains exposed. Consequently, they protect each other – the Pope remains silent in the face of the massacres in Iran, while Iran offers the Vatican a platform of influence in the East, validating its role as a global mediator. Their hidden collaboration is, in essence, a confidentiality contract renewed through silence in moments of crisis (such as the October 7th attack or the protests in Iran).

For both the Vatican (according to the Nicaea line) and the Tehran regime, a strong and sovereign Israel in Jerusalem is a slap in the face to their theology. Iran uses brute force to destabilize the region, while the Vatican uses “soft power” and UN diplomacy to delegitimize the Jewish state. They wash each other's hands: Iran does the “dirty work” on the ground, while the Vatican provides the moral cover, speaking of “peace” and “the suffering of all,” without ever naming the source of the terror.

In the information age, both institutions fear that the masses will understand that religion has been used as a screen for geopolitical control. Their current collaboration at the level of universities and “dialogue” forums is an attempt to rewrite the narrative in real time. They present themselves as “defenders of morality” to prevent a global investigation into how they managed history and the blood of millions of people in the name of fabricated dogmes.

The “historical shame” is the bond that keeps them today united, as much as iron can be united with clay. If one collapses under the weight of truth, it pulls the other down with it. This “historical guilt” puts them in a forced situation of washing each other's hands (feet), both in the present and in connection with the past that binds them – a past with very bloody traces... traces in which one can see the steps of their ascension from what they were in the past to what they claim to be today: “divine agents” on Earth.

Moving away from the power plays and geopolitical strategies of these two legs on the stage of history – where from one moment to the next the stone will strike the giant exactly on its feet, bringing before our eyes another reality, the one described by the words “then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them” – we must analyze the Quran to see to what extent it overlaps with Nicaea, obviously not on the subject of the trinity, but on the doctrine regarding salvation, or eternal life.

First of all, it must be clarified that there was a massive, vibrant, and extremely complex monotheistic background in the Middle East and throughout the Arabian Peninsula at the moment when Muhammad appeared on the stage. Islam developed on a pre-existing monotheistic background.

At the time of Muhammad, Nicaea had not succeeded in uniformizing “Christianity” on the doctrine of the trinity in that region. “Christianity” surrounded Arabia like a geopolitical horseshoe, but it was not the official “Christianity” of Rome or Constantinople; rather, it was composed of exiled or independent communities.

The Arab kingdoms on the border with the Byzantine Empire were “Christian.” The Ghassanids were Miaphysite “Christians” (persecuted by Constantinople as heretics), and the Lakhmids had adopted Nestorian “Christianity”. In southern Arabia, there existed a powerful “Christian” community in the Najran oasis.

Furthermore, across the strait of the Red Sea lay the Kingdom of Axum (Ethiopia) – a massive “Christian” empire with which the merchants of Mecca had daily connections. The fact that Khadija's cousin (Waraqa) and the monk Bahira were “Christian” scholars confirms that Gnostic and Judeo-Christian theology circulated freely through Mecca.

In addition, Judaism was the oldest and most stable monotheistic religion in the Peninsula. The Jews were not mere travelers, but formed powerful, aristocratic, and well-armed tribes.

Within the Arab tribes of the Hejaz (including Mecca), there existed a class of intellectuals and ascetics called Hanifs. These people had completely rejected polytheism and the worship of idols around the Kaaba sanctuary, yet at the same time, they refused to become Jews or “Christians”. They asserted that they wanted to return to the “pure religion of Abraham,” who was considered the spiritual father of the Arabs through Ishmael.

Figures such as Zayd ibn Amr would go to the Kaaba and publicly cry out against the sacrifices offered to idols. The Quran itself uses the term Hanif as a title of supreme praise, asserting that Abraham was a Hanif, and Muhammad came to restore precisely this original, non-imperial Arab monotheism.

In this context of pre-existing monotheism in which the Quran developed, it goes without saying that Nicaea could not be found in its entirety within it; however, on the subject of salvation, Islam essentially overlaps completely with the theology of “Rome” (Nicaea) regarding salvation. In both religions, the final destination is Heaven or, at the opposite pole, Hell. The concepts of Heaven and Hell, at death or resurrection, are identical. Both religions support or encourage religious martyrdom. The Crusades provided human cannon fodder based on this concept, in both religions.

Both religions consider that salvation without works is impossible. Both “legs” place an institution (or man) as an intermediary between the divinity and the sinner. Both undermine the absolute role of Yeshua's sacrifice as atonement and salvation. If in Islam Yeshua did not die and did not resurrect, in the theology of “Rome” the death and resurrection of Yeshua was not sufficient for salvation, for outside the Church and the sacraments there is no salvation. Both attack the essence of exclusive salvation as a gift from the One-who-Is, received through faith by the sinner who chooses to love the One-who-Is with all his heart, with all his soul, and with all his strength, and to love his neighbor as himself.

What were the chances for these two religions to overlap on the most vulnerable point of doctrine – vulnerable through its importance of life or death? What were the chances for these two institutions to overlap on the manner of worship, namely, by placing man or the institution between the sinner and forgiveness?

Although these two institutions have not openly declared themselves to be the One-who-Is, through their actions they declare themselves to be God, just as the Moon does not openly declare itself to be the Sun, but at the moment of an eclipse that is exactly what it does, placing itself between the Sun and the Earth.

I raise yet another question of logic and reason. Islam declares that the Quran is the “literal, unchanged, and eternal Word of Allah [the One-who-Is].” The question I raise is why did this word come through Gabriel? For my logic and reason enlightened by Echad, the assertion that Gabriel gave the Quran – the “eternal word of Allah” – to Muhammad does not fit the logic and reason of the moment when Muhammad met with Gabriel. Why?

Because, as I showed above, Gabriel was the spokesman of α-Yeshua. The period of time in which Gabriel was active as the spokesman of α-Yeshua was identical to the period of time in which α-Yeshua was active as the One-who-Is. If α-Yeshua was active as the One-who-Is from the “Adam moment” until the “incarnation moment of Yeshua”, the period in which Gabriel was the spokesman of α-Yeshua as the One-who-Is is likewise from the “Adam moment” until the “incarnation moment of Yeshua.”

Muhammad did not receive his Quran within the time boundaries from the “Adam moment” until the “incarnation moment of Yeshua” – time boundaries in which Gabriel was active as a spokesman!

The question arises: who is lying? And there are two possible variants. In the first variant, the one who passed himself off as Gabriel was not Gabriel, but a lying demon. In the second variant, Muhammad is lying when he says he received his Quran from Gabriel. Both variants discredit the Quran from being the “literal, unchanged, and eternal Word of Allah”!

The prophecy of the Scriptures is clear. At the end of history, at the moment when the stone cut out from the Mountain strikes “Babylon” – exemplified by the two legs of mixed iron and clay (“Christianity” and Islam) – all the antisemitic kingdoms that were exemplified by the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar shall become “like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them”, while “the stone that struck the image became a great mountain [Zion] and filled the whole Earth,” for “the God of Heaven shall set up a kingdom [of David] which shall never be destroyed, and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.”

I should say... “Amen!”

Amen!

When you consider that “Israel” is a word invented by God, that God was the first to ever utter “Israel”, we should be careful in what context and how we utter this word or name, because, in essence, within “Isra-El” itself lies the Name of God, and, willy-nilly, in relation to this Name there is always a warning to be careful not to err, a warning, willy-nilly, placed alongside punishment, “for God will not leave unpunished” the one who is careless in this regard.

Furthermore, when you consider the context in which Jacob received this name, as if plucked from the book of victors or the book of life, that situation should make you even more thoughtful about being careful what you do in front of “Israel” and how you choose to utter it.

The context of this word invented by God portrays Jacob on his way home, on the way to the Land of his dreams. Having been away from home for a long time, leaving behind a father and a mother, as well as a twin brother with whom he grew up, Jacob on his return journey meets a Traveler like him, a Traveler whom he believed to be an enemy. Thus they came to wrestle, with clubs or swords, until, at dawn, the Traveler showed signs that He wanted to leave. But Jacob did not let Him go, because the Traveler seemed to be the One who had accompanied him at every step and blessed him throughout his wandering journey.

Stirring in the clasp of hands held by the Traveler, Jacob received a new name, the name of an overcoming, for he wrestled with life, with people, and with God, and he overcame, thus he came to be named by God with the name of Israel.

In the situation where Jacob received the name Israel, a prophecy is hidden. In the man Jacob is hidden both the path of the people called Israel and the final victory, the crowning with the fullness of the meaning of the name “Isra-El”, because like Jacob, Israel wandered far from its Father and its mother, far from its Land of birth, but more than all else combined, it wandered far from the dawn of the Day in which God will place the name of Israel on its forehead as a kiss.

Israel, as a people, has been awaiting the Day when God will declare its victory for thousands of years. However, the very name it bears guarantees that at the dawn of the awaited Day, God will crown it with a crown that will never fade, being everlasting.

Daniel saw that Day, and described it thus: “But in the days of these kings the God of Heaven will set up a Kingdom which shall never be destroyed.”

When you think about these things, you are even more put to thought, asking yourself: “If this is the case, where does all the antisemitism in the World today come from, and how dare it exist?!”

An initial answer would be found in the words: “An enemy has sown this seed in the World.” And you ask yourself: “When?” And the answer comes: “Since the beginning, when Adam and Eve gave up the peace of not knowing evil, when following the breaking of the commandment not to take into their mouths what had been placed under warning of punishment, they chose to walk the path of enmity, the path of pain, the path of thorns and thistles. Then entered the World, through the enmity between those named by God and those named by men, the seed of antisemitism, and hatred, and sin, and murder, and falsehood.”

From the beginning, people positioned themselves in two camps, one with obedience to command, the other without; one with the system of sacrifices and “unceasing”, the other with human inventions of worship, counterfeits, and disobedience; one with commands coming from God, the other with commands invented by humans, or none at all; one with God at the center, the other with man placed above.

Returning to today and all the fuss surrounding Israel, you are inevitably confronted with a perfectly legitimate question: “Given how big the World is, why all this fuss over a country so lacking in volume?!” I mean, isn’t the “Christian” world enough for its own concerns, isn’t the Arab and Muslim world enough for their own concerns? What’s with all this agitation around Israel?

The very unrest around Israel should make one think. Almost everyone became agitated. Ancient Babylon became agitated, Medo-Persia became agitated, ancient Greece became agitated, Rome became agitated... and it is still agitated, it is true in a transvestite form (something old in a new form, something religious in a form of kingdom, something with pretensions of a king in a form of worship).

I see this contemporary fuss around Israel as the agitation of rabid flies mistaking gold for trash. Well, they are somewhat justified in their agitation, as Israel has much gold in God’s promises, some milk (butter), some honey, but certainly no trash.

Today’s flies should at least cast an eye on history, at least dip their finger between its lines a little. They would learn as a warning that the combination of gold and honey is dangerous, even more so now at the dawn of the Day when justice for Israel rises like a burning Sun... woe, woe, woe to the flies caught between gold and the burning Sun!

So you really don’t know? You really haven’t heard? Didn’t anyone tell you? Don’t you know that the Day of the Lord comes as justice for the “Overcomer”, the one called into existence for victory on the Day of the Lord.

Of... all eschatological prophecies depict Israel as the Mountain of God rising above all other empires, the place where justice will be dispensed, that justice awaited for ages, justice in relation to Babylon, justice in relation to Medo-Persia, justice in relation to ancient Greece, justice in relation to Rome and Titus, justice in relation to the Rome of Constantine, justice in relation to the Crusades, justice in relation to the Inquisition, justice in relation to the UN, and justice in relation to all antisemitism.

Yes, God chose a people from whom He made a test for all nations or all gatherings of people. It is obvious that this was the case. All the fuss surrounding Israel is proof. The very fact that against all odds in relation to all the commotion in the World from all times against Israel, Israel has reached the dawn of the Day that brings it reward. What an obstacle course, and what obstacles, the greatest empires, the most comprehensive antisemitic ideologies, and yet, against all odds placed against it, Israel stands on the verge of the moment when God will declare it victorious, as its name implies, for its name was a prophecy, a prophecy toward whose fulfillment it has run for ages.

Yes, Israel received its name in ancient times from the mouth of God, but the name was given more as an investment value in which the One who bet on Israel was God.

History shows us that Israel was not fully Israel; history shows us rather an Israel tried by fire and water, an Israel chased by everyone, an Israel struck from everywhere, an Israel always on the verge of finally falling under the dust left by history in its speed, an Israel rather like a seed hidden in the earth, something placed deep down, something with no chance of success or fruit... but not without hope, not without help.

The truth, the miracle, reality, the direction towards which time moves... everything... the Universe itself... from one moment to the next we will be faced with the moment when Israel will be clothed in the name it bears, just as a bride dresses in the dress she received from birth, although she never had the opportunity, the chance, the joy, the honor to wear it until the moment of the wedding.

Yes, Israel, when it received its name, first received a prophecy, although it was born gold, its brilliance for which it was called to existence was not seen. Why? Because the gold of a nation is its king, because the brilliance of a wedding dress lies in the happiness of the one wearing it before the one who asked for her with a ring... because the value of the name of Israel lies in the God who chose it to be like a son, bride or wife to Him.

Israel’s running has always been not after gold or glitter, Israel’s running has been after the Face of the One who chose it.

Israel, at the moment of its birth, tasted only a drop of the goodness of the One who held it in His arms; in its childhood, Israel merely played a little with the Father, and for ages, even millennia, it wandered far from the mother (the Land) that held it close... yet, moment by moment, Israel was rich in the promise that one Day it would be eternal with the Father, with the mother without end.

Perhaps that had to be the way of Israel, a path full of difficulties, a path with the whole world against it at every step; perhaps that’s how it learned to be victorious; perhaps this path was the only one through which the investment made in it would return with great and good fruits, with endless fruit.

The prophecy says that on that very special Day, what was before a small seed hidden in the earth will become a tree larger than the World from which it bore fruit, because no prophecy spoken by the One without falsehood remains unfulfilled, for He speaks and it is done in less than an instant. Everything is not in relation to “Really?!”, everything is in relation to “Now!” as the command of the One who by His command made everything perfect and full of shine.

In conclusion, the coming Day comes as a reward for Israel, comes as a crown, comes as an everlasting Kingdom!

It is said that time, like light, never loses its purpose. A true statement as long as light doesn't meet a greater light, and time doesn't meet eternity.

These days I'm trying to race time in a marathon, and it seems I have no chance of beating it, even though we're both running in the same direction, towards the light.

And yet I believe that in the face of the light of eternity I will defeat time at the very last second, but until then I try to deal with it in such a way that, by the time we both reach the Light, I will have finished what I started...

I translate rays of Light from the language in which I was born, into the language of the world... but first I negotiate at the gate of the language of many, English...

... and I put here the progress of my race against time... though we are both running towards the Light... to the day when time will remain without... time... but will be a ray of light... and rest... for both of us... under rays of Light.

So... progress looks like this...

English translation finished:

22.06.2025, 23:11

23.06.2025, 20:19

24.06.2025, 17:18

24.06.2025, 23:51

26.06.2025, 21:15

30.06.2025, 05:21

01.07.2025, 07:51

03.07.2025, 15:12

06.07.2025, 22:51

09.07.2025, 19:52

Apparently, it’s a spring, a river, a stream, a delta, an ocean... it all depends on the perspective from which you look, because if “Tomorrow” were to look towards “Yesterday”, it would say that from its sense, going backward to the direction of our movement through time and space, the ocean overflows into the delta, into the stream, into the river, and into the spring, and that from the point of view of “Tomorrow”, with the reality that hasn’t yet arrived, it is right, because, as we said, it’s just about perspective, and “Tomorrow” is richer in accumulated reality than “Today”, just as the ocean is richer than a puddle, than a lake... but not richer than the spring... the spring flows, and it’s unknown from where, since when, and to where...

... the ocean is the only one that knows...

... knows that all things come from a α-Source... and they are!

Generally, there is a lot of confusion regarding the theology of the apostles and what the movement that spread “the good news” represented in the first century, especially up to the year AD 70, when the Temple was destroyed by the Roman armies. It is generally believed that the theology of the eleven disciples of Yeshua is the same “theology” that “Christians” have today, which is totally false!

The history of the apostles’ mission, written by Luke, shows that the disciples, at the time of its writing, had totally different expectations and a totally different vision (philosophy) compared to what is believed today; for example, until the conversion of Cornelius (the Roman centurion – Acts 10:45,47-48), all those who received the Spirit and baptism were only Jews, Jews divided into two categories: Jews (religious Jews) and “Gentiles” (Hellenized Jews, called “Greeks” – Jn 7:35; 12:20; Acts 11:20; 14:1; 17:4; 18:4; 19:10); even the “Ethiopian eunuch” was Jewish in origin (Acts 8:27-28).

While, after Saul’s conversion, Paul (Saul) directed his mission towards all people, and developed a theology adapted to the thinking of the Gentiles, the other apostles focused their attention on the Jews scattered throughout the empire; thus two categories of epistles were written: (a) those of Paul, which addressed certain communities of believers gathered (Gr. “ekklésia” – Acts 8:3; 9:13); synonymous with Heb. “edah” and “miqra” – Exo 12:3,6,16; 12:9) among the Gentiles, and (b) those written by the other disciples (the eleven), which addressed the Jews. This aspect is very important! Why? Because it is forbidden(!) to take words from the Epistle of James addressed to the Jews – “to the twelve tribes who are scattered” – and consider that James’ message is for anyone; it is forbidden(!) to take the words of Peter who addresses the Jews – “to the elect” – and consider that the message “you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation” is for anyone; it’s like trying to take Cinderella’s shoe to put it on any other foot... it’s impossible! It is impossible because Cinderella’s shoe only fits Cinderella’s foot!

Paul (Saul) in his epistle to the Galatians clarifies this, precisely to avoid confusion, he clearly states that there were two types of missions (messages). “For I had been entrusted with the gospel for the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel for the circumcised […] and when they recognized the grace that had been given to me, James and Cephas and John, who are regarded as pillars, gave to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship [the right or permission], that we [Paul and Barnabas] should go to the Gentiles, and they [Peter, James, Cephas and John], to the circumcised.” (Gal 2:7-9)

From the above, it appears that Paul’s epistles (with the exception of “Hebrews”) were written for the Gentiles, while the other writings (James, Jude, John, Revelation) were written for the Jews; in other words, certain things apparently written to all Christians, in reality, only concern the Jews; that is, “Christians” cannot say that they are “a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession” (Peter)! And when John says he saw one hundred and forty-four thousand Jews, it means that he saw exactly Jews, not Gentiles with false pretensions! When John refers to the “the remnant of the woman’s seed”, he is strictly referring to the remnant of Zion – those who keep the commandments of God and have the Spirit manifested through the prophets, those who await the “Kingdom of Israel”.

Clarifying these things, we can better understand why the disciples’ concern on the Mount of Olives, before their Lord’s ascension to Heaven (Acts 1:6), was: “Lord, are you at this time going to restore AGAIN the kingdom to Israel?” This question, formulated in relation to Israel, was not a question born of “traditions” and “wrong” expectations. It is a question that came after forty days in which the Teacher explained the Scriptures regarding “the Kingdom of God” (Acts 1:3), which shows that the Teacher had spoken to them about the kingdom of Israel that was to be “restored AGAIN”, a statement that refers to all the eschatological prophecies about Israel, prophecies synthesized in the words:

“You, who remind the Lord of it [Jerusalem], take no rest! And give Him no respite until He will restore AGAIN Jerusalem and makes it a praise in the Earth!” “I will restore you AGAIN, and you shall be restored, virgin of Israel! You shall again adorn yourself with your tambourines, and shall go forth in the midst of the joyful dances. […] Behold, I bring them back from the land of the north, I gather them from the ends of the earth: among them are the blind and the lame, the pregnant woman and she who is in labor; a great multitude returns here [to Jerusalem]. With weeping they come, and I will lead them in the midst of their prayers; I will lead them to rivers of water, on a smooth road where they will not stumble. For I am the Father of Israel.” (Isa 62:7; Jer 31:4-9)

One of the reasons why there is so much confusion today in “Christianity” and in the World regarding Israel and its prophetic role in eschatological events is that the disciples wholeheartedly believed that in their time of preaching, Israel would be “restored AGAIN” which is why it never occurred to them that after centuries “Christians” would find in their writings “motives” and “arguments” to invent “theologies” they hadn’t thought of at the time, “theologies” like “spiritual Israel” or “replacement theology”, “theologies” that say that God no longer considers His chosen people today, that today “Christianity” is “Israel” (spiritual), and that all the eschatological prophecies that concern Israel and Jerusalem will be fulfilled with “Christians” in an adapted (metamorphosed) form, a kind of “Judaism” travestied as “Christianity”... “theology” which is totally false! That is, a correct understanding of Paul's writings will show how devoid of truth and demonic this “theology” is.

(1) Gal 6:16-17: “For in the Anointed-One Yeshua [the Savior – the Circumcised-One] neither circumcision nor uncircumcision are anything, but to be a new creation. And [a] as for all who will walk according to this, and [b] over the Israel of God, may there be peace and mercy!”

These words do not make all people “the Israel of God” as is believed (assumed), but place all people under “peace and mercy”. Paul separates the people under “peace and mercy” into two categories of people: (a) those who “walk according to this rule [understanding]” that “being a new creation” truly matters, and (b) the Israel of God (with or without this understanding); in other words, “being a new creation” does not make the Gentiles the Israel of God, but offers God’s “peace and mercy” over both some and others.

(2) Gal 3:26: “For you are all sons of God through faith in the Anointed-One Yeshua [the Savior].”

This statement that “all are sons of God” through faith in Yeshua does not make all people Israel, because in Adam all were “sons of God”, and yet, among all, God chose Abraham, and later, from all “sons of God”, God chose a nation which He called “His inheritance” from all the nations of the Earth , “firstborn” of these “sons of God”. (Deu 9:26,29; Exo 4:22; Jer 31:9)

After all, Esau was also a son of Isaac, and Ishmael was a son of Abraham, but this fact (with all their circumcision) did not make them heirs of the promise, nor Israel (whether “spiritual” or not).

(3) Gal 4:5-7: “But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law [the Law that says “the wages of sin is death” – Gen 2:17], so that He might redeem those who were under the Law [condemnation], that we might receive the adoption [rehabilitation]. And because you are sons [redeemed], God sent forth the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, crying out, ‘Abba!’, that is, ‘Father!’”

Again, Paul speaks of the fall of humanity under the condemnation of the Law which says that “the wages of sin is death” (Rom 6:23; Ps 145:20). God, indeed, sent His Son to redeem the World from under this condemnation, and through the atonement made at Calvary, the possibility of being recognized as children of God (as they were at the beginning in Adam) is offered to all again, but this redemption does not make all people the Israel of God, these are totally different things and promises: children are all those redeemed; but the “firstborn”, the chosen and holy nation, is only one: Israel.

God does not change, He sometimes punishes, sometimes withdraws, sometimes leaves you alone so you can learn some lessons, but what He once promised will never change (Jer 33:25-26; 31:37). In other words, all prophecies regarding the future glory of Israel will be fulfilled with a redeemed Israel, not with a so-called and invented “spiritual Israel”.

(4) Gal 4:28: “Now you, brothers, like Isaac, are children of promise.”

Paul draws an analogy between Abraham’s two sons: one from a slave woman, the other from the free woman. He says that the one (Ishmael) born of the slave woman was born in a natural way, while the one (Isaac) from the free woman was born by promise. He continues the argument that the two sons represent two covenants: one “of bondage” from Mount Sinai (“Hagar”) in which all those born into the bondage of the Law (“the wages of sin is death”) are found, while, in contrast, those born from “Jerusalem Above” (“Sarah”) are “free”, for it (she) is the mother of the free (redeemed), and in this freedom, just like Isaac, all people (all those redeemed!) are children of the promise (of salvation). In other words, Paul says that the true heirs of the promise of salvation along with Isaac are those born of Jerusalem Above (“Sarah”); however, this statement does not say that Jacob’s natural sons (Israel) were not born through Jacob and they also from “Jerusalem Above”. Paul omitted to say that from Isaac (the son of “Sarah” – “the free woman”) also came the Edomites, although they never shared in the birth from “Jerusalem Above” nor the promise of salvation. Thus arises the question: who are those born of “Jerusalem Above” (Zion) and the sons of the promise of salvation? The obvious answer is: those born of God! But since in Yeshua all the redeemed are born of God, we arrive at the same conclusion: although all are sons (of the promise of salvation), not all are the firstborn... and at Sinai there was neither Abraham (with the two child-bearers), nor Isaac, nor Jacob; there was Israel, to whom not a man (or mother), but God Himself said: “I have chosen you!”; the same God, the Begetter, the One who is represented to be “Jerusalem Above”, the one who will ultimately be revealed on Earth, the one in whom God Himself will find rest in the midst of the people He has chosen (Joel 3:17-18,20-21; Eze 48:35; Jer 3:17; Zec 2:10)

When the author of the Epistle to the Israel addresses the Jews of his generation, he tells them: “You have not come to a mountain […], nor to the sound of a trumpet, nor to the voice that spoke […], but you have come [in your forefathers] to Mount Zion, to the City of the living God [the Zion of Israel], the Jerusalem with its origin in Heaven […], to the assembly [Hebrew!] of the firstborn, who are written in Heaven by God.” (Heb 12:18-23), that is, he places the birth of the Jews as a chosen people in Zion (“Sarah”), in the Zion that will ultimately be revealed on Earth, the Zion for which Abraham and all the patriarchs longed (Heb 11:10,16), the Zion that will reconfirm the choice of Israel as the firstborn; for the promise of eternal Zion was first made to the Jews: first to Abraham, then to Israel.

(5) Gal 3:27-29: “For all of you who were baptized into the Anointed-One have clothed yourselves with the Anointed-One. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in the Anointed-One Yeshua [the Savior]. If you belong to the Anointed-One, you belong to Abraham’s Seed, and heirs according to the promise.”

Paul, by the above, places all people in the “Anointed-One”; through baptism in His Name, all are set apart for God, and this setting apart does not take into account physical aspects (male or female), social aspects (slave or free), or nationality (Greek or Jew), because in the “Anointed One” all are one and have the same destination (inheritance): salvation. Regarding salvation (eternal life), all people, equally, are in the “Seed” of Abraham, that is, they are in the “Anointed-One” (the “Seed”); but being in the “Anointed One” does not mean being Israel. Adam was in the “Anointed-One”, Enoch was in the “Anointed-One”, Noah was in the “Anointed-One”, but none of them were Israel, nor “spiritual Israel”!

(6) Gal 3:7: “Understand, then, that those who have faith are children of Abraham.”

The statement that “Abraham’s children are those who have faith” does not make Israel out of all people who “believe”, for the physical descendants of Abraham who have faith also exist and are alive, and even more so are the children of Abraham, they are the ones about whom it is said that they will be seen at the end through the words: “They [“Jacob’s children” – 3:6,12,16] will be Mine [...], they will be a special treasure for Me on the day that I am preparing. [...] And you will see AGAIN then the difference between the righteous and the wicked, between the one who serves God and the one who does not serve Him.” (Mal 3:17-18)

Having faith doesn’t make you a Jew, and no “gathering of believers” from among the Gentiles can become Israel!

The statement that the faithful are “sons of Abraham” actually says that Gentiles (“water” from nature) have been given the opportunity, through the Anointed-One, to enter the golden vessel (the container) called “Abraham”, but this “water” will never be “olive oil”. Oil and water can coexist (unmixed) in the same container, but never will “water” be (become) “olive oil”!

“Christianity” cannot understand that what was promised to Israel in Abraham cannot be transferred “spiritually” to any other nation, just as the holy blessing placed upon the Sabbath cannot be transferred to another (“holy”) day. Yes, all days belong to man, Greek or Jew, male or female, free or slave, but the Sabbath belongs to the Lord, a day set apart in which God chose to sanctify His chosen ones; the Sabbath, not another day; Israel, not any other gathering of people, believers or not.

When Yeshua (the Savior) spoke about the reason for His coming – to solve the problem arising from Adam’s fall – He made some clarifying statements regarding how He viewed the relationship between Israel and the Gentiles, statements that – in general – “Christians” ignore: “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Mt 15:24); “Do not go the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter any city of the Samaritans; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” (Mt 10:5-6); “It is not good to take the children’s Bread and throw it to the dogs.” (Mt 15:26); “Let the children be filled first, for it is not good to take the children’s Bread and throw it to the dogs!” (Mk 7:27); “Do not give what is holy to the dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.” (Mt 7:6); “Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man will be accomplished. For He will be delivered to the Gentiles: and will mock Him, and will insult Him, and will spit upon Him, and after they have scourged Him, they will kill Him. And the third day He will rise again.” (Lk 18:31-33); “And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled underfoot by the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.” (Luke 21:24); “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My Name’s sake.” (Mt 24:9)

Generally, it’s good to have a puppy in the house, and it’s no problem if it eats the crumbs that fall from the children’s table, but if that puppy turns into a hungry bully that eats the food placed on the table for the children, and if at some point it goes rabid and starts biting the children, surely that bully’s place will no longer be in the house, because, after all, any loving parent will value their children more than the rabid dog.

What the followers of Yeshua understood in the first century, today’s “Christianity” finds almost impossible to understand, namely that the Jews, through their unbelief at that time, opened a door (lid) for the Gentiles to be called to the same promises to which Israel was called, to the promise of salvation (eternal life); that is, through their unbelief, the Jews allowed the possibility for the Gentiles to be poured by faith into the golden vessel (container) called “Abraham”, but this opening of the container was to be until a certain moment, when the door (lid) of the Gentiles was to be closed, when the container was to be full, from which moment over the “water” of the Gentiles God would pour AGAIN abundantly “olive oil” until in the container there would be, in the end, only “olive oil”, not because the “water” was to transform into “oil”, but because all the “stagnant and dirty water” was to be poured out by replacing it with “fresh and clean oil”. This is the message conveyed by Paul to the inhabitants of “Rome” (“Babylon!” – Rev 18:1-24; Isa 48:20):

“I ask then: Has God rejected His people? Absolutely not! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected His people, whom he foreknew. […] And even they [Jews], if they do not remain in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. For if you were cut from a wild olive tree [stranger to the promise] and grafted, contrary to your nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these [by faith], who are natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree? […] Brothers [Gentiles], so that you will not be conceited, I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery: a partial hardening has come upon Israel until the full number of the Gentiles has come in [Lk 21:24]. And then all Israel [the faithful one] will be saved, as it is written: ‘The deliverer will come for Sion’s sake and will remove [through faith] all ungodliness from Jacob. This will be the covenant [Isa 59:21] that I will make with them when I take away their sins.’ As for the gospel, they [now] are enemies for your sake, but as for election [eternal], they are loved on account of their fathers. For God is not sorry for the gifts [of faith] and the calling he has made.” (Rom 11:1-2,23-24,25-29)

In the same feeling and longing, the question was raised by the disciples: “Lord, are you at this time going to restore AGAIN the Kingdom to Israel?”, a question that, through “restore” and “again” (Acts 3:21), sends us elsewhere: to Elijah. Why? Because Yeshua spoke exactly in these words about Elijah who “truly must come” or “will come”.

“Elijah will come and restore AGAIN all things.” “It is true that Elijah must come first and restore AGAIN all things.”... statements that are only understood in the present context, when the dogs have gone completely mad, and have no other desire than to devour the children whom God has chosen; when more than ever someone must put things in order and clean up all things [Mt 3:12; Lk 3:17; Mt 13:30], but especially in “theology”, “theology” which, in general, is a source of a great deal of lies and, to an exaggerated extent, a source of antisemitism!

Even regarding Elijah, “Christians” have found “spiritual” explanations and fulfillments, as a “spiritual Israel” could only fit a “spiritual Elijah” or a so-called “fulfillment” of the promise of Elijah’s coming through the mission and activity of John the Baptist, who indeed came in the “spirit and power of Elijah”, but who did not fulfill absolutely no word of God’s message regarding what Elijah was to do, namely: “Behold, I will send you the prophet Elijah in the dawn of the Lord’s Day, that great and terrifying Day. He will restore AGAIN the Father’s love upon His sons [Israel] and the love of the children [of Israel] to their Patriarch, for otherwise, at My coming, I would reap even My own Land with the sickle of destruction.”... prophecy not fulfilled at all by John the Baptist, because in his time, Israel did not recognize its God incarnate in Yeshua, because as a result of his (“failed”) mission, Israel experienced the sickle of destruction, it is true that it was softened by mercy; but more than ever in history, Israel knew disaster through the destruction of the Temple in the year AD 70 by the armed gentiles. If we were to analyze the result of John the Baptist’s mission through the prism of the prophecy regarding Elijah, it would be a total disaster, a failure of colossal proportions. But Yeshua did not refer to John the Baptist looking into the future towards the moment of “restoration AGAIN all things”, looking into the future towards the moment of “restoration AGAIN the Kingdom of Israel”... praise the LORD!

“In that day, the branch of the LORD will be full of radiance and glory, and the fruit of the Land will be rich in radiance and beauty for the saved of Israel. And those who are left in Zion, those who are left in Jerusalem [Mt 24:40; Lk 17:34,36], will be called holy, all who are written among the living in Jerusalem.” (Isa 4:2-3)

So... Amen!

At first glance, this statement is not only absurd and nonsensical, it also sounds insane. How exactly could the Devil invent a concept that has been the basis of hope for generations of believers for millennia? And yet... what if this concept, as it is understood today, is actually a lie rooted in the “father of all lies” and has nothing to do to with what the Scriptures actually teach? Don’t you think that what you believe (or perhaps don’t believe) about “eternal life” might be a lie invented “in hell”?

I challenge you to read just a few paragraphs from the argumentation, and I guarantee you’ll be faced with a surprise of such proportions, as vast as the entire Scripture. Are you ready for a challenge you’ve never faced before? Are you ready to look at the Scriptures with eyes other than the habitual? Are you ready to examine your beliefs on this subject, specifically what “Heaven” is and what “eternal life” is? And you could answer me that “This is eternal life: that they may know You, the only true God”... exactly!... exactly what it’s about: the only God, the truth, knowing exactly what the Scriptures say about “Paradise”. What?

First of all, let’s take a brief look at what is generally believed in “Christianity” (even in Islam). It is said that “paradise” is the final destination after death, as a reward for the faithful, a reward received at death (“in spirit”) or after resurrection, and this place is somewhere in “heaven”, in the “kingdom of heaven”, the Place where God is, somewhere not on Earth, or not in this reality (dimension).... this is the general belief, simplified as for kindergarten. Well... this “belief” doesn’t even have a single verse from the Scriptures to support it! Meaning it’s so “generally accepted” that it doesn’t even cross anyone’s mind to critically and objectively analyze this lie, because in essence, it is one of the oldest and most effective lies invented by the Devil. How so? As I said: there isn’t even a single verse in the Scriptures to stand at the base of this... “teaching” with origin in “Rome” (the Papal one).

Are you ready to be shocked by the truth? By the simple and pure truth of the Scriptures! Let's see...

As I said, one of the biggest lies of “Rome” is that man – (whether as soul or body) either at death or resurrection – will go to Heaven (the Place where God is). However, there is not even a single argument in all of Scripture for such an understanding! One of the “key arguments”, the cornerstone of this lie, lies in a misunderstanding of the following statement: “Do not let your hearts be troubled. Believe in God; believe also in Me. In My Father’s House are many dwellings. If it weren’t so, I would have told you. {1:}I am going to prepare a place for you.{:1}*. And after {2:}I go and prepare a place for you{:2}, {3:}I will come back{:3} {4:}and I will take you with Me, that where I am, you may be also{:4}.” (Jn 14:1-3). Confusion arises from a misunderstanding of what was meant by the statement “in My Father's House”, understanding “argued” by the Place (Heaven; “the House”) where the Son of man** has gone, but the argumentation is false, because whenever the Son of man used these words in other situations He was referring strictly to Jerusalem and His Temple: “Why were you looking for me? Didn’t you know that I must be in My Father’s House?”, “Take these things away; stop turning My Father’s House into a house of merchandise!” (Lk 2:49; Jn 2:16).

Generally, there is much confusion regarding {4}the return of the Son of man{:4} and regarding {5:}the prepared dwellings{:5}... There’s a complete misunderstanding regarding what was meant by the statement “that where I am, you may be also”, a statement that in “Aramaic” (Hebrew!) was expressed slightly differently, but with an entirely different meaning: “that {57:}where I will be, there you may be also{:57}”, a statement synonymous with “Then I looked, and behold, the Lamb was standing {35:}on Mount Zion and with Him{:35} were one hundred and forty-four thousand [...] before the Throne.” (Rev 14:1-3); a statement synonymous with “I have other sheep that are not of this fold; {3:}I must bring them also{:3}. They will listen to My voice, {5:}and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.{:5}” (Jn 10:16); a statement synonymous with “I will come to the aid of My sheep, so they will no longer be plunder, and {34:}I will judge between one sheep and another{:34} [Mt 25:32-33]. {35:}I will put over them one shepherd{:35}, who will feed them, namely My servant David; he will feed them, he will be their shepherd. {357:}I, the Lord, will be their God, and My servant David will be a prince among them{:357}. I, the Lord, have spoken!” (Eze 34:22-24); a statement synonymous with “I will give them {57:}in My House and within My walls a dwelling place{:57} and a better name [...] {7:}I will give them an everlasting name{:7}, which will not be extinguished* [...] {3:}I will bring them to My holy Mountain{:3} and I will fill them with joy in My House [...] {3:}I will also gather other peoples to those who are gathered now from it{:3}.” (Isa 56:4-8)

In fact, {4:}all eschatological (messianic) prophecies{:4} speak of the gathering of all the chosen ones in Jerusalem, while the House of the Lord is depicted as {34:}triumphant and above all kingdoms{:34} present or past in history, because “In the days of those kings {34:}the God of Heaven will set up a Kingdom that will never be destroyed{:34} and this Kingdom {57:}will never pass under the rule of another people{:57}. {4:}It will crush all those kingdoms [on Earth] and bring them to an end{:4}, {57:}but will itself endure forever [on Earth]{:57}.” In this sense it is said that: “The holy ones of the Most High {34:}will receive the Kingdom{:34} and will rule the Kingdom {57:}forever and ever{:57}.” “And the dominion, the rule, and the greatness of the kingdoms [of the Earth] that are under the whole heaven {34:}shall be given to the people of holy ones of the Most High{:34}. His kingdom [of the prince] is {357:}an everlasting Kingdom [on Earth]{:357}, and all dominions {3:}shall serve and obey him{:3}.” because “{34:}The Kingdom of the World{:34} has passed into the hands of our Lord and of His anointed.” because “In the last days, {3:}the Mountain of the Lord’s House will be established as the highest mountain{:3}, it will be raised above all hills, and the peoples will stream to it. [...] He [the prince] will judge between many peoples, and will settle disputes for mighty nations far away. {3:}They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks{:3}; nation will not lift up sword against nation, nor will they learn war anymore, but {357:}each will sit under his own vine, with no one to make them afraid{:357}.”; for the words about the son of David will be fulfilled: “In his days the righteous will flourish, and there will be abundance of peace {6:}until the moon shall not give her light{:6}. He will rule from sea to sea and from the river to the ends of the earth. [...] All kings will bow down to him, all nations will serve him. [...] There will be an abundance of wheat in the land, even to the top of the mountains [...] {357:}the people will flourish [Isa 40:11] in the cities like the grass of the earth{:357}. His name will endure forever; {7:}as long as the Sun holds his name{:7}.”... so that the words which God spoke to David, His servant, as an everlasting covenant, would be fulfilled: “Once I swore by My holiness – I will not lie to David! His seed {7:}shall endure forever{:7}; his throne shall be {357:}before Me like the Sun{:357}; as the Moon {357:}it shall be established forever{:357}, like the faithful witness from above.” “When your days are fulfilled and you lie down with your fathers [in the grave], {3:}I will raise up an offspring [a branch] after you, who will come from your body [your lineage], and I will establish his Kingdom{:3}. He shall build a House for My Name [Zec 6:12-13], and {57:}I will establish the throne of his Kingdom forever{:57}. I [Son of man] will be his Father, and he [son of Man] shall be My son. If he commits evil, I will punish him with a rod of men and with strokes of the sons of men; but My steadfast love will not depart from him [...] {357:}but your house and your Kingdom [through him] shall be made sure forever before Me, and your throne [through him] shall be established forever{:357}.” (Dan 2:44; 7:18; 7:27; Rev 11:15; Mic 4:1-4; Ps 72:7-17; 89:35-37; 2Sam 7:12-16)

This is the only correct understanding regarding the Kingdom – the Place of “prepared dwellings”; “the House” of the holy ones (saved) –, a Kingdom that {3:}has its beginning during the time of the present kingdoms{:3}, kingdoms that will bow before the eternal Kingdom that God {357:}will raise on Earth{:357}; in other words, there is a continuity and a transfer of power from the current kingdoms (and those that have passed in history) to the eternal Kingdom that was promised to David. This is the only correct understanding of the following eschatological [regarding the end] and, at the same time, messianic [regarding the Lord’s anointed] prophecy: “{3:}A Branch will spring up from the stump of Jesse [David’s father], and a Shoot will sprout from his roots{:3}. The Spirit of the Lord will rest on him, [...] and his delight will be the fear of the Lord. [...] He will strike the earth with the rod of his [Lord’s] word and with the breath of his lips he {4:}will slay the wicked [pronouncing his Lord’s judgment]{:4}. [...] {57:}Then the wolf will dwell with the lamb [...] They will neither harm nor destroy on all My holy Mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea{:57}. In that day the branch of Jesse will be a banner for the peoples; the nations will seek him out [the word of the Lord spoken through him], and {57:}the Dwelling-of-Glory will be his dwelling{:57}. [...] He will lift up a banner for the nations, {3:}He will gather the exiles of Israel, and will assemble the scattered of Judah{:3} from the four corners of the Earth.” “In that day, the Branch of the Lord {357:}will be full of majesty and glory{:357}, and the fruit of the land will be {357:}full of brilliance and beauty{:357} for the saved of Israel. And the one remaining in Zion, the one left in Jerusalem, {357:}will be found holy{:357}, anyone who will be written [in the book of life] among the living [the saints alive together with the saints resurrected in the first resurrection], {3457:}in Jerusalem{:3457}. [...] The Lord {35:}will establish [His Glory], over the whole extent of Mount Zion and over its places [of Mount Zion] of assembly, a cloud of smoke by day and a fire of bright flames by night{:35}. Yes, over all {35:}the Dwelling-of-Glory will be a shelter, a dwelling{:35}, a shade against the heat of the day and a protection against the storm and the rain.” (Isa 11:1-10,12; 4:2-3,5-6)

“I [the Lord – the Lion of the tribe of Judah] look quietly from {3:}My dwelling{:3} {4:}through the scorching heat [...] in the flame of the Harvest{:4}. [...] He {4:}will cut off the fruitless branches with sickles all at once, even the shoots [without fruit], and will cast them [to the ground]{:4} [a]. And the Assyrians [the inhabitants of {2:}“Babylon”{:2}] {4:}will thus be left as prey for the birds of prey from the mountains{:4} [b] {4:}and the beasts of the earth{:4} [...] {35:}At that time{:35} offerings will be brought to the Lord of Hosts {3:}by the strong and powerful people{:3}, by the people that are {3:}terrible from their beginning{:3} [c], a powerful nation, {3:}which crushes everything{:3} [d] and whose land is {57:}cut by rivers{:57} [e]; there the [gifts for the Lord] will be brought, there {357:}where the Name of the Lord of Hosts will dwell, on Mount Zion{:357} [f].” (Isa 18:4-7)

“{4:}In that day{:4} the Lord will punish from Heaven the host [of demons originating] from Above, and on Earth, the kings of the Earth [who put their hope in them]. {4:}These will be gathered [as in bundles]{:4} as prisoners of war [a war started in Heaven and continued on Earth] and {4:}placed in a prison, they will be locked in jail cells{:4} [a] and, {6:}after a great number of days [a thousand years], they will be punished{:6} [b]. The Moon will be covered in shame, and the Sun in terror, when {7:}the Lord of Hosts will reign on Mount Zion, in Jerusalem, shining with glory before His ‘elders’*{:7} [* young ones with days without end, for death will no longer be for them].” (Isa 24:21-23)

Because of the indoctrination made from its very beginnings by {2:}“Rome” (the contemporary “Babylon”){:2}, for “Christianity” (and indirectly for “Islam”), drunk and poisoned, it is almost impossible to understand that during the millennium (and eternity) {57:}the Kingdom of Heaven{:57} in reality is {3:}the Kingdom of the chosen and the holy ones{:3}, {35:}the Kingdom of the great emperor{:35}, {35:}the Kingdom of the one hundred and forty-four thousand of the twelve tribes of Israel{:35}, {35:}the Kingdom of the great multitude of any nation, of any tribe, of any people and of any language attached to Israel{:35}, {0:}the Kingdom lost in Eden{:0}, {7:}the eternal and redeemed Kingdom of God on Earth{:7}; for it is this that is spoken of in the words of prayer: {34:} “Your Kingdom come [on Earth]; Your will be done: as in Heaven, so on Earth!”{:34}... in other words: “I put My words in your mouth, and I cover you with the shadow of My hand, {7:}to stretch out new Heavens and to establish a new Earth [at the end of the millennium]{:7}, and {3:}to say to Zion [at the beginning of the millennium]: You are My people!{:3}”, “For as {7:}the new Heavens and the new Earth which I will make shall remain before Me{:7} – says the Lord – {34:}so shall your seed and your name remain{:34}.” (Isa 51:16; 66:22)

“Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised {57:}in the City of our God, upon His holy Mountain{:57}! Beautiful height, the joy of the whole Earth, is Mount Zion in whose north lies the City of the great king [I will establish him forever in My House (on My holy Mountain) – 1Chr 17:14]. God in His royal dwelling places is revealed as a stronghold; {4:}for as the kings had gathered [to besiege the Holy City], they also passed by together; they looked at it and were terrified; they were frightened and fled [Rev 6:12-17]. Terror seized them [...] they were driven away as if by the east [sunrise] wind{:4} [a] [...] Just as we had heard, so we have seen in the City of the Lord of Hosts, in the City of our God, God’s Building to endure forever.” “God, the very God – the Lord of lords! – {4:}calls to the inhabitants of the Earth from the rising of the Sun to its setting{:4}; {5:}from Zion – the perfection of beauty – God shines forth{:5}. Our God does not come in a whisper; a consuming fire is trooping before Him, and a mighty tempest plays around him. He cries out to the Heavens above and down to Earth, {34:}to justify His people: 'Gather to Me My consecrated ones, who made a covenant with Me by sacrifice!'{:34} {4:}Then the heavens will roll down His justice to the Earth, for God is the One who judges{:4}.”... He who sits on His Throne... {05:}“Throne of Glory, lifted up from the beginning, Place of our Holy Place!{:05} O Lord, the Hope of Israel, {4:}all who forsake You will be covered in shame [ashes]!”{:4}... but us, You give us Your peace... because… “There is a river whose streams gladden {57:}the City of God, the Holy Place of the dwellings of the Most High{:57}. God is in its midst; {357:}it shall never be shaken{:357}; {4:}God helps it at the morning dawns when the nations will be in turmoil, the kingdoms will crumble, when His Voice will resound, and the inhabitants of the Earth will melt in terror{:4}. [...] But we are not afraid even if the Earth should shake, even if the waves of the sea roar and foam and rise up to the point where the mountains tremble. [...] {34:}For God [in His City] is our refuge and our support, a faithful helper who has always been present in times of trouble{:34}.” (Ps 48:1-8; 50:1-6; Jer 17:12-13; 46:4-6,2-3,1)

Let’s pause for a moment... to reflect just for a moment on the information provided by the prophets regarding this “City of the Lord”, “Mount of Zion”, “House of God”, “beautiful Height”, “joy of the whole Earth”, “God’s Building to endure forever”, “Building of perfect beauty”, “Lifting-up from the beginning”, “Place of the Holy Place”, “City gladdened by springs”, “Holy Place of holy (royal) dwellings”, “City (Tower) of refuge”, “Unshakeable City”, “Throne of Glory”. At first glance, we can ascertain one thing for sure: This City (Fortress) does not exist today and, without error, the prophecies describe it as being present on the heights of Jerusalem only “at the end”, only at the moment when {34:}God will arise to vindicate His people{:34} and {4:}to save them in the most terrible moment in history when the nations will desire their extinction more than ever{:4}. There is a close connection between the Eternal Kingdom and this City of Zion; in fact, they are the same thing. The City of the Mountain is not only the Place in the midst of which the Lord’s presence will be manifested – Shekhinah – but it is exactly the Place where God will dwell eternally in the midst of the holy people, re-clothed in the “from the beginning” glory of Adam and Eve, a glory absorbed from {0:}God’s “from the beginning” presence with them{:0}. In fact, in reality, this “City of Zion”, this “beautiful Height”, this “Building of God”, this “joy of the whole Earth”, “Perfect Beauty”, “High-Place from the beginning”, “Throne of Glory”, this “City gladdened by springs” IS EXACTLY THE LOST PARADISE, redesigned (“prepared” for the chosen ones, or made differently: with many dwelling-places for all who will be saved). In other words, God will once again, eternally, place Paradise in Jerusalem, a Place with many dwellings, a Place with God’s House and Throne in its midst, a Place on Mount of Zion, on the north side of which will be the City (House) of the great king [a]: the branch [b], the son of Man [c], the descendant of David [d], the firstborn (adopted one) [e] from the all kings of the Earth, the heir [f] to all of God’s wealth.

When we think of the “Garden of Eden” and Adam and Eve, we tend to see “a simple garden of vegetables and fruit trees” and some miserable, backward, naked, poor, and stupid people... well, we are sorely mistaken because “the garden of the land of abundance” was more than “a simple garden”, that within its boundaries held the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil; and Adam and Eve were more than the first people on Earth, more than some peasants without much knowledge... because that’s what we generally think of when we imagine Adam and Eve: some fools tricked in a garden by a banal snake perched in a tree.

The shocking truth is that only when we understand what the {0:}”Garden of Eden”{:0} was, and who Adam and Eve were, do we truly understand both the {2:}abyss into which humanity fell{:2} through their fall into sin, and the {57:}“future glory” of those found written{:57} in the inheritance lost by the first humans, but redeemed by God through sacrifice; namely, of those {34:}found written in the book of life{:34}.

Apparently, there is little information about {0:}”the Garden of Eden”{:0}... in reality, there is enough: (a) “The Lord God planted a garden in Eden [Abundance], toward the east [sunrise], and there He put the man whom He had formed. The Lord God made to grow out of the ground [in the “garden”] every tree [...] A river was going out of Eden to water the garden [...] The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and watch over it.” (Gen 2:8-10,15); (b) “The Lord God made [on the fifth and sixth days] from the ground all the animals of the earth and all the birds of the sky and brought them to the man [on the sixth day], to see how he would name them [...] and man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the sky, and all the beasts of the field.” (Gen 2:19-20); (c) “Then the Lord God made a woman [from one of Adam’s ribs] and brought her to the man.” (Gen 2:21-22); (d) “And the Lord God [after the fall] made for Adam and his wife garments of skin and clothed them.” (Gen 3:21); (e) “The Lord God drove out [Adam (and Eve)] from the Garden of Eden [...] and at the east [sunrise] of the Garden of Eden He placed cherubim with a flaming sword to guard the way to the tree of life.” (Gen 3:23-24)

At first glance, things are simple and clear... meaning: God made a garden, some trees grew, there was a river there, people were initially naked “and were not ashamed” (Gen 2:25), then they made a mistake of eating an apple (or whatever it was) and afterwards they were banished... simple!... NOT REALLY! Why? Because beyond the words seen at a superficial glance there is hidden some information that should make us think, meaning we should ask ourselves a few questions:

1. Why is the word used for “garden” in Hebrew “gan”, derived from “ganan” (to protect, to cover, to defend, to surround)?

2. Why is the verb “to plant”, Hebrew “nata” (to plant, to insert, to fix inside), used for what God did with the “garden”?

3. What does “toward the east [sunrise]”, Hebrew “qedem” (in front, before, east, sunrise) mean? “Towards the east [sunrise]” in relation to what? Or “towards the east [sunrise]” with what?

4. Why is the verb “to put”, Hebrew “suwm” (to put, to install, to establish, to enthrone) used in the case of Adam?

5. If the “Land of Abundance” was chosen for the “garden”, why was it necessary for God to make “grow” from the ground all sorts of trees, Hebrew “tsamach” (to sprout, to bear fruit, to grow)? More precisely, if from the third day of the Earth’s life modeling, “the ground brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed of every kind, and trees of every kind bearing fruit with the seed in it, of every kind” and if “the Land of Abundance” was chosen for the “garden”, why was it necessary for God in the “garden” on the sixth day to repeat the operation that he had just done on the third day, when everything he had done on the third day “was very good [perfect]” (Gen 1:12-13)?

6. Why was it necessary for a river to flow out in Eden (Abundance), and from where, to water the whole “garden” through its “four branches”, when at that time (until the Flood) “a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground” (Gen 2:6)? Why this way of watering the face of the earth wasn’t valid in the Garden?

7. If it is understood that the man “placed” (Heb. “yanach”: to be installed, to be invested, to be put in charge) in the Garden was given the responsibility “to work” (Heb. “abad”: to serve, to work, to rule, to keep, to guard; as a “servant” or “minister”, or “empowered”) the Garden, the question still arises: what was meant by the expression “to watch over” (Heb. “shamar”: to guard, to watch, to protect, to secure, to conserve, to take care of/supervise/protect)? In connection with what or whom was Adam supposed to be vigilant when he was alone on Earth; at that time even Eve had not been brought into existence?

8. What does it mean that Adam “named” (Heb. “qara”: to name, to read, to call, to proclaim, to define) “with names” (Heb. “shem”: to be named, to be defined, to have a distinction/character/authority/uniqueness) all living creatures in the heavens and on earth? And what does it mean that among all the living creatures that received names, for man was found no “suitable helper” (Heb. “ezer neged”: a supportive/resisting/complementary/strengthening helper)? What does it mean that the woman he named “Eve” (Heb. “Chavvah”: pro-life, source of life, to give (form to) life, to put into life, to show life, to spring up/blossom life) was found to be “ezer neged” (exactly the necessary helper)? For (to do) what?

9. What does it mean that the woman was made from “that specific rib”? In Hebrew, “eth tsela” (rib) (“eth” has the property of emphasizing the uniqueness/particularity/necessity of being). Why does it seem that, unlike Adam, Eve (“life in living form”) came into existence in the Garden of Eden? What is the connection between the name that she emanated – as Adam defined it – and the Garden of Eden?

10. Why does it seem that as a Father, God took care to clothe Adam and Eve only after the fall, in “garments of skin” (Heb. “kthoneth owr”: tunic, long garments; made of skin/fur)? Or were they clothed from the day of their creation with clothes, and what kind of clothes could the Garden offer them (which later undressed them due the forbidden tree) besides those made of leaves chosen by them after the fall? With the fur of which animal were the two clothed? Why fur, and not leaves (why Abel, and not Cain)?

11. Why were they driven out of the Garden and why did God place as guardians on the way to the east (sunrise: “qedem”) towards the tree of life “those specific (two) cherubim” (“eth kruwb”) to wield “that specific flaming sword” (“eth lahat chereb”)? Wasn’t one angel enough? Why cherubim? Who were those specific two guardian cherubim? And which unique and specific sword that pours out fire?

Undoubtedly, the above questions highlight the fact that “The Garden of Eden” was more than just a vegetable garden and fruit trees. The path guarded by exactly the two cherubim that were later outlined in gold on the Cover of the Ark of the Covenant, the guarding sword seemingly made of the same flame of the burning bush, the repetition of the fact that it is about the path from the east (sunrise); the fact that although it was a “garden” one could not reach the tree of life by any other path and the place where the river that watered the Garden originated, all these highlight that this Garden had properties of a Citadel. In fact, the very name of Eden, which means “delight, pampering, delectation, luxury, abundance, happiness, satisfaction”, makes us wonder if perhaps the Garden of Eden originated elsewhere than on Earth, if perhaps its origin is in Heaven, the place where initially the war between good and evil began, and later moved to Earth.

Somehow the description of the Garden reveals all the necessary elements to find similarities between {0:}the Garden of Heaven (Eden){:0} and {7:}the City of Zion{:7}, that is, it helps us understand that the City (Garden) which was hidden at the Flood (Mt 13:44; Hag 2:6), {345:}will be revealed again at the end{:345}; The Fortress (Garden) planted deep in the Earth will be planted again (Zec 14:4; Gen 13:14-17; Eze 48:1-35; Nah 1:5-8) in the Earth forever; The Garden – originating in Heaven – in which God was directly present in the company of Adam, will be at the end brought back to Earth {357:}so that God may be present forever among His chosen people{:357}; The Garden where were at first the tree of life and the river of life, will be again {357:}in the form of a Fortress forever on Earth{:357}; the place where Adam (“son of God”) manifested his authority as King (giving names to the creatures of the Earth and the people on it: Eve, Cain, Abel, Seth, etc.), will be again on Earth as the Place where the Prince, the son of David, the Branch, will manifest his authority; the Heavenly City in which Adam as a priest brought the first sacrifices from the fur of which God made the clothes with which they covered their nakedness, will be again on Earth as the City of Zion in which the Prince will be a priest before the Holy One together with the one hundred and forty-four thousand (“sons” of Zadok; Heb. Righteous) and the sons of Levi.

In fact, {0:}the Garden of Heaven on Earth{:0} is nothing other than {57:}the Temple City{:57} which (with the necessary modifications: “I go to prepare a Place /the Kingdom/ for you”) Ezekiel saw in a vision, situated on a “very high mountain” “like a walled City”, because “a wall surrounded the Temple on the outside and all around”... it was {057:}the City of the Garden of Zion{:057}, whose gate mentioned and re-mentioned is “the eastern [sunrise] gate”; a City with “guard chambers” (with or without cherubim); a City full of dwellings for its inhabitants, the servants of the Lord (like Adam, designated to work and guard it); a City with tables for eating and drinking (“that you may eat and drink at My table” - Lk 22:30); a city prepared for singers; a City with the House of the Lord in its midst; a City with walls that around the House were “covered with cherubim and palm trees; between two cherubim was a palm tree; each cherub had two faces, a face of man turned towards a palm tree on one side, and a face of Lion on the other side” (“and a perfect union will be between them both” – Zec 6:13); a City in which “the glory of the Lord entered by the gate facing east [sunrise]” and “the house was filled with the glory of the Lord”; a City where will be the Lord’s Throne, where He will dwell forever “in the midst of the children of Israel”; a City in which there will be no more death (Eze 43:7,9); a City situated on the top of a Mountain, and “the whole place surrounding it will be Most-holy”; a City whose eastern [sunrise] gate of the Temple “shall be shut, and none shall pass through it [...] as for the Prince [eternal High Priest; Zadok], the Prince himself shall sit there to eat bread before the Lord.”; a City in which no “uncircumcised foreigner in heart and uncircumcised in body” shall enter (“For there shall no more come into you the uncircumcised or the unclean.” – Isa 52:1; 35:8); a City from under whose threshold of the House towards the east (sunrise) a river will flow, on whose banks there will be a multitude of fruitful trees, whose leaves “will not wither and whose fruits will not end; every month they will bear new fruits”, “because the waters will come out of the Temple; their fruits will serve as food, and their leaves, as medicine”; a City with twelve gates, after the names of the sons of Israel; a City with four equal sides (each side having 750 reeds or, in reality, 108 km) whose “name” (emanated) will be “The Lord is here”.

Of course, this {0:}City of the Heavenly Garden{:0} or this {357:}City of Zion{:357} is not {7:}“the (City of) New-Jerusalem”{:7} (as seen by John), because the City of Zion {34:}will be revealed at the beginning of the thousand years{:34}, while “the New-Jerusalem” will come down from Heaven {7:}at the end of the thousand years{:7}; the first has a side of 750 reeds (108 km) and surrounds the House of the Lord (the Temple), the second has a side of 12,000 reeds (1,728 km) and has no Temple. In fact, “the New-Jerusalem” will encompass within its walls the City of Zion along with its holy Mountain, on the north side of which will be “the City of the Great-king”, also within the walls of “the New-Jerusalem”.

A fair question arises, namely: is there any information in the Scriptures to confirm the statement that the City of Zion (Eden) will be within the walls of “the New-Jerusalem” on Earth? The answer is that not only in one place do we have this information, but the entire Scripture directly or indirectly testifies in favor of this statement. First of all, we have the following words: “And I saw the Holy City, the New-Jerusalem, coming down out of Heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne [of David] saying, ‘Behold, {57:}the Dwelling place [the Tabernacle/Tent/Zion] of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be His people, and God himself will be with them as their God.{:57}’”… statement synonymous with “For {34:}He will shelter me in His Dwelling in the day of trouble [the beginning of the millennium]{:34}, He will hide me {34:}under the shelter of His Tent and will lift me up on a Rock{:34}. Behold, my head is lifted up {4:}above my enemies who surround me{:4}; {34:}I will offer sacrifices in His Tent [Zion] in the sound of the Trumpet [in the day of judgment], I will sing and praise the Lord{:34}.” (Ps 27:5,6)... statement synonymous with “In that time [the beginning of the millennium] the Branch [son] of the Lord will be {3:}full of majesty and glory{:3}, and the fruit of the land will be {3:}full of brilliance and beauty for the saved of Israel{:3}. And the one remaining in Zion, the one left in Jerusalem, {34:}will be declared holy, whoever is called [from the book of life] as alive in Jerusalem{:34}. [...] The Lord will place {3:}over all the extent of Mount Zion{:3} and over its places of assembly, {3:}a cloud of smoke by day and a fire of bright flames by night{:3}. Yes, {3:}over all the Dwelling of Glory there will be a Shelter, a Booth [a Dwelling], a Tent [Hebrew “cukkah”: Tabernacle]{:3} against the heat of the day, a Place of escape against the storm and rain. [Then will be sung to the Beloved] {45:}I will sing to my Beloved the song of my Beloved concerning His Vineyard.{:45}” (Isa 4:2-3,5-6; 5:1)... statement synonymous with “{3:}Multiply the people, O Lord!{:3} Multiply the people [Rev 7:9], {:34}show Your [Dwelling] glory{:34}; {3:}restore all the borders of the land!{:3} {4:}Lord, they sought You when they were in trouble [besieged by enemies; beginning of the millennium] [...] May Your dead live again [those written in the book of life]! May my dead bodies rise! [Rev 20:4]{:4} {45:}Awake and rejoice, you [chosen and holy ones] who dwell in the dust! [...] Go, my people, enter your dwellings [Heb. “cheder”] and shut your door behind you [Mt 25:6-10; Lk 13:25]{:45}; {45:}hide for a little while, until the wrath is past!{:4} [Mt 25:12; 7:23; Lk 13:27; Ps 5:5-6] {3:}For, behold, the Lord comes out of His Dwelling{:3} {4:}to punish the iniquities of the inhabitants of the Earth, and the earth will be covered with blood and will no longer bury the slain. In that day [from the midst of those two specific cherubim, and surrounded by the Heavenly hosts – Rev 19:11-18] the Lord will strike with His sharp, great and strong sword [...] the fleeing Serpent [Rev 19:19-21]{:4} [...]. {5:}In that day you will sing a song [in Zion, the Lord’s Tent] over the choicest vineyard [Israel]{:5}.” (Isa 26:15-16,19-21; 27:1-2)

About this {0:}City of Zion (Eden){:0} “hidden” at the Flood, all the patriarchs knew, and its walls were imprinted in the DNA of Jacob’s sons, this Fountain of life that flowed through the veins of the children of Israel was the Rock that gave power to each of the chosen and holy, because each of them looked ahead, defying the present, to the day when they will forever walk again together with Adam, together with Job, together with Abraham, together with David, together with the Branch on the gates of a rediscovered Paradise. This is one of the reasons why none of those born of Abraham ever believed that at death the “soul” goes to “Paradise”; they knew that Paradise will be the City of the Lord, on the holy Mountain... here, on this Earth. This is why before his death, Joseph asked that when they go Home, the children of Israel take his bones with them, not for veneration, no, but with a view to resurrection, being in the same thought with Job and with all the prophets: “But I know that my Redeemer lives and that {34:}He will rise [Heb. “quwm”: to rise, to stand up, to be installed, to stand for, to settle] at the end [the beginning of the millennium] to the Earth.{:34} Even if my skin will be destroyed and even if I will no longer have flesh [in the grave], {4:}I will surely see God [at the resurrection], I will see Him and He will be gracious to me{:4}; my eyes [in the body, but not in the “spirit”] will see Him, and not of another [not reincarnated into something else]. My soul yearns for this in me.” (Job 19:25-27)

The same thought, the same hope, the same longing for the eternal Zion (Eden) was the Life that manifested itself in every child of God, looking towards that “bright tomorrow” towards that “new day that will arise” for God’s people. In this hope filled with faith, all looked smilingly towards death “without having received [“at death”] the things promised, but only saw them [with the eyes of their hearts] and embraced them from afar [in this life], confessing that they are strangers and travelers [now] on Earth. Those who think in this way show evidently that they are seeking a Homeland. [...] For they were looking for a better Homeland, that is, a Homeland with its origin in Heaven. Therefore, God is not ashamed to be called their God, {457:}for He has prepared [at the end] a City [eternal] for them{:457}.” “By faith [Abraham] came and settled in the Promised Land as in a land that was not his own, and lived in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob, who were co-heirs with him of the same promise. For he was waiting [on Earth] for the City which has firm foundations, [the City of Zion] whose Maker and Builder is God.” (Heb 11:13-14,16,9-10)

“Therefore {357:}I will sanctify My great Name [...]. For I will raise you up from among the nations, and will bring you again to your own Land [...]. You will live in the Land I gave to your fathers; you will be My people, and I will be your God. [...] I will make the fruit of the trees great, and the grass of the field abundant [...], I will populate My City [“yashab” (to populate) + “eth” (that specific) + “iyr” (city)], I will restore it like from nothingness [“banah” (to model, to remake, to establish, to give shape) + “chorbah” (desolation, ruin, dispersion)]! [...] Then it will be said: ‘This once-abandoned Place is the Garden of Eden!’ [...]. And the nations that remain around you will know that I, the Lord, have restored what was abandoned and have planted again [“nata” (to fix in the Earth)] what was once forsaken [“shamem” (terrified, devastated, horrified); figurative meaning: “shocked” by the fall of Adam].” “Likewise, the Lord has mercy on Zion and comforts her in her desolation [“chorbah”: “failure”, devastation, disintegration]. He makes her abandoned Place a new Eden for man; and her forsaken greenness He makes a Garden of the Lord. Joy and gladness will be in its midst; thanksgiving and songs of praise.” “Throne of Glory, lifted up from the beginning, Place of our Holy Place” “I will restore your judges as at the beginning [Eden] and your counselors as at first [Adam and Eve] , because you will be called City of Righteousness, Faithful City. Zion [Jerusalem] will be saved {4:}by judgment{:4}, and those who return to the Lord will be saved through righteousness{:357}. {46:}But destruction will come to all the rebellious and sinful{:46}.” (Eze 36:23-36; Isa 51:3; Jer 17:12-13; Isa 1:26-28)

Following what has been read, at least one question naturally arises: if things are as seen above, why did the Son of man when He referred to the coming Kingdom He called it “the Kingdom of Heaven”; but not “the Kingdom of Sion” nor “the Kingdom of Eden”, nor “The Kingdom of Israel”?

The answer is very simple: although He called it nothing other than “the Kingdom of Heaven”, He nevertheless referred to this Kingdom as being “the Kingdom of Israel” and “the Kingdom of Eden”; it is true that not directly, but He referred to it with the words: “But I say to you that many [Rev 7:9-12] will come from the east and the west and will sit {57:}at the table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven{:57}; and {3:}the sons of the kingdom{:3} {4:}[the lost ones] will be thrown into the outer darkness{:4}, {6:}where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth{:6}.” “{6:}There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth when [from outside] you see{:6} {456:}Abraham, Isaac and Jacob [after the resurrection and the gathering of the chosen ones] and all the prophets [Rev 7:4-8; Rev 20:4-6] in the Kingdom of God{:456}. {3:}They will come [Rev 7:9-12] from the east and the west, from the north and the south{:3} {357:}and will sit at the table in the Kingdom of God{:357}.” “{3:}Then [at the beginning of the millennium] the righteous will shine like the Sun [and like Adam] in their Father’s Kingdom.{:3} {4:}Then the Son of man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his Kingdom [on Earth] all things that cause sin and those who do evil{:4} {6:}and [at the end of the millennium] they will throw them into the fiery furnace; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth{:6}.” “Then the king will say to [the good ones] [...]: ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, {357:}inherit the Kingdom prepared for you{:357} {0:}from the foundation of the World [from Adam]{:0}!’ [...] Then he will say to [the wicked] [...]: {4:}‘Depart from me, you accursed{:4}, {6:}into the eternal fire, prepared for the Devil and his fallen ex-angels! [...] And these will go to eternal [definitive] punishment{:6}, {57:}but the righteous will go to eternal life{:57}.’” “Hosanna! Blessed is {3:}the one who comes in the Name of the Lord{:3}. Blessed is {357:}the coming Kingdom, the Kingdom of our father David!{:357} Hosanna in the highest Heavens!” “He [he] will reign over {357:}the house of Jacob forever, and His [his] Kingdom will have no end{:357}.” “You [the twelve Jews] are those who have stood by Me constantly in My trials. Therefore {23:}I prepare the Kingdom for you{:23}, as the Father has prepared it for Me, {357:}that you may eat and drink [in the body, clear!] at My table{:357} in My Kingdom, and {57:}sit on thrones{:57} [Rev 20:4-6], {5:}to judge the twelve tribes of Israel{:5}.” (Mt 8:11-12; Lk 13:28-29; Mt 13:43,41-42; 25:34,41,46; Mk 11:9-10; Lk 1:33)

Let’s stop for a moment... all the above statements are related either to Eden: “the Kingdom prepared for you since the foundation of the world”; or to Israel: “Abraham, with Isaac and Jacob”, “the sons of the Kingdom”, “the Kingdom of our father David”, “will reign over the house of Jacob”, “to judge the twelve tribes of Israel”; and about the {357:}heirs of the Kingdom{:357} it is said that “the righteous will shine like the Sun”, which are exactly the words of Daniel: “At that time, {34:}the great Ruler [Overcomer] Michael [Heb. “He-Who-Is Elohim”] will arise [Rev 6:1-2; Dan 7:13-14]{:34}, {35:}the protector of the children of your people [Israel]{:35}; [...] and at that time, {3:}your people will be saved{:3}, namely {34:}everyone who is found written in the book{:34} [“the book of life of the Lamb who was slain {0:}from the foundation of the World{:0}”, that is, in Eden]. [...] Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the Heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness will shine like the stars forever and ever.” “Until {34:}the Ancient of Days came [the Man with many days, on Throne to reign] and brought justice to the holy ones of the Most High{:34}, and the time came when {3:}the holy ones have taken possession of the Kingdom{:3}.” “But {3:}the holy ones of the Most High will receive the Kingdom{:3} and will possess the kingdom forever, from eternity to eternity.” “{4:}Then the judgment will come{:4} [...] But {23:}the dominion, the rule, and the greatness of the kingdoms{:23} that are under the whole heaven {3:}will be given to the people of the holy ones of the Most High{:3}. His Kingdom is {357:}an everlasting Kingdom, and all dominions will serve and obey him{:357}!” (Dan 12:1-4; 7:22; 7:18; 7:26-27)

Another question arises: what is the connection between {0:}“the Kingdom of Eden” (i.e., the City of Paradise){:0}, and {34:}“the chosen people, found holy in the Day-of-Judgment, the children of Israel{:34}? That is to say, throughout Scripture, an unbreakable connection is seen between “in the beginning” and “in the end”, between what was in Eden and what will be in the end and eternally. What connection does Abraham (and his descendants) have with the two (Adam and Eve) who left the City of Zion (Eden) empty by their expulsion, cast out more by the Serpent than by God. Yes, God drove them out, but the Serpent was to blame. Why? Because if from the guardian cherub Lucifer had not chosen to become a Serpent (ex-cherub materialized in Eden in the form of a serpent); if “the father of lies”, “the murderer from the beginning”, “the thief who came to plunder” had not deceived man in Eden, today Adam and Eve would still be on their throne, and {0:}the City of the Garden{:0} would still be the first and only wonder of the world: “beautiful Height”, “the joy of the whole Earth”, “High Mountain”, “City built by God to last forever”, “the Building of perfect beauty”, “Throne of Glory full of glory”; “The City of God” on Earth.

The answer to the above question can be found in the answer to the question: “What did Eden represent for the Earth and what functions (job responsibilities) did Adam and Eve have in Eden?” The answer, in the first instance, is found in a parable told by the Son of man (Adam), and, implicitly, the Son of God (Adam being the son of God), a parable about “The Kingdom of Heaven”: “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a treasure hidden in a field. When a man finds it, he hides it, and then in his joy goes and sells all he has and buys that field.” For “how can anyone enter a strong man’s house [which was plundered and stolen from him] and carry off his possessions [to get his stolen wealth back] unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can plunder his house [recovering his kidnapped children].” “Can plunder be taken from a strong man? Can the captive of a tyrant escape? Yes – says the Lord – {34:}the plunder of the strong will be taken and the captive of the oppressor will escape,{:34} {4:}for I will contend with your enemies{:4} {34:}and I will save your children{:34}. {4:}I will make your oppressors eat their own flesh, and they will be drunk with their own blood{:4}. And all flesh will know {346:}that I am the Lord, your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob{:346}.” (Mt 13:44; 12:29; Isa 49:24-26)

There is obviously a reason why the “coming Kingdom” was called “Kingdom of Heaven”, although this Kingdom both at the beginning and at the end (eternal) was and will be not in Heaven, but on Earth; and the reason is found exactly in what Eden was in the beginning, and exactly in the purpose for which Israel was initially brought into existence from Abraham. What was Eden in the beginning? Eden was a piece (a smaller cube) of the City, the City from Heaven of God; Eden was a gift, a small piece from the Cherubim’s City; {0:}Eden had its origin in Heaven{:0}, that is, in the City of “the New-Jerusalem”, which will forever be brought down to Earth, {7:}as the Place where Heaven will eternally govern over the Universe{:7}. Eden was installed on Earth as an embassy of Heaven on Earth, and Adam and Eve were more than father and mother, king and queen, they were ambassadors of Heaven on Earth, they were ambassadors of Earth in the Universe.

The reason why Eden – the City of Zion – is called the “Kingdom of Heaven” lies precisely {0:}in the quality of embassy that Eden had on Earth{:0}. When a piece of the City of Heaven (the Place of the Throne of the Universe) is embedded in the Earth to be an embassy, that piece of City, that Eden is exactly Heaven on Earth, and the Kingdom of Eden is exactly the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth... Adam and Eve did not lose “a vegetable garden”, {0:}they lost an embassy and a Kingdom{:0}, a Kingdom that passed through deception (theft) into the hands of the Serpent (who became the new ambassador), a Kingdom whose City God had to defend with cherubim and a fiery sword, and later to hide it, for a time, when, giving everything, giving Himself to death, God redeemed the Kingdom from the Serpent who had made himself king over the Earth, or rather “a ruler”; for about the Serpent in Eden, about the ex-cherub “from the beginning” a thief, murderer and liar it is said: {4:}“A Voice came from Heaven{:4}.” {4:}When the Voice will come again from Heaven will take place “the judgment of this World […] and the ruler of this World will be [bound and] cast out{:4}.” “{3:}Then the King said to His servants{:3}: ‘{4:}Bind him hand and foot, and take him away and throw him into the outer darkness{:4}; {6:}there will be weeping [of the heart] and gnashing of teeth [of the body]{:6}.’” “But this rebellious servant {4:}throw him into the outer darkness{:4}; {6:}there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth{:6}.” “{4:}Depart from Me, you cursed ones{:4}, {6:}into the eternal fire, which was prepared for the Devil and his ex-angels [demons]{:6}!” (Jn 12:28,31; Mt 22:13; 25:30,41)

At the Flood, when the Heavens and the Earth were shaken, God hid the City of Eden from the Earth and its inhabitants, because the Earth had become the battleground between good and evil, between God’s servants and Satan who had become their enemy; because this was the consequence of man’s fall into sin: “Serpent [...] because you have done this, you’ve become a curse [for Earth]... for all your remaining days, you will crawl on the Earth and eat [deplete] it. Enmity will be between you and the woman, between your seed [the weeds] and her seed [My wheat]. This [stabbed rib] {4:}will crush your head [at the end]{:4}, and you {12:}[at every step] will bruise their heels{:12}.” “The Lord [in the Council of Heaven] said to Satan: ‘Where do you come from?’ And Satan [the new ambassador (“sun of God”) in Heaven] answered: ‘From my travels on my Earth and from the walks I've taken on it.’”... “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a man who sowed good seed [Gen 1:31] in his field. But while men were sleeping, his enemy [the Serpent] came, sowed weeds, and left. When the wheat stalks sprouted [Abel, Enoch, Noah, Nahor, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob; Israel], and produced fruit [a chosen people], the weeds emerged [Cain, Lamech, Ham, Nimrod; Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome]. [...] Let them grow together {34:}until the harvest; and at the time of the harvest{:34} I will tell the reapers: {4:}‘First, gather the weeds and bind them in bundles{:4}; {6:}to burn them{:6}; and {57:}gather the wheat [the sons of the Kingdom] into my barn [on Earth]{:57}!’” (Gen 3:14-15; Job 1:7; Mt 13:24-26,30)

From the above, it follows that the people of Israel were brought into existence from Abraham as a continuation of the role that Adam and Eve had in Eden, a continuation in an adapted form of the mission to be ambassadors of Heaven and of the Kingdom of God on Earth, a mission that was highlighted from the very beginnings of this people: “Israel is My son [like Adam], My firstborn.” “You will be Mine out of all peoples, for all the Earth is Mine; you will be to Me a Kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” “For you are a holy people to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the Earth.” “For you have chosen them out of all the other peoples of the Earth to make them Your inheritance.”... for what purpose? “Behold, I have taught you Laws and commandments [...]. Keep and fulfill them, for this will be your wisdom and understanding before the peoples.” “And today the Lord has testified to you that you will be His people [...] and He will give you precedence in glory, fame, and majesty over all the nations He has made, and you will be a holy people to the Lord your God, as He promised you.” “Listen to Me, My people; pay attention to Me, My nation. {3:}For a law will come from Me, and I will make My law a light to the peoples{:3} [...] {46:}The heavens will vanish like smoke, the Earth will wear out like a garment, and its inhabitants will die like flies{:46}, {357:}but My salvation [in Zion] will last forever, and My righteousness will never end{:357}.”… So it’s no wonder why the Serpent’s enmity from Eden, throughout the centuries, {12:}has turned into a poison that has gripped all nations in various forms of antisemitism{:12}... until one day, {34:}the Day when Father will snatch his son{:34} from the arms of the poisoned ones; {4:}the Day when the tares will be bound in bundles and thrown into darkness{:4}! (Exo 4:22; 19:5-6; Deu 7:6; 2Ki 8:53; Deu 4:5-6; Isa 51:4,6)

In a way that only love can explain, through God’s love for His people, when the Scriptures speak of Israel at the same time they speak of the City of Zion, of the Throne, of the Holy Mountain, of the Promised Land; it’s something you can’t separate. When God says ”My people”, in the same breath He also says “My Throne”, and “My Land”, and “Paradise”, and “My Zion”, and “My Mountain”, and “Tent”, and “Jerusalem”... and “eternity”; for Him, they are just other colors of the same rainbow.

“Don’t you know? Haven’t you heard? Hasn’t it been told to you from the beginning [from Eden]? [...] {34:}He resides [comes (riding) from] beyond the high borders [of sky] of the Earth{:34}, and {4:}its inhabitants are not even like grasshoppers before Him{:4}; {3:}He stretches out the Heavens like dust in the waters, and spreads them out like a Tent, to populate it.{:3} {4:}He turns princes into nothing and makes the judges of the Earth as nothing. [...] He blows upon them and they dry up [Zec 14:12] and a whirlwind takes them away like straw [Isa 17:13; 29:5]{:4}. [...] {3:}Don’t you know [Jacob]{:3}? Haven’t you heard [Israel]? The eternal God, the Lord, made the ends of the Earth [and Eden]. He does not tire, nor does He grow weary [...]. {35:}He gives strength to the weary and increases the power of the faint. [...] Those who trust in the Lord renew their strength; they soar like eagles [towards the City of Holy Mountain]{:35}.” “Who has done and performed these things? He who {0:}has determined the course of history [for the sake of Zion] from the beginning [from Eden]{:0}, I, the Lord, the first [Eden] and the same until the last ages [Zion]. {4:}The islands see this and are afraid, the ends of the Earth tremble [...] Behold, all who are angry with you will be ashamed and disgraced; {6:}they will be destroyed{:6} and all who oppose you will perish{:4}. [...] {3:}For I am the Lord your God, who takes you by the right hand and says to you: ‘Do not fear, I will help you!{:3}’” “Who declared this {0:}from the beginning [of the World]{:0}, so that we might know it, and long ago, so that we might say, ‘He is right’? {12:}No one [among the nations] has declared it, no one has prophesied it, and no one has heard your [hope] words{:12}. I, the First One [even from Eden], said to Zion: {03:}‘Behold [Adam], behold [Eve]!’{:03} and to Jerusalem: {3:}‘I send you a messenger of good news!’{:3} [...] {24:}Behold, they are all [the prophets of the nations] nothing, their works are vain, their idols are a breath of emptiness [without life]{:24}!” “I have declared {0:}the end from the beginning [from Eden]{:0}, and from ancient times things which are not yet done. I say, {3:}‘My statements shall stand{:3} and {4:}I will fulfill all My will{:4}.’ {3:}I call from the east [sunrise] a bird of prey [the Prince],{:3} from a far country, {3:}a man to fulfill My purpose{:3}. [...] Listen to Me, you stubborn of heart [you antisemites], who are far from righteousness! [...] {357:}I will put My salvation in Zion, and My glory over Israel{:357}!” (Isa 40:21-24,28-31; 41:4-5,13; 41:26-27,29; 46:10-13)

“Awake, awake! {3:}Be clothed in Your Glory, Zion{:3}! Be clothed in your festive garments, {357:}Jerusalem, the holy City{:357}! For there shall no more come into you the uncircumcised and the unclean.” “Send out Your light and Your faithfulness; let them lead me and bring me to {357:}Your holy Mountain and to Your dwelling places{:357}!” “{57:}How lovely are your dwelling places, Lord of Hosts!{:57} My soul {3:}yearns and longs for the courts [gardens] of the Lord{:3} [...] Ah, your altars, Lord of Hosts, my King and my God! {357:}Blessed are those who will dwell in Your House{:357} [...]! For {57:}a day in Your courts{:57} is better than a millennium elsewhere; I would rather {57:}be at the threshold of the House of my God{:57} [...] For the Lord is a sun and a shield; {357:}the Lord bestows grace and glory [for eternity]{:357}.” “I will give them {57:}in My House and within My walls a dwelling place{:57} [...] I will give them an everlasting name, which shall not be cut off. [...] {357:}I will bring them to My holy Mountain and fill them with joy in My House{:357}.” “God arises [ascends], {4:}His enemies are scattered, and those who hate Him flee before His face. Like smoke vanishes, so do You scatter them{:4}; {6:}as wax melts before the fire, so the wicked perish before God{:6}. {357:}But the righteous rejoice, they exult before God and overflow with joy{:357}.” (Isa 52:1; Ps 43:3; 84:1-4,10-11; Isa 56:5,7; Ps 68:1-3)

“For on My holy Mountain, on the High-Mountain of Israel – declares the Lord God – there {357:}the whole house [all the tribes] of Israel will serve Me{:357}, all of them in the Land; there {357:}I will accept them with favor [‘Come, you who are blessed!’]{:357} and I will be pleased with your offerings and with the first-fruits of your gifts, everything you dedicate. {357:}I will accept you as a pleasing fragrance{:357} {3:}after I bring you out from the peoples and gather you from the lands where you have been scattered{:3}; {3:}and I will be sanctified through you in the sight of the nations [as ambassadors of holiness]{:3}. Then you will know that I am the Lord when {3:}I bring you back to the Land of Israel, to the Land that I swore with uplifted hand to give to your fathers{:3}.” “{6:}Because the wicked will be exterminated [Heb. “karath”: to cut, to destroy, consume (definitely/eternally)]{:6}, {357:}but those who hope in the Lord will inherit the Land{:357}. In a little while, {46:}the wicked will be no more; though you look for them, they will not be found{:46}. {357:}The meek will inherit the Land and enjoy abundant peace. [...] For those blessed by the Lord will inherit the Land{:357}, {4:}but those cursed by Him{:4} {6:}will be exterminated{:6}. [...] {357:}The righteous will inherit the land and dwell in it forever{:357}.” (Eze 20:40-42; Ps 37:9-11,22,29)

God has put the nations to the test, apparently He has abandoned his people (the chosen son among the nations), and the nations have believed themselves justified in trampling underfoot a people who have done them no wrong, except for an inheritance received in Eden, that of being light and a channel of blessing... and it was, and is, and will be eternal {3:}for the Lord (Father) at the end of history will show once again that He, out of His good pleasure, has chosen Israel{:3}... but woe to the nations who will be found in enmity towards the chosen ones {456:}on the Day when God will rise up on His Throne to be a Lion that leaps into battle for Israel (Zion){:456}!

“{4:}Let the nations dare to come{:4} in the plain of the Great-Judge, for {4:}there I will be [coming (on horseback)] to judge all the nations that have come to the siege{:4}. {34:}Put [angels] your hand to the sickle{:34} [Rev 16:1-21], {4:}for the harvest [of the weeds] is ripe! Come and tread the grapes with your feet, for the winepresses are full and the vats are overflowing with the wickedness of these people.{:4} [...] {4:}Suddenly, the sun and moon grow dark; the stars lose their brightness{:4} {34:}for the Lord roars from Zion, and His Voice thunders from Jerusalem{:34} {4:}and the heavens tremble and the Earth quakes{:4}. {35:}But the Lord is the refuge of His people and the protection of the children of Israel. And you shall see Me thus, as the One-who-Is the Lord your God, who dwells in Zion, My holy Mountain. Then Jerusalem will be holy{:35} and strangers shall never pass through it again. {57:}In that day the mountains will drip with sweet wine, and the hills will flow with milk; water will course through the valleys of Judah, and a fountain of waters from the House of the Lord will rise up, refreshing all the east [sunrise]. [...] Judah will be inhabited [for millennia and] forever, and Jerusalem, generation after generation [...] and the Lord in Zion will have His Dwelling place eternally{:57}.” (Joe 3:12-13,15-18,20-21)

„But as for you who forsake the Lord, who forget My holy Mountain [supporting the aberration that at death you go to “Heaven/Zion”], who eat with the Usurper* and drink the covenant with the Divider** {4:}I dedicate you to the sword, and all of you will bow your knee to be slaughtered{:4} [Isa 28:15-21] […] {35:}Behold, My servants shall eat{:35}, {46:}but to you, food will be lacking{:46}; {35:}behold, My servants shall drink{:35}, {46:}but to you, drink will be lacking{:46} [Lk 16:24]; {35:}behold, My servants shall rejoice{:35}, {46:}but you shall be chained***{:46}; {35:}Behold, My servants will sing for joy, because their hearts will be glad{:35}, {46:}but you will wail from the pain that will feed and flood your heart, you will mourn the disintegration felt in your soul{:46}. {6:}Then your accursed name will represent ‘The one who perished!’{:6}, while {57:}the Lord God will give His servants another name{:57}. Then anyone who blesses in the Land will bless in the God of truth, and whoever swears in the Land will swear by the God of truth, {6:}for the former troubles [even the wicked and liars] will be forgotten, they will be dissipated before Me{:6}. {7:}For behold, I create new Heavens and a new Earth{:7}, and {1246:}the former things{:1246} shall not be remembered nor come into mind. {7:}But be glad and rejoice forever in what I create{:7}. For {7:}I will make Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy. I will rejoice in Jerusalem and delight in My people{:7}; {67:}no more shall the voice of weeping be heard, nor the voice of crying [of those destroyed for eternity]{:67}. {7:}They will build houses [evident for the body] and live in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruit [evident in the body].{:7} [...] {7:}My chosen ones will enjoy the work of their hands. [...] They will establish a blessed seed, and their children [and their children’s children] will be with them [Gen 1:27-28]. [...] The wolf and the lamb will graze together. The lion will eat straw like the ox, and the serpent will eat dust. No evil, no harm will be done on all My holy Mountain [in Paradise]{:7}!” (Isa 65:11-25)

So... when the Scriptures say that the righteous (the holy ones) declared by God “have not yet arrived” Home, when Daniel was told “Go your way till the end; you will rest and rise again [resurrected] in your allotted inheritance [Eze 48:1-8,23-27;29] at the end of the days” (Dan 12:13); when those alive in the last generation are told that they “will not precede [in Paradise] those who are asleep [and vice versa!]”; when Job says that “at the end” (Job 19:25) the Redeemer “will arise” and, he says, “my eyes will see Him”, being called to life from the tomb; when John says of the righteous that at the end “they came back to life and reigned” (Rev 20:4)... don’t you think it is a nerve, a shamelessness, an odious arrogance, a demonic lie to say that you, at the moment of death (or “rapture”?!), in “spirit” (an invention of “Rome”), will arrive Home in an instant, in Paradise?

And if Abraham, the father of the faithful, has not yet risen and entered the Kingdom (Heb 11:13), to whose bosom do you go “in spirit” at death? Isn’t it to the father, the spirit materialized in Eden as the Serpent, who deceived you, the “murderer from the beginning”, for whom a fire is prepared “at the end”?

There are numerous signs along the route to the lake-of-fire (“hell”) that read, “Straight to Heaven!”

Lying is fatal… the fruit of the lake-of-fire!

The days of Sukkot; a Day of vengeance!

Indeed, the last day of Sukkot this year is one of the darkest days in the history of the chosen people, from the time of Abraham’s calling to the present day. A day marked by the animalistic and demonic brutality of Israel’s enemies, a day that takes me back to the capture of Lot by the barbarians of the lowland settlements, but also to the vengeance of the One-who-Is by the sword of Abraham.

Israel’s enemies have this time made the mistake of all time, bringing upon them a vengeance that has been waiting for ages, a rage gathered throughout the long bloody history of this chosen people.

This attack on a Sukkot day and on a Sabbath day has filled the cup of an anger that will pour out upon all who have, who have had, and will have a sword stretched out to Jerusalem. And the fact that these madmen have attacked the chosen ones at the very beginning of the Jubilee, which was supposed to be a year of rejoicing... they have attacked the chosen ones on a day of Sukkot, which was supposed to be a day of rejoicing... these madmen have made an attempt against the very One-who-Is, the One who instituted these feasts in His eternal Covenant with the people whom the Love has chosen... it is serious!... more grievous than it has ever been before!... why?... because of the Jubilee!... because of the time set in the Universe to be a day of vengeance!

One of Islam’s greatest mistakes, since its very beginning, has been its departure from the true Scriptures, where the One-who-Is has clearly expressed the choice He has made regarding Israel, but has also stipulated the consequences that will follow if anyone dares to touch even a hair of one of His chosen.

There is a special prophecy about Sukkot, on that Day, on “that great and dreadful day” ... on the very Jubilee.

“In that day, those of the nations who will rise up against Jerusalem in the year of years (Jubilee), before the king (prince) and the One-who-Is, at the times of Sukkot... upon those of the families of the earth who will not keep count of Sukkot to worship the King, the One-who-Is, the rain (Jubilee blessing) will not fall on them... they shall be smitten with the plague, the plague with which the One-who-Is shall smite the nations that profane the Sukkot.” “This is the plague with which the One-who-Is will strike all the peoples who fight against Jerusalem: it will dry up their flesh while they are still standing, it will dry up their eyes in their holes, and it will dry up their tongues in their mouths.”

There is something special about Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles) on the Jubilee. Because both the feast and the whole year have to do with rejoicing, redemption, and settling into the promised rest, on the Jubilee occasion, Sukkot becomes a celebration that spans the entire Jubilee year. In other words, the Jubilee opens a year-long Sukkot. The two events become one. That is why this year’s Sukkot is special, and all the more grievous is the madness of the enemies with swords pointed against Jerusalem (Israel) on this special occasion... this time the punishment will be applied: the One-who-Is “will dry their flesh while they are still standing, dry their eyes in their holes, and dry their tongues in their mouths”.

The situation is even worse because this time, beginning with the Jubilee, Israel has a king, the king of whom it has been said, “I see him, but not now; I look at him, but not from near. A star rises from Jacob, a prince rises from Israel. He shall pierce through the rulers of Moab and subdue all the children of Seth; he shall overcome Edom; he shall conquer the opposing Seir... Israel is raised up!”

What my eyes have seen with this invasion of beings without humanity, I have never seen in my life! To take children, women, old men, and defenseless people motivated by unjustified hatred... to take them with such brutality, and to behave worse than in the jungle... it's unthinkable!... something that cannot be justified at all! Something whose only suitable counteraction is the very punishment chosen by the One-who-Is: “He will dry their flesh while they are still standing, dry their eyes in their holes and dry their tongues in their mouths” ... without water (rain)!

I saw in that woman dragged like an animal from the trunk outside, held by the hair, covered in blood, tied with her hands behind her back, I saw the “daughter of Zion” dragged and treated with all the vileness throughout the centuries, trampled on with brutality by the nations... but I have bad news for all those involved in such barbarisms: the day of vengeance has come!... a trap has been set for the nations and they have fallen in droves... the Jubilee has come: a year of reward for Israel, a Day of vengeance!

“Behold, what the One-who-Is proclaims to the ends of the earth: say to the daughter of Zion, ‘Behold, your Deliverer is coming; behold, the payment is with Him, and the reward goes before Him.’”

“Draw near, you nations, and hear! Hearken, you peoples!... For the One-who-Is himself is angry with all the nations and full of wrath with all their host... For My sword... shall come down upon Edom, upon the people whom I have condemned to extinction, to judge them... For it is a day of vengeance from the One-who-Is, a year of recompense and vengeance for Zion.”

“Then shall they tremble with fear without any cause of fright; the One-who-Is shall scatter the dry bones of them that rise up against you, shall put them to shame, for the One-who-Is has cast them off...

O!... Behold, he who will bring forth the deliverance of Israel from Zion!

On that day, when He-who-is will bring back the captives of war to His people, Jacob will rejoice, and Israel will be joyful” ... why?... thanks to the Jubilee!

When you look at what is happening in the The-Most-Beautiful-Land it is impossible to not be shocked by the atrocities that happened there with a hatred and violence that seems to have been imported from the Middle Ages: women raped, babies decapitated, husbands with their wives and children burned alive... only the bonfire was missing!

Any human being with the mental faculties still intact is rightly asking “how such a thing is possible?” ... how?! ... how from the mind of a beings endowed (normally) with a conscience can arise the thought of such actions that have no place in a humanity truly understood? There are some laws of humanity, and if there is no place in “loving your enemies”, there should be a place in “don’t do to others what you dislike”... so I define the elementary rule of humanity, although it would be preferable to “love your neighbor as yourself”... it is the first social law that came through Moses, as it was later called, among the disciples, “the first commandment”... at the level of inter-human relations.

Many find the blame for what has happened in the very agitated and disunited state of those who by definition as a nation should have been watchful… and end up pointing the finger at the tense political situation and bad national security management. At first glance this would seem to be the case, in essence this time things have a much deeper substratum because essentially the main Watcher over Jerusalem and the The-Most-Beautiful-Land is the One-who-Is. Did He not say that “he who touches you touches the light of My eyes”?

Where was He who “neither slumbers nor sleeps, who watches over Israel”? The answer is: He was there!... He was a silent Witness!... He was the One who wept!... and is the One who will rise as the Avenger!

Those who touched Israel this time made the mistake of their existence!... the hour of their judgment has come, and in the language of the Quran I tell them that the Hell shall be poured upon them… and I do not speak about the troops of soldiers prepared for an invasion... no!... for that would largely mean the death of both, the guilty and the not guilty: women, children, old and powerless.

This time, a prophecy has been fulfilled that shows us exactly where we are in the firmament of history and tells us who is the moral author of the atrocity that has taken place, but also how the vengeance will be wrought, and who will do it... the prophet says: “But some news... will terrify him, and then he will proceed with great anger to destroy and slaughter many with atrocities. He will spread his tents (camp) of his palace between the sea and the holy and glorious mountain. But he will meet his end, and no one will come to his help.”

It is shocking how this prophecy was fulfilled right at the beginning of the Jubilee, on a Sabbath day and a Sukkot day! It is shocking how the camp between the Mediterranean and Mount Zion rushed like a tsunami into The-Most-Beautiful-Land, destroying with such ferocity its inhabitants who were living peacefully in their own land, in their own home, in their own bed and in the rest commanded by the One-who-Is Himself.

The greatest shock is not the barbarian acts with which this prophecy has been fulfilled, the real shock is that this prophecy reveals who the moral author of this act of genocide is. At first glance it would be Islam, more precisely the extremist groups born out of the Quran... but NO!... shockingly, the moral author of this cataclysm against humanity is actually the Papal Institution. How? It is very easy to identify in the prophecy that the “emperor of the north” is the “little horn”, it is even the Papacy.

The legitimate question is: how can the Papal Institution be linked to Islam and Hamas? And for this we have to take a brief trip back in history, even in the Middle Ages, to analyze the circumstances in which Islam was born.

In short, at that time the Pope had two problems in The-Most-Beautiful-Land. The first was Christianity (the authentic one!) with major influences in Asia and especially in Jerusalem; the second problem of the Papacy was that it wanted since the conquest of “Rome” to place its seat in Jerusalem. To do this it needed a puppy to conquer for itself the Jerusalem, but once the puppy found itself with a bone in its mouth, it no longer obeyed its master. Apparently, the master sent his armies to kneel down Islam and capture Jerusalem, in reality it was a battle against witnesses and any documents that could testify the truth about Islam’s birth certificate. Every witness and document have been burned. Two hundred years are missing from the testimony of history and all we have today about the beginnings of Islam we have from stories that were not witnessed at the birth. The real testimonies (documents) are under seal, hidden in the vault of the Vatican library. The “spiritual” leaders of both sides know the truth about the origins of Islam. Even occult societies know that Islam was commanded into existence by the Papacy.

A close look at the two religions, the (Papal) “Christianity” and the Islam, we will find that they have essentially the same doctrine, the differences coming only from the traditional background on which the two religions evolved, the first evolving on the pagan and polytheistic background of Rome (Europe), the second evolving on the monotheistic background of the tribes with origin in Abraham. While “Christianity” grew up eating anything and somewhat polytheistic with worship of statues and paintings, Islam grew up differently, not eating anything and somewhat monotheistic and without worship of statues and paintings. But we need to look much deeper.

Among the first interests that the “angel” ;-) seems to have had when he “dictated” the Quranic writings were the “Virgin Mary” (even her mother) and the authority of the Church over the unbelievers. I bring in special attention the “authority of the Church” which is found in the following words: “I will set your followers [apparently Jesus’ disciples] over those who do not believe until the day of resurrection” (3:55). In other words, the “angel” says that over the Muslim world (of believers) Islam was to be the authority, while over the world of non-believers (in Islam) “those who followed” Jesus were to have the authority … of course not the (dead) disciples, but the one who sat on “Peter’s seat” (Caesar!) ... the Pope.

In order to demonstrate that “Christianity” and Islam are essentially one and the same, meaning the same coin but with different faces, it is sufficient to examine just one of the doctrines, the most important one, namely how these two religions view redemption (salvation). It is shocking how, on this subject, the Quran overlaps like a custom-made glove on the right hand of “Christian” (Papal) theology. In short, Islam believes and claims the following: we live in the body until death, after which there will be a resurrection and a judgment; those who have done works suitable for Heaven will go to Heaven, those who have not, will be (bound with chains and) cast into a Hell that will burn for eternity. It is the same theology that “Christianity” had at the time when the Quran was written. They are identical!... the difference comes only from the pagan background on which “Christianity” evolved, a background that believed in the “immortality of the soul” ... somehow in “Christianity”, at death the soul goes to Hell or Heaven (depending on the works), then is resurrected at the resurrection, judged, and sent (again) for eternity to Heaven or Hell. Essentially it is the same doctrine... a false doctrine! The Scriptures do NOT support such a thing!

Some might say that there is a major difference in the way that the two religions look at Jesus. At a superficial look you might be considered insane to not agree.... and yet... let’s look deeper. Both religions are fierceness about what happened at the occasion of Yeshua's sacrifice. If for “Christians” the sacrifice of Jesus has no redeeming value, from the point of view of the Quran Jesus did not even die, rather it was an illusion, a deception.

The real problem of “Christianity” is the way in which it has transformed the Son of God into something that He is not, furthermore it undressed and robbed Him of all the attributes of HaMashiach: Priest, King, Prophet.

Despite the fact that the Christianity (Epistles) say that there is one Mediator (Priest) between divinity and man, the Pope declared himself a priest and established an illegitimate priesthood – illegitimate in relation to the One-who-Is –, not being from the tribe of Levi. Despite the fact that the Christianity (Epistles) say there is one Lord in Heaven and on Earth, the Pope by himself has enthroned on the supposed throne of Peter, with no right to kingship in relation to the One-who-Is, Peter not being of the tribe of Judah... moreover the Christianity (Epistles) say there is one Head over the body of the Church, and the Head in question is not the Pope! And lastly, despite the fact that Yeshua (HaMashiach) came to be a Prophet and to fulfill the prophecies of Scripture, the Papacy from its beginnings had a problem with these prophecies and even with the Scriptures themselves. All of its efforts throughout history have been directed against the Scriptures with much the same zeal with which it wanted the Jerusalem. At the beginning the Papacy kept the Scriptures under lock and key, then altered them, then preached them in a language foreign to the crowd, then developed all sorts of doctrines, each more satanic and pagan. In other words, “Christianity” does not view Yeshua (HaMashiach) any better than Islam does.

The Papacy has been keen to promote “the Virgin” because its interests have been more mystical and occult. The true origins of “Christianity” and Islam are to be found in the hidden (occult) religion of Nimrod... that of the Tower of Babel... a covert worship to Bal (ex-Lucifer).

The mode of worship of Muslims and “Christians” is similar in forms, and unlike Jews, they see in holy places as an image (icon, idol), a present mystical manifestation, while Jews see in them only a place where the divine once has manifested... it’s a huge difference! In other words, there is no difference between the statues (idols) and paintings (icons) of “Christianity” and the holy places of Islam; it is the same (mystical) idolatry in a transvestite form of “monotheism”, in reality it is a worship of demons, hatred and lies... “You have as your father the devil, and you want to fulfill your father’s desires. He has been a murderer from the beginning and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him.... for he is a liar and the father of every lie.”

There is no difference between the authority of priests in “Christianity” and the authority of “priests” in Islam. There is no difference between papal anti-Semitism and that of Islam; no difference between hatred of the Sabbath; no difference in the desire to conquer Jerusalem – the “City of the great king”.

Islam, in essence, has its origins in a “Christianity” standing at the opposite pole of the Scriptures... worse, the radical Islam has inherited the habits of the Papacy from the Middle Ages: murders, tortures, death to all who are otherwise, and death first of all to the Jews. Radical Islam is a present-day expression of the inquisition and crusades of the Middle Ages.

If one could trace the funding that has supported all the organizations that have risen up against Jerusalem and the Jews over the years, one would discover that many actions (even terrorist ones) have also been funded by the Vatican... the same Papacy that secretly rejoiced in the atrocities of Nazism.

Today the little man dressed in white comes out on the balcony of the “citadel of seven hills” and says, “stop the killing!” ... but he doesn’t say it from the rebuke of conscience... he says it only to cover his hands stained with the blood of innocents... for in essence the Papacy is the moral author of the atrocities committed by Hamas... indeed, because a thousand and some years ago the Pope tried to train a little donkey... a pagan’s mistake!... for if he had read the Scriptures, he would have understood that the little donkey that he imagined would enter triumphantly into Jerusalem was in fact, according to the Scriptures, a “wild donkey”: “You will name him Ishmael... He shall be like a wild donkey among men; his anger shall be against all men, and the anger of all men shall be against him.” ... and so it was!... and so we see it is today!

Returning to the prophecy that points to the Papacy being at least morally responsible for the stationing of its mercenary troops between the Mediterranean and the Holy Mountain, this prophecy not only speaks of the atrocity that has taken place, “a great anger to destroy and slaughter many with atrocities”, but also tells what the punishment for these atrocities will be, and how it will be realized: “he will meet his end, and no one will come to his help” ... this “the end” and this lack of response as “help” does not refer only to Hamas... no!... it has in regard to both Papacy and Islam!

It is obvious and clear that the Israeli armies do not have the intention – nor the ability – to achieve something like this, which is prophetically called “the fall of Babylon”. I don’t want to insist now on what “Babylon” represents in the Scriptures, instead I want to bring up something much more important, namely, how this “fall of Babylon” (of “Rome” and her first daughter, Islam) is realized.

The prophecy says: “he will meet his end, and no one will come to his help, for then the Great Prince Michael (the One who is the One-who-Is) will arise, the Protector of the children of His people... at that time His people will be saved (delivered, redeemed)”... in other words the scene introduces the Messiah, the king awaited by the Jews for ages, the one about whom it is said: “a prince rises from Israel. He shall pierce through the rulers of Moab and subdue all the children of Seth; he shall overcome Edom; he shall conquer the opposing Seir.”

The prophecy says, “He (the One-who-Is) looks down from the height of His holiness, the One-who-Is looks down from Heaven to Earth, to hear the groaning of the prisoners of war and to deliver those who are about to die; that they may proclaim in Zion the name of the One-who-Is and His praises in Jerusalem, when all nations and all kingdoms shall be gathered together to serve the One-who-Is.” ... how is this to be accomplished?

The prophecy says, “The One-who-Art, give thy judgments to the king, and give thy righteousness to the King’s son. And he will judge Your people with justice and Your wretched ones with impartiality... he will do justice to the wretched of the people... and shall crush the oppressor... in his days shall the righteous flourish and there shall be abundance of peace until the moon is no more. He shall rule from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth... all kings shall worship him, and all nations shall serve him... his name shall stand for ever, as long as the Sun holds his name. With him shall they bless one another, and all nations shall call him blessed. Blessed be the One-who-Is the Love of Israel, the only One who works miracles! Blessed be His glorious name forever, and let all the earth be filled with His glory! Amen! And again, I say: Amen!”

How?... thanks to the Jubilee, for the Day of Judgement has come!

The prophecy (in short) says that at “the middle of the week” the “sacrifice (of food) and drink” will come to an end. I don’t go into all the aspects of this prophecy about the “prince” or “Prince” and the other details which I have covered and explained in detail in “The Day of the Law”.

The prophecy about the ending of the “sacrifice (of food) and drink” was first fulfilled in the middle of the week “over the years” when in 32 AD, on the occasion of the supreme Sacrifice of Yeshua (HaMashiach) the Temple ceremonies were suspended for a period, on which occasion the “sacrifice (of food) and drink” also came to an end – obviously – on the event of the destruction of the Temple by the soldiers of the Roman Empire.

In addition to this fulfillment of prophecy, the prophecy was to be fulfilled once again on the occasion of the coming of the prince from David, that “great king of Jerusalem” who was to come as an expression of the “fall of Babylon”, on which occasion some practices of “sacrifice (of food) and drink” were to be forever abolished. These practices of claiming to be a sacrifice (gift) before the One-who-Is were related to “food” (bread) and “drink” (wine), which in “Christian” language is translated as “transubstantiation”, essentially an offensive practice to the One-who-Is and a mystical sacrifice offered to demons and to the ex-Lucifer... a practice that was to be brought to an end (extermination) forever.

“Transubstantiation” is that mystical phenomenon that takes place at the request of the priest, a special request called “eucharist”, whereby the bread and wine in the hands of the priests are mystically (occultly) transformed into the body and blood of God. In other words, God is a kind of puppy dog, who, at the priest’s command “Come here!”, interrupts all activity and executes Himself, making Himself flesh and blood in place of the bread and wine put before the priests, a kind of “abracadabra”. Putting irony aside and pointing out as seriously as possible, transubstantiation is one of the greatest mockeries ever invented by demons against the One-who-is. By this practice of “Christianity” the unique and complete sacrifice of the Lamb of the One-who-Is accomplished by His death on the “altar” at the edge of Jerusalem is totally disregarded.

The central idea of the Scriptures is that the One-who-Is loved the World (Universe) so much that He made the ultimate sacrifice through the death of Yeshua (HaMashiach), the Bread and Life (Blood) who came down from Heaven to give Himself to death in the place of the believer who returns from his wandering from death to life, to abundant life.

What was accomplished on Calvary Hill, the salvation, was accomplished once and for ever! This one and complete Sacrifice to cover the sins of all mankind was foreshadowed and prophesied from the very beginning, from the time when Adam and Eve were clothed in the garments of sacrifice, that system of sacrifice which Abel later practiced. This sacrifice of the lamb was imported into the uninterrupted sacred services at the Temple, the place where the One-who-Is taught His people the principles of salvation. In every lamb sacrificed at Temple was the promise of salvation that the One-who-Is will realize at the cross of the ages. At the same time, salvation was present day by day in the Temple through the miracle of the connection between that historical present and the moment of the Sacrifice, but this does not mean that the blood of the lamb on the altar was (mystically) the blood of the Lamb, nor that the flesh of the lamb consumed on the altar was not the flesh of the Son of God... In other words, the blasphemy called “transubstantiation” was never taught or present (found) at the Temple... a kind of travestying of the lie in truth... a kind of death for sure!

The prophecy says that with the fulfillment of this prophecy, this shamelessness and foolishness will come to an end, and this will come to concrete fruition in the “fall of Babylon”, meaning the fall of any kind of religious system with its origins in deception... why?... because the Jubilee also means deliverance from lie, as it means delivery of the people of the One-who-Is from every form of subjugation, whether physical or spiritual, through truth and justice... moreover, the Jubilee is also a day (year) of vengeance of the One who chose the Jerusalem and chose Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to live, they and their children, they and their children’s children, in the Promised Land, in the The-Most-Beautiful-Land.

“Therefore, behold, the days are coming – says the One-who-Is – when it will no longer be said: As the One-who-Is lives, who brought the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt. But it shall be said: As the One-who-Is lives, who brought the children of Israel out of the land of the north ('Babylon') and out of all the countries where he had driven them... for I will bring them back to their land, which I gave to their fathers.” “I will multiply your seed like the stars of heaven, and I will give to your descendants all this land of which I have spoken, and they shall possess it forever.” “For I will bring you out from among the nations, and gather you out of all countries, and bring you again into your own land.”

“Thus saith the One-who-Is: If I have not made my covenant with day and night, if I have not established the laws of heaven and earth, then I will also deny the seed of Jacob and of my servant David, and will not take of his seed those who shall rule over the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; for I will bring back the captives of war, and will have mercy on them.”

“You shall proclaim the liberty of the land to all its inhabitants: this shall be to you the year of rejoicing (Jubilee); everyone shall return to his own land, and each of you shall return to his own family. The fiftieth year shall be to you the year of rejoicing... and consider it holy.” “He has sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the slaves, and deliverance to the war captives; to proclaim a year of mercy of the One-who-Is, and a day of vengeance of our Love; to comfort the sorrowful, to give to the sorrowful in Zion, to give them a royal crown instead of ashes, an oil of joy instead of weeping, a garment of praise instead of a mournful spirit, that they may be called the righteousness of the Earth, a seedling of the One-who-Is, to serve to His glory.”

What a Jubilee!... Amen!

10 Av: a mirror (prism) day of an eternal Covenant

Perhaps one of the most common themes of the Scriptures is the waiting; a waiting related to seeking, but especially to the fulfillment of a certain time or promise... at the appointed time.

Perhaps one of the outstanding characteristics of the chosen people is the waiting. This people has been in a constant state of waiting, and perhaps this waiting has kept him alive through the ages: “How to die out, when his promises have not yet been fulfilled?!”

This people was born from waiting... Abraham’s waiting for his promised son, Jacob’s waiting first for Rachel, then to return home... Israel’s waiting in Egypt for a deliverer, Moses’ waiting to be told from the burning bush that it was time for a miracle to occur.

This waiting has been accompanied by mistakes. Sometimes a long wait brings doubt, and there have been many cases where, on the eve of the expected moment, the man or the people have found themselves at the worst moment of their waiting, totally unprepared. Even Abraham, the man of the most extraordinary promises, the father of all believers, just before the fulfilment of the promise, fell badly in regard to waiting... finding human solutions to “help” the One-who-Is in the fulfilment of His promises.

But I don’t want to dwell on this day. There are much more important days to dwell on, and the most important of them is the day after the 9th of Av, the day on which the Tent of Meeting was “established”: the 10th of Av.

This Tent of Meeting has been and will forever be the heart through which the One-who-Is has pulsed and will pulsate life (and light) to His chosen people.

I feel compelled to recall certain aspects and to go into details, details that can be missed on a superficial reading of what happened on Mount Sinai, the place where Moses (and Joshua) was invited by the Love, the place where he stayed for forty days, with their evenings and mornings.

Just after the glorious moment of the pronouncement of the Covenant by the One-who-Is, amidst the thunder and lightning on Sinai, the Love called Moses to Himself saying the following words: “Come up to Me on the mountain and stay there. I will give you some tablets of stone with the Law, and [I will give you] the commandments which I have written for their teaching.”

At first glance, or at a cursory glance, it might seem that the Law and the commandments mentioned here are one and the same: the Ten Commandments... but at a closer look at what happened on the mountain we will see that there is a difference between the Law written on tablets of stone and the “commandments given for their teaching”; in other words, Moses, when came down from the mountain, came not only with the two tablets of stone written with the finger of the One-who-Is, but also with the commandments written for their teaching, commandments or law about which it was said: “He shall have it with him and read it all the days of his life, that he may learn to fear the One-who-Is the Love, to keep and do all the words of this law and all these commandments.” “Which one?” - we ask. “For they keep Your word and keep Your covenant. They teach Jacob Your rules [ceremonies], and Israel Your Law: they burn incense before You, and the burnt-offering upon Your altar.”

The Love would not have needed “forty days and forty nights” to write on the tablets of stone the Ten Commandments. What happened on the mountain, and what the One-who-Is wrote before Moses was more than the Ten Commandments, and similar in importance. What was written there begins as follows, “Speak to the children of Israel to bring Me a gift [present]... to make Me a holy place, and I will dwell among them. You shall make the Tent [... and all that is related to it...] according to the image that I shall show you.” And the cascading commandment continues as follows, “You shall do...”, “you shall do”, “you shall do” ... until “You shall keep the Sabbath [...] this shall be between Me and the children of Israel an everlasting sign [...].” ... then He gave him the two tablets of stone with the words spoken by the One-who-Is “out of the midst of the fire on the day [of the Law] when all the people were gathered together.”

On the 9th of Av, Moses (and Joshua) came down from the mountain with the tablets of the Law in his hand, but also with the words of the Covenant written in the book of the everlasting Covenant... commandments concerning the gift (present), the Tent of Meeting.

Forty days and forty nights of waiting had passed. The people of the valley had grown weary in waiting for Moses, and in the meantime they had made for themselves a golden calf and an altar for sacrifices on the day of their feast, eating, drinking and dancing... corrupting themselves into a worship before an unknown god: the father of all lies and deceptions from the beginning, when Eve and Adam also corrupted themselves.

The Love would have destroyed them instantly... with fire would have consumed them... all of Israel, every last one of them, making from Moses the great nation promised to Abraham... apparently... because on that occasion something happened that many people lose sight of: Moses reminded the One-who-Is that the promise of the “great nation” had been given to Abraham, Isaac and Israel, and that the miracle of Israel’s exodus from Egypt, on the basis of that promise, was not in vain. Then and there, apparently, the One-who-Is was indulged by Moses, when in fact the Love had longed for a mediator. Thus, “the One-who-Is changed His mind about the evil He had said He would do to His people.”

Down from the mountain, Moses threw down the tablets of the law before the people, and he crushed them at the base of the mountain in front of the golden calf; he burned the calf in the fire, and made ashes of it, he sprinkled the ashes in the water, and gave it to the people to drink. The sweet wine and merriment had turned to mourning and bitter drink... but, much worse, on that occasion something was lost that even in ages was not recovered.

What did Israel lose on that occasion, besides the death of more than “nearly three thousand” of Abraham's sons and daughters? First, they lost the One-who-Is in His manifestations of God and got instead an “Angel”, the same One-who-Is, but hidden in the Tent of Meeting. He lost the priesthood of the firstborn of every tribe and got a priesthood of Levi. He missed the chance to enter the Promised Land at that time and ended up dead in the wilderness... there was mercy and justice mixed up… But the promises made to Abraham, Isaac and Israel were about a people that mankind would see much later. Although Israel is the people who entered the Promised Land, Israel was not the people that Love had dreamed of from eternity, it was a “lesser” Israel in glory, as is the difference between a God and an angel; Israel was the people of a God hidden in the Tent of Meeting... That is why the miracle performed at the time of the coming out of Egypt has remained as a landmark of the glory and power of the One-who-Is throughout the ages. Although Israel could have been left with the saying: “The Love that brought you to the Promised Land”, for the miracles of entering Canaan would have been far greater than the fall of the walls of Jericho... instead, the saying has remained through the ages: “Love that brought you out of the land of Egypt.” ... but not forever!... oh, no!... but until an appointed time when it will no longer be said “As the One-who-Is lives, who brought up the sons of Israel out of the land of Egypt”.

Coming back to what happened on the 9th of Av, the Scriptures bring forward the following fact: on the next day, the 10th of Av, Moses said to the people, “You have committed a very great sin. I will now go up to the One-who-Is, perhaps I will receive forgiveness for your sin.” And after a while, Moses returns with the verdict of the Love: “I will send an Angel before you”, “I will not come up among you, lest I destroy you”, “but for a moment if I come up among you, My presence will destroy you; but cast off your ornaments, and I will see what mercy I will show you.”

On that day, the 10th of Av, “Moses took his tent and pitched it outside the camp, at some distance, and called it the Tent of Meeting, which was outside the camp [...] when Moses entered the Tent, the pillar of cloud came down and stood at the door of the Tent, and the One-who-Is [the “Angel”] spoke to Moses [...] all the people got up and fell on their faces at the door of their tent. The One-who-Is [the “Angel”] spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend.”

What does, or how can it be explained that Moses met with the One-who-Is and they spoke face to face even though at that time the Tent of Meeting had not yet been built and Moses was not a priest? How come Moses didn’t die, and how come Joshua could stand without fear in the Tent of Meeting... the Shechinah was manifesting, and they still weren’t dying. Why?

Perhaps one of the answers is found in the statement “I have mercy on whom I want to have mercy and I have pity on whom I want to have pity”; words that mirror in their echo the choice of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel... and yet, why did Moses and Joshua not die in the presence of the One-who-Is?

Perhaps the answer is found in the book of the Covenant, which was not torn up along with the tablets of the Law that were shattered. At the moment when Moses moved his tent out of the camp and put it away, Moses had the words of the Covenant with him, provisions that had in view the priesthood, that eternal priesthood that the One-who-Is had in view from the beginning, in the words, “You will be My chosen treasure among all peoples [...], you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests, a holy nation.” “Set apart to Me as holy every firstborn, every firstborn among the children of Israel [...], to consecrate [set apart] to the One-who-Is every firstborn.” … somehow Moses and Joshua stood before the One-who-Is on behalf of the firstborn... firstborn by choice or setting apart... for Moses was chosen in priority to Aaron, just as Jacob was chosen in detriment to Esau.

When on the 10th of Av (the day of Tent) Moses comes down from the One-who-Is, he comes down with something new, something that had not been stipulated before: the redemption of the firstborn. In choosing the tribe of Levi as priests, as a result of the idolatry into which Israel had fallen the day before, the One-who-Is found himself constrained to demand a redemption price for the firstborn of Israel, and this redemption of the firstborn was to last for ages until the priesthood should be restored to its original plan: a priesthood of the firstborn of all the tribes of Israel, a kingly priesthood, reflected in the choice of Abraham, Isaac and Israel... a hidden priesthood in the typology of David... in the typology of the Messiah, the one “anointed and chosen one”... a Moses... something hidden in the words, “I will raise up a prophet like you from among their brethren, and I will put my words in his mouth, and tell them everything I command.”

Beginning with the 10th of Av, the God of Mount Sinai descended into the Tent of Meeting, appointing daily and annual ceremonial services, according to the “commandments given for their teaching”, as the words written in the book of the Covenant. Thus, the One-who-Is descended among Israel teaching them about salvation in the daily continual services, but also in the annual continual services that were depicted in the seven feasts appointed for worship: day by day (on the one hand), and year by year (on the other hand), throughout the ages.

Both the daily and annual ceremonies (the feasts) were and will eternally be an integral part of the Covenant between the One-who-Is and Abraham, Isaac, and Israel... these Covenant acts in their essence were to be messianic... pointing toward the forever deliverance of the chosen people from all forms of captivity, both spiritual and physical... both individually and as a nation. In essence, the ceremonies around the Tent of Meeting and all the prophecies given through the prophets said the same thing: the One-who-Is has chosen His people to be the firstborn of all the nations of the earth, the eternal heir of the World.

Although there is no Tent of Meeting today, the prophecies point to the day when once again all of Israel will be gathered around the ceremonies and feasts of the Covenant... although today there are many voices saying that this will never happen, which is – from the point of view of sacred ceremonies and from the point of view of all messianic prophecies – false... totally false!

What happened on the 10th of Av is a guarantee and a prophecy that the One-who-Is has not forgotten His promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Israel... the fact that Love hid Himself in the Tent of Meeting is a guarantee that God will manifest Himself again as at Sinai and on the occasion of the exodus from Egypt... these intentions of the One-who-Is are found in the essence of all messianic prophecies: “The days are coming, when it shall no more be said: as the One-who-Is lives, who brought forth the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt... but it shall be said: as the One-who-Is lives, who brought up the children of Israel out of the land of the north [Babylon], and out of all the countries whither he had driven them.”

In the feasts of Israel, those ordained by the Love, was hidden this redemption in the end of the age. Although it is generally believed that these feasts do not (any longer) have any prophetic significance in relation to Israel, history and reality show us that they are related especially – not to say “only!” – with Israel.

Firstly, these feasts were part of the Covenant between the One-who-Is with Israel; secondly, they are essentially messianic, meaning that they can only be fulfilled over the ages in correlation with the Messiah... and I will explain why in a moment.

First of all, it must be clarified what is meant in the Scriptures by “Messiah”. Firstly, this word has the connotation of “anointed” or “set apart”. In this sense Abraham was a “Messiah” by being chosen by the One-who-Is... Isaac was a “Messiah” ... Israel, both as Jacob and as a people, was a “Messiah”... in essence the words “Touch not My anointed ones.” are synonymous with “Israel is My son, My firstborn.” ... My chosen one among all the nations of the earth.

“Christians” see in Yeshua (HaMashiach) the fulfillment of the first feast: the Pesach (Passover), “the day on which the lamb was sacrificed for the redemption of the World”. They also see the following two feasts – the feast of unleavened bread and the feast of the first fruits – they see them fulfilled at the cross, in those days; and Shavuot (Pentecost) they see it fulfilled in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit upon the disciples.

I don’t want to focus on these feasts, fulfilled or not. Even their fulfillment is essentially messianic: a man chosen to die for the world, disciples chosen and brought face to face with the disappointment: “We were hoping that he was the one who would redeem Israel”; disciples chosen to receive that power to make them “witnesses in Jerusalem, in all Judea, in Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”

Although the “Christians” see and understand that these feasts were fulfilled around Jerusalem with – essentially – some Jews, they hope that the next (“final” – they say) feasts will be fulfilled with them in a way in which the “messiah” is excluded, which from a scriptural point of view is impossible and false. Why? Because the commandments that were “given for their teaching” are rooted in the Covenant with the Jews... and can only be fulfilled in relationship with them.

“Christians” expect to be “secretly raptured” on one of these “final” feasts, but they do not understand that contrary to their interpretations – generally in relation to this “secret rapture” – the blessing of any of these feasts is about the Jews and can only be fulfilled in a messianic context.

There is a major misunderstanding about the feasts, and the key to the decipherment or clarification is found in the way the requirements regarding the keeping of the Sabbath were formulated. Regardless of people’s opinions, the One-who-Is’ chosen kept the Sabbath from sunset to sunset, and they learned this for forty years in the wilderness at breakfast (and dinner) when five days a week they received a one-day portion of manna, on the sixth day they received a double portion (for both that day and the Sabbath), and on the Sabbath they received nothing. This is the only principle by which the Sabbath is kept: from sunset on the sixth day until sunset on the Sabbath (seventh day), without any other “artifice” in the Sun, Moon, or stars. And because the “Christians” have strayed and wandered from keeping the Sabbath in this way, they have no idea how to interpret the Covenant feasts, because they were given on the same principle: evening-morning-evening.

The years and annual feasts are related to the two agricultural seasons and to the rains set aside for each of these seasons. Israel’s year begins in autumn with the early (“evening”) rain and ends in autumn (“evening”); the spring (“morning”) with its late rains was only a transition to autumn (“evening”) – the New Year (Rosh HaShanah).

At a superficial glance, it might seem that the spring feasts are of major importance, when in fact the opposite is true. The autumn feasts were the major feasts, and the spring feasts were more the landmark of all feasts. This is why the prophet cries saying: “The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are still not delivered.”

It is important to understand this aspect of the “evening”, because it is linked to several major prophecies... unfulfilled until the appointed time... the “evening” between days, years, and ages.

When we look through the prism of “evening” at the 10th Av, the day of the Tent, a day hidden just as the One-who-Is hid Himself in the Tabernacle, we see what is not normally seen, that the day of 1st Tishrei is anchored in the 10th Av (day of the Tent) as Shavuot (Pentecost) is anchored in the Pesach (Passover). This aspect gives to the feast of the New Year (Rosh HaShanah) connotations of the Pesach (the first feast of spring) as well as making the feast of the New Year (Rosh HaShanah) a second Shavuot (Pentecost). Here is the key that opens the door to the true meaning of the 1st Tishrei, the New Year, Rosh HaShanah, the Day of Trumpets (shofars).

From the point of view of the eternal priesthood of the firstborn, Rosh HaShanah is and will be the most important holiday, a day called Yom Teruah (Day of Trumpets); a day with the sound of war... a day of redemption, but also a day of vengeance... a messianic day – as Jews understand this word.

“Christians” expect the “rapture”, but it’s more than likely that things and events will surprise them. Those targeted for damnation may actually be blessed, and those targeted for glory may be put on the run... and not for the first time. The events surrounding Mordecai (the feast of Purim) were similar: a gallows had been prepared for the Jew, but instead he got the king's (white) horse and the king's (white) clothes.

Mankind has never understood what it means that the One-who-Is has chosen Israel... an Israel that have done much sin, but who has received from the hand of the One-who-Is twice as much as his due punishment. This is where mankind has fallen into the trap, and I am referring to the “Christians” in general... they laughed at who was not supposed to laugh... but Israel have done his punishment. “Give good news to Jerusalem and cry to her that her slavery is ended, for her iniquity has been atoned, for she has received from the hand of the One-who-Is twice as much as all her sins.” “Instead of your shame, you shall have a doubled honor; instead of humiliation, they shall rejoice on their part of the inheritance, for they shall rule doubly in their own land and have everlasting joy”... this is truly a messianic understanding of what the Love will do for Israel... “a year of mercy from the One-who-Is and a day of vengeance from our Love”, “a royal crown”, “an anointing of joy”, “a garment of praise”... a new purpose: servants to His glory... a holy priesthood... “but you shall be called priests of the One-who-Is, and shall be called servants of the Love; you shall eat the riches of the nations and in their glory you will shine.”

You may ask yourself: how is this possible?... simple: the One-who-Is set a trap for the nations, and the nations fell into it... How did this happen?... simple: “I set a trap for you, and you were caught, Babylon, without expecting it. You got caught, trapped, because you fought against the One-who-Is.”

A correct understanding of what Babylon means in relation to the chosen people we can only find three meanings, no more. First, by (a) Babylon is meant the nation that in ancient times on the 9th of Av was responsible for the destruction of the first Temple (Tent of Meeting) and taking Israel into physical captivity. Then, when we read (b) Babylon we see the golden image built by the king of Babylon, an image which according to the dream interpreted by Daniel represented four kingdoms that were to appear on the firmament of history until the end of the age, and the first of them was Babylon, the most significant of the kingdoms. Finally, when we read in the prophecy about (c) Babylon, we understand a “spiritual” kingdom which by its own teachings originating in Babylon made itself ruler over the whole earth... a kingdom opposed to the chosen people, a “Babylon” present over the whole earth, a place from which all the elects were to be gathered at the end of the age.

This Babylon spread its influence (and teachings) also over the other kingdoms that followed later, the last of them being Rome, that Rome which on the 9th of Av in the year 70 was to destroy once again the Temple (the Tent of Meeting), and which, even more, through one of the ten kings derived from it was to “change the times and the Law”... action which refers to a single operation of change in relation to the Law and the time or season of worship... a kingdom originating in Rome which was to change the day of rest from Sabbath to Sunday... a kingdom which became “Papal Rome”, “Christianity”... in a word, “Babylon”.

Strangely, this “Christianity” (“Rome”) not only changed the time for worship specified in the Law, but it also has assumed the Levitical attributes, distorting the “commandments given for their teaching” and making from the Church an idolatrous copy (“icon”) of the Tent of Meeting, thus taking full advantage of Rome’s destruction of the Temple... in this context the words of the prophet are even clearer: “I set a trap for you, and you were caught, Babylon, without expecting it. You got caught, trapped, because you fought against the One-who-Is.”

“Rome”, the spiritual Babylon, is essentially a counter (anti!) invention to all that is spiritually authentic. For a while she tried to keep the Scriptures under lock and key, because the Scriptures were identifying her as being the Antichrist; was indeed and is anti-Messianic, anti-Semitic, anti-Sabbatical, anti-Levitical. So, in order to “exonerate” herself and to further appear to be the savior of the whole earth, a universal “authentic” spiritual institution, she invented all sorts of doctrines, and finally, in her bowl of lying abominations, she invented the doctrine of the “secret rapture”, which says that there will be seven years at the end, and while the Church will be raptured to God in Heaven, in Jerusalem will be installed exactly the “antichrist”... and to top it off, all of “Christianity” believes her... as they have swallowed other lizard babies... uncleanness, Serpent teachings, demons and lies... until one day... until the day when Babylon will fall: “And there shall no more be heard in you the sound of harps, nor songs of instruments, nor singers of whistles, nor singers of trumpets […] the light of the lamp shall no more shine in you, and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall no more be heard in you, because your merchants were the rulers of the earth, because all the nations were deceived by your witchcraft, and because there was found the blood of the prophets and of the saints and of all the [good] that were slain in the earth.”

Returning to the 10th of Av, the day of the Tent of Meeting, and the day to which its Pentecost pointed, Yom Teruah (Rosh HaShanah), we could say that in this day is hidden the Day of Deliverance... a day similar to the exodus from Egypt, but on a much larger, universal scale. This is one of the reasons why by what the One-who-Is will do this time, He will make the exodus from Egypt to be eclipsed, because this time Egypt (“Babylon”) is the whole earth, a “Babylon” from which all those chosen of Love will be delivered and redeemed. In other words, Passover (Pesach), and Pentecost (Shavuot) will be reissued, and this time the one who will eat bitter herbs will be “Babylon” ... “Rome”.

“Christians” say that on Shavuot (Pentecost) was fulfilled the prophecy that says: “Suddenly, I will pour out My Spirit on the whole of the world; your sons and daughters will prophesy, your elders will dream dreams, and your young men will see visions. Even upon my servants, both men and women, I will pour out My Spirit in those days.”, turning this Jewish feast into the founding day of Christianity. But they are missing something important. There are two aspects that “Christians” miss: (a) Peter put this prophecy in an eschatological context, saying “In the last days.” and (b) this prophecy was strictly about Israel and Yom Teruah (Day of Trumpets): “Sound the trumpet in Zion”, “proclaim a fast”, “assemble a feast”, “gather the people”, “assemble a holy meeting”, “the bridegroom shall come out from his bedroom and the bride from the house of her bridal chamber”, “let the priests, the servants of the One-who-Is, weep between the Porch and the altar”... “and you will know that I am in the midst of Israel”, “and my people will never again be a shame”, “I will cause wonders to be seen in heaven and on earth”, “the sun will turn to darkness and the moon to blood”, “then, whosoever shall call on the name of the One-who-Is shall be saved. For salvation will be on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, as the One-who-Is promised, and among the remnant who will be called [“chosen”] by the One-who-Is. For behold, in those days and at those times when I will bring back [from “Rome”] the captives of Judah and Jerusalem [the twelve tribes together], I will gather all the nations [...]. There I will judge with them for My people, for Israel, My inheritance, which they have scattered among the nations, dividing among them My land.”

“Christians” are expecting the “rapture” from the great tribulation, in return they will receive a judgment... Yom Kippur... a year of vengeance of the One-who-Is... a fulfillment of all eschatological prophecies, which are essentially messianic... “At that time, the branch of the One-who-Is shall be full of majesty and glory, and the fruit of the land shall be full of brightness and beauty for the delivered of Israel. And whoever is remaining [one will be taken] in Son, whoever is left [another will be left] in Jerusalem, will be called holy, whoever is written among the living in Jerusalem [...]. The One-who-Is will set over all the whole length of Mount Zion and over its gathering places a cloud of smoke by day and bright fires by night [His tabernacle; Sukkot].” “A branch shall come forth from the stem of Jesse [David], and a shoot shall spring from his roots. The Spirit of the One-who-Is shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and strength, the Spirit of knowledge and fear of the One-who-Is. His delight shall be the fear of the One-who-Is; he shall not judge according to his appearance, nor decide according to what he has heard, but shall judge the poor with righteousness, and shall decide with impartiality over the oppressed of the land; he shall shake the earth with the word of his mouth [(a) authority; prophet], and with the word of his lips he shall put an end to wickedness [(b) judgment; king]. Righteousness shall be the girdle of his loins [(c) sanctification; priest] and faithfulness the girdle of his middle [(a, b, c); Messiah].” “In the age to come, Jacob will take root, Israel will flourish and branch out and fill the world with its fruit.” “There shall be nothing but righteous men among your people; they shall possess the land forever as a branch planted by Me, the work of My hands, to serve to My glory. The least shall become a thousand, and the least a mighty nation.” “Behold, the days are coming when I will raise up to David a righteous branch. He shall reign, he shall work with wisdom, and he shall execute justice and judgment in the land. In his days, Judah shall be delivered, and Israel shall have peace in his dwelling place; and this is the name they will give to the One-who-Is: our Righteousness [why?].”

When you truly understand eschatological prophecies, you cannot sneak into them a doctrine like the “rapture” ... because there’s no such thing anywhere. Raptured indeed will be the chosen ones of Love from “Babylon”, gathered and brought home to the land promised to their fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Israel... this is the only correct interpretation of the rapture that overlaps with the separation of wheat from tares, of sheep from goats, of good from evil, of wise virgins from unwise... “let them both grow together until the harvest; and at the time of harvest [end of the age; evening; autumn], I will say to the harvesters [the angels]: First pluck the tares, and bind them in bundles, that we may burn them; and my wheat gather them into my barn.” “I have also other sheep, which are not from this stable; and I must bring them too. They shall obey My voice, and they will be a flock and a shepherd [David].” “I will raise up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David: he shall feed them, he shall be their shepherd.” “They shall be Mine; they shall be a special treasure to Me in the day that I prepare; I will have mercy on them as a man has mercy on his son who serves him.... and then you will see again the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, between the one who serves the One-who-Is and the one who does not.”

“In the last days [end of the age; evening], the mountain of the house of the One-who-Is shall be established as the highest mountain, and shall be exalted above the hills, and the peoples shall come flocking to it. The nations will flock to it and say: Come, let us go up to the mountain of the One-who-Is, to the House of Jacob’s Love, that He may teach us His ways [the commandments given for their teaching] to walk in His paths.... For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and out of Jerusalem the word of the One-who-Is... He [the king] shall judge between many nations, he shall decide between the mighty nations that are far off. And they shall make their swords into plowshares, and their spears into sickles; no nation shall draw sword against another, neither shall they learn war anymore.”

I attempted to be as succinct as possible, I didn’t succeed... the truth is simple and doesn’t need a lot of explanation. The truth about the feasts and ceremonial acts correlated with the Tent of Meeting, seen through the lens of all the eschatological prophets is clear, unitary, and secure: Israel was and is forever the apple of the eye of the One-who-Is Love, who chose him from the beginning. Although he has fallen and has had many slippages in relation to the Law and the commandments that he has received from the One-who-Is, and although not once he has been punished and seemingly abandoned, Israel will forever remain the chosen son. With him are fulfilled and will be fulfilled eternally the words of David, who says: The Lord is my Shepherd: I shall not want. He leads me into green pastures and leads me to resting waters; He refreshes my soul and guides me in right paths for His name’s sake. Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for You are with me. Thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me. Thou spread my table before mine enemies, Thou anoint my head with oil, and my cup is full of it. Yes, happiness and mercy will accompany me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the House of the One-who-Is until the end of my [eternal] days.”

Israel has always known that it’s a matter of days, years, or ages... and they waited... which will be considered righteousness... I repeat: one of the most common themes of the Scriptures is the waiting; a waiting related to seeking, but especially to the fulfillment of a certain time or promise... at the appointed time.

At the appointed time... in the evening... the One-who-Is will turn his face towards the people who not only once lost him, but... there is a “but”! ... the One-who-Is will return... and all the earth will see again Who is the Love but also the Avenger of the people He has chosen. “In the evening, the lord of the vineyard said to his steward: call the workers and give them their wages, from the last [second Pentecost?] to the first [...]. Likewise, the last shall be first, and the first shall be last [the ancient Israel]; for many are called, but few [Abraham, Isaac, and Israel] are chosen.”

“Behold, the voice of your watchmen sounds; they lift up their voice and all shout for joy, for they see with their eyes how the One-who-Is is returning to Zion. All of you shout for joy, o you ruins of Jerusalem! For the One-who-Is comforts His people and redeems Jerusalem. The One-who-Is reveals His holy arm before all nations, and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our Elohim.”

“Blessed be the One-who-Is the Love of Israel, the only one who works miracles! Blessed be His eternally glorified name! Let all the earth be filled with His glory! Amen! Amen!”

The Day of the Law; the Day deliberately forgotten at Sinai

Indeed, the Day on which One-who-Is pronounced – amidst thunder and lightning, with the sound of a trumpet and with earthquake – the Law on Mount Sinai, before the chosen people, that memorable Day has been forgotten in history. The One-who-Is did not intentionally command the commemoration of that magnificent Day by any celebration at the Temple... why? The answer is that the One-who-Is saved the commemoration of that Day for a special time at the end of history, or special for the time of the end... why?

But before I begin to speak of that event – the Day of the Law – which took place in the third month after the exit from Egypt, and before I begin by pointing out the relation of that great event of the past to the vision which the angel Gabriel was sent from heaven to explain (Dan 9:24-27) to Daniel, pointing out that this vision has in view distant times or the time of the end, I must make a few clarifications:

a) this vision has in view the chosen people situated on the firmament of history at the end of the age, according to the intention of the One-who-Is that this vision be understood at the time of the end;

b) all attempts to interpret (understand) this vision until the time of the end are a failure... why? Because this vision was sealed until the time of the end; because this vision was left specifically to be deciphered by a prophet whom the One-who-Is has promised to send „before the day of the One-who-Is, that great and dreadful day”. This is why everyone has failed to interpret this vision... all the rabbis, all the priests and teachers, all the traducers... all of them! Only the Spirit-of-prophecy can bring light to the understanding of this prophecy. This vision has nothing to do with any „Christian” interpretation, for it has always been in the mind of the One-who-Is that this vision should bring to mind the final deliverance of the chosen people, their bringing home from every corner of the earth; this vision has to do with the coming of the promised deliverer, the deliverer promised in all the prophecies about the messiah: „the servant of the One-who-Is”, „the branch (rod)”, „the son of David”, „the ruler”... the „Christians” have forced the interpretation of the „messianic” prophecies, they have put capital letters for the „servant” of the One-who-Is, and they have forced an interpretation of this vision that takes Yeshua (HaMashiach) into account; they, on the principle that a day in prophecy sometimes represents a calendar year, started from the giving of the decree of Artaxerxes (457-456 BC), adding 69 weeks (483 years), reaching the last week, the one divided in two, bringing to mind that in AD 28 Yeshua (HaMashiach) began his ministry, that halfway through the week (AD 32) he was crucified and resurrected, and 3.5 years later (AD 35), through Paul’s mission, they say, the One-who-Is turned His attention exclusively to the Gentiles while the chosen people were cast off forever... which is grossly untrue;

c) this vision is rather an extension of what is meant by „that day”, a day of vengeance or a year of redemption for the chosen people... this prophecy is in harmony with all eschatological prophecies which emphasize the latter-day prophesying of the holy and chosen people as a culmination of the eternal desire of the One-who-Is to manifest Himself gloriously through His chosen people. The whole book of Daniel is built on this structure of the stone that strikes as a vengeance of the One-who-Is in all the kingdoms that have oppressed His people, beginning with Babylon and ending with Rome, a Rome present today in a political-religious system, a system that has manipulated throughout the ages the Scriptures and has been in a continuous struggle with the pure truth and the chosen people. This vision speaks of the last 490 days of present history, this vision speaks of about 490 days of the blessing of the One-who-Is upon His people as an outpouring of love, of expectation, of a desire to embrace His prodigal son, but a son welcomed home with all love. „They will be Mine – says the One-who-Is – they will be a special treasure to Me on the day I prepare; I will have mercy on them as a man has mercy on his son who serves him. And then you will see again the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, between the one who serves God and the one who does not serve Him.” „For I am the One-who-Is, I do not change; therefore, you children of Jacob have not been destroyed.”

19 Sivan – the Day of the Law – a day hidden at the foot of the Mount Sinai

We have no problem identifying the day when the chosen people came out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. And the ease of identifying that day lies not in the brightness of the moon in the sky, but in the fact that the One-who-Is took care to ensure that that day would remain in the memory of all generations to come, establishing a feast for this purpose, a kind of pillar of remembrance on the foreheads and hands of His children delivered from bondage; it is the essence of the Passover feast, when the lamb was slaughtered and eaten in haste on the night of the day when the holy people left bondage.

It is not so easy for us to identify exactly the Day when the One-who-Is manifested Himself in all His glory on Mount Sinai, amid thunder and lightning, with the angel’s trumpet and the earthquake. Why has the One-who-Is neglected to keep in memory the Day when He made Himself known as the One-who-Is the only God, the One who brought His son Israel out of the land of Egypt? We have no reason to believe that that Day was not an important day; on the contrary, there is no Day in the history of the chosen people more important than the Day on which God pronounced His covenant with His people, saying: „I-Am the One-who-Is your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You have seen what I did to Egypt, and how I carried you on eagles’ wings and brought you here to Me. Now if you will obey My voice and keep My covenant, you shall be Mine among all peoples, for all the earth is Mine; you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”

The One-who-Is has deliberately omitted to keep in memory this very special Day: the Day of the Covenant. The One-who-Is has preserved for His end-time elect the celebration of this Day, because of all the generations throughout all time since Abraham, this generation was to be – in His plan – the most special. Why? Because it is the end-time generation and the generation of the redeemer. In fact, this generation is the generation that the One-who-Is had in mind from the beginning, from the day He chose Abraham, it is the generation that will fulfill all of God’s original purpose; it is the generation of the truly firstborn – sons and daughters – chosen and formed especially for His glory, a generation of kings and queens; after all, this is one of the important themes of the message from Heaven through Daniel: „But the saints of the Most High shall receive the Kingdom and rule the Kingdom forever and ever, from everlasting to everlasting.” Thus, it will be shown that this Day of the Covenant is both connected with the coming of the deliverer and with the putting of Israel back in its proper place: the firstborn among all the nations of the earth.

There is speculation about the place of this Day in the calendar. People, more or less special, have placed this Day according to their reckoning in the calendar. Moses did not place it where some people say, and on this subject „oral tradition” has nothing to do with the Spirit-of-prophecy. Not Moses, nor any other prophet, has so far marked the place of this Day in the calendar, to be clear! On the other hand, the Scriptures are elephant clear on this subject... you just have to see it through the eyes of the One-who-Is!

In connection with this Day, the Scriptures say through Moses that the moment of the glorious manifestation on Mount Sinai of the One-who-Is took place in the third month after the exit from Egypt. Most translators (teachers) forcibly place the time of the arrival of the chosen people at Mount Sinai on the first day of the third month, although the message conveyed through Moses was different, and the intention of the One-who-Is was marked by the words „on that day” („yom” + „zeh”; Exo 19:1)... the Revelator’s intention was to communicate that exactly three months after leaving Egypt, exactly on the fourteenth day of the third month, the people of Israel reached Mount Sinai... further, Moses relates that on three occasions he went up the Mount (Exo 19:3; 19:9; 19:10) to the One-who-Is, these three occasions being reflected in three consecutive days: the 15th of the third month, the 16th of the third month, and the 17th of the third month. On this seventeenth day, the One-who-Is addressed to Moses and commanded to the chosen people as follows (Exodus 19:10-11): „Go to the people, sanctify them today and tomorrow, and have them wash their clothes. Let them be ready for the third day, for on the third day [19th of the third month] the One-who-Is will come down before all the people on Mount Sinai.” Coincidentally or not, that Day (19 Sivan) was a Sabbath day, a day in which from the first hour the people of Israel were at the foot of the Mount, a day in which no manna fell, for on that Day the One who came down from Heaven was the One-who-Is the Bread-of-life.

It is noteworthy that two months after leaving Egypt, on the fifteenth day of the second month, not the first day, the chosen people met for the first time with manna, the food from heaven, and from that mid of month and full moon, the people of Israel learned to keep the Sabbath. For that time, the people who had come out of bondage (without sophisticated knowledge of astronomy) found it much easier to keep count of the new moons by referring to the full moon, from which full moon they counted fifteen days to determine the next month; the One-who-Is thus lowering Himself to the level of His little ones’ comprehension. On the other hand, by choosing the fifteenth day as the moment of the beginning of the experience of making Himself known to His people through the miracle of the manna, the One-who-Is wanted to give us a model so that we would not be confused about the day on which the chosen people arrived at Mount Sinai. Let us not forget that the One who determined the speed of His people’s advance to Mount Sinai was the One-who-Is, because the people moved in the rhythm and steps of the pillar of fire by night and the pillar of cloud by day... in other words, the One-who-Is led His people in such a way that they would receive the Law and the covenant on a Sabbath day, on the nineteenth day of the third month (19 Sivan), the most special and important Day for the chosen people, the Day of the Law and the covenant!... a covenant broken and lost a few days later... regrettably, exactly 49 days later, on 9 Av.

On the next day – after the Day of the Law –, on the evening of the day that was beginning, the 20th of Sivan, Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu went up with Moses to the One-who-Is, and were joined by seventy elders of Israel to worship the One-who-Is from afar. On that occasion, Moses went down to the people and spoke all the words of the covenant, to which the people responded with an oath: „We will do all that the One-who-is has said”... then early in the morning Moses built an altar at the foot of the Mount and „set up twelve stones for the twelve tribes of Israel.” And the firstborn of each tribe of Israel brought burnt-offerings and peace offerings to the One-who-Is, and the altar was sprinkled with the blood of the bulls, and the words of the covenant were read before all the people, and all the people swore, „We will do and obey all that the Lord has said,” and Moses sealed the covenant – sprinkling the blood of the sacrifice on the people – with the words: „This is the blood of the covenant which the Lord has made with you by all these words.”

On the 21st day of Sivan Moses, Aaron, Nadab, Abihu, and the seventy elders, went up again to the Mount, they saw the Lord, eating and drinking before him. The next day, 22 Sivan, the One-who-Is called Moses to Him to give him the two tablets of stone with the Law of the covenant, and „the commandments written for their teaching.” Moses went up the Mount with Joshua, the cloud covered the Mount, and Moses waited six days. On the seventh day, the 28th of Sivan, the One-who-Is called Moses to Him. „Moses went into the midst of the cloud and went up on the Mount. Moses remained on the Mount for forty days and forty nights.”... 28 Sivan + 40 days = 9 Av.

When the „forty days and forty nights” ended, it was the morning of the 9th of Av, a Sabbath day. Moses and Joshua came down from the Mount of the One-who-Is with the tablets of the covenant, and with the commandments (Exo 25:1 >> 31:17) written on the papyrus by the One-who-Is, commandments which stipulated all the sacramental elements by which the One-who-Is intended to teach His people the principles underlying true worship and implicitly the principles of salvation: the laws and requirements concerning the ceremonies of the Tabernacle. Coming down from the Mount, the two messengers of the One-who-Is heard a great noise among the people at the foot of the Mount. Not the song of victory and of the covenant was heard, on the contrary, there was dancing and rejoicing in an unprecedented drift into idolatry; the people in the meantime had made for themselves a golden calf before which they laid in dance and rejoicing all their gratitude for their deliverance from Egypt... it was an apparent deliverance, because Egypt – and its idols – was still within them. What an evil day, and what a Sabbath?! The day that should have been a sealing of blessing and covenant – expressed in the harshness of the tablets on which the Law was written – was instead one of the darkest days in all the history of the chosen people, a day in which Moses’ breaking of the tablets of the Law also portrayed a suspension of some of the covenant clauses of the One-who-Is. The original intention of the One-who-Is that from the firstborn of the twelve tribes a special sowing of priests should be made, has been for ages – until now – suspended. For the first time in the history of the chosen people the 9th of Av was a day of bitterness, especially in the heart of the One-who-Is.

The One-who-Is on that very day of the 9th of Av apparently implied that He wanted to destroy all the people; in reality He relied on the mercy of Moses and in a certain sense the One-who-Is begged Moses’ intercession for His people. Although at first glance one might think that the One-who-Is might have abandoned Himself by refusing to go on to lead His people, in reality He led His people on to the Promised Land.

The catastrophic incident of the fall into idolatry at the foot of Mount Sinai is not the only occasion when the chosen people encountered the manifestation of the disappointment of the One-who-Is on the day of the 9th of Av... oh no! This people has encountered this day twice more later. One would say it is a cursed day, but it has nothing to do with its place in the calendar. It was not the day that was cursed, but the wanderings of this people after foreign gods... but, most likely, the One-who-Is has chosen this day, the 9th of Av, repeatedly to express His disapproval of the wanderings of His chosen people in ways foreign to the truth.

After the chosen people arrived in the Promised Land, after they had set up a king and later built a Temple, where all the ceremonies of the Tabernacle were set in motion, after the death of David and Solomon, the chosen people drifted unchecked back into idolatry. In fact, Israel’s entire history from the time of their settlement in the Promised Land was a continual dance between true worship and idol worship of the surrounding peoples, as if the one true God was never enough for this hungry and continually thirsty people after idols. All the actions of the One-who-Is to bring His people to the way of truth, actions carried out through His sent prophets, have been to no avail; the people have behaved for most of their history like chickens which, instead of seeking the protection of their brood, have always fled into the mouth of the serpent. Of course, these actions of the people have always been encouraged by the „leaders” of the people at the time: idolatrous kings, false prophets and teachers of the Scriptures whose interest was not truth or true worship... so the chosen people found themselves with a new manifestation of the disapproval of the One-who-Is, similar to the one on the 9th of Av when they were at the foot of Mount Sinai, but this time the Temple itself, on the 9th of Av, was destroyed by Babylon which was to take the chosen people into captivity for seventy years... once again the One-who-Is suspended His covenant, lifting up His protective wings, and leaving His people in the curse of visible and less visible sorcerers, whose worship they had borrowed... but at what cost!

Returning from the captivity of seventy years, back from Babylon, the people of the One-who-Is, with difficulty built the second Temple, a Temple that reflected little of the brilliance of the Temple built by Solomon; it was a picture of the state of affairs between the chosen people and the God who brought them out of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. The diluted brilliance of the Second Temple also pointed to a covenant stripped of all the brilliance of the original intentions of the One-who-Is. We would be naïve to think that the people who came out of Babylonian captivity did not come with tattoos in their hearts of false worship from the place where they had lain for seventy years. Although since that time – of returning home – the people have been very careful not to slip into idolatry, they have slipped into something else, just as bad, if not worse than before... because idols can take many forms, idols can also take the form of words or teachings totally opposed to the truth of the Scriptures.

The people built synagogues, schools where they learned about the One-who-Is and worship. They began to defend teachings issued by „special” men („teachers” of renown); they translated the Scriptures into Greek... but the teachings were a mixture of pure truth that came through Moses and the prophets, but also added teachings crocheted in Babylon, some with Ishmaelite and Babylonian colors, and others, later, with Hellenistic and Roman colors.

If I were to ask the teachers of the chosen people today what is the reason why the One-who-Is once again showed His disapproval of His people in AD 70, by the destruction of the Second Temple by Rome on the very 9th of Av, no one(!) could identify the reason: idolatry! Why is it hard to identify it? Because at that time Israel’s idolatry was in a different form than that present at the destruction of the first Temple... and worse, this form of idolatry is still present today!

If the chosen people, during their captivity in Babylon, had an identification of sin – idolatry! – and had a basis for repentance – „because of our sins and because of the iniquities of our fathers Jerusalem and Your people are a reproach to all those around us” –, on the occasion of the destruction of the second Temple, the chosen people could not identify their sin, did not know what guilt to confess, which is why the mercy of the One-who-Is was not manifested for seventy years, but for ages or centuries... the proof: the redeemer has not come; Israel is still scattered among the Gentiles; today there is no Temple, not even the Tabernacle... that is, the messianic prophecies are still unfulfilled.

The question legitimately arises: how do we know that the blame – as always – lies with the spiritual leaders (or not) of the holy people? How do we know that there is anything rotten, idolatrous, deadly, or unclean in the teachings of the spiritual leaders of the chosen people? First of all, for thousands of years they have not been able to identify the connection between the 19 Sivan with the 9 Av... nor the correlation of these dates with the coming of the deliverer... then, more importantly, the Scriptures prophetically say that at the coming of the redeemer, the One-who-Is has a life and death issue with the spiritual leaders of His people, which is why He says – promise! – that He will set over His people one shepherd and one king, the son of David, His servant, His branch (rod)... the promised deliverer at the end of history!

I quote some prophecies:

„For thus speaks the God, the One-who-Is: Behold, I Myself will care for My sheep and will search them out! As a shepherd searches his flock when he is among his scattered sheep, so will I search My sheep and gather them from all the places where they have been scattered in the day of clouds and darkness [for the Gentiles]. And I will bring them out from among the peoples, and gather them out of the countries, and bring them back to their own land; and I will feed them on the mountains of Israel, and along the rivers, and in all the inhabited places of the land. [...] And you, My sheep... thus says the One-who-Is God: Behold, I will judge between sheep and sheep, between rams and goats: is it too little for you to graze in the good pasture, that ye tread down the other side of your pasture? That you drink the one clear water, that you also trouble the other with your feet? And My sheep must then graze what you have trodden with your feet, and drink what you have troubled with your feet! [...] And I will set one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even My servant David; and he shall feed them, and be their shepherd. I, the One-who-Is, I will be their God, and My servant David will be their ruler. I, the One-who-Is, I have spoken! I will make a covenant of peace with them [...] They shall no more be a spoil among the nations, neither shall the beasts of the land eat them, but they shall dwell in peace, and none shall trouble them. I will plant them a seedling whose fame shall be gone; they shall no more be devoured by famine in the land, nor bear the reproach of the nations.” Eze 31:11-31

„And tell them: Thus says the One-who-Is God: Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the nations to whom they have gone, and will gather them from all sides, and bring them back to their own land. And I will make of them one nation in the land, in the mountains of Israel; and they shall all have one king, and there shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms. Neither shall they defile themselves any more with their idols, with their abominations, and with all their transgressions. I will bring them out of all their transgressions, and I will cleanse them; they shall be My people, and I will be their God. My servant David shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd. They will follow my commandments, keep my laws, and do them. They shall dwell again in the land which I gave to my servant Jacob, and which your fathers also dwelt in. Yes, they and their children and their children’s children shall dwell in it forever, and My servant David shall be their prince forever. And I will make a covenant of peace with them, and it shall be an everlasting covenant with them; and I will plant them, and multiply them, and put My Holy Place among them forever. My dwelling place will be among them; I will be their God and they will be My people. And the nations will know that I-Am the One-who-Is, who sanctifies Israel, when My Holy Place is in their midst forever.” Eze 37:21-28

„Take heed, O Shepherd of Israel, You who lead Joseph like a flock! Show Thyself in Thy brightness, Thou who sitting upon cherubim! Awaken Thy power before Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh, and come to our help! Lift us up, O God, make Your face to shine, and we shall be delivered! God of hosts, turn again! Look down from heaven and see! Search this vine! Protect that which Thy right hand hath sown and Thy chosen son! [...] Let Thy hand be upon the man of Thy right hand, upon the son of the man whom Thou hast chosen. And then we shall not depart from Thee. Make us strong again, and we will call upon Your Name! O, the One-who-Are, God of hosts, raise us up again! Make Thy face to shine, and we shall be delivered!” Ps 80:1-3,14-19

„And I Myself will gather the remnant of My sheep out of all the countries where I have driven them; I will bring them back to their pasture, and they shall grow and multiply. [...] „Behold, the days are coming – says the One-who-Is – when I will raise up to David a righteous branch [rod]. He shall reign, he shall work with wisdom, and he shall execute justice and judgment in the land. In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall have peace in his dwelling place; and this is the name they shall give to the One-who-Is: Our righteousness! Therefore, behold, the days are coming, says the One-who-Is, when it shall no longer be said: The living is the One-who-Is, who brought forth the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt... But it shall be said: The living the One-who-Is, who brought forth and brought back the seed of the house of Israel out of the land of the north, and out of all the countries in which they were scattered... And they shall dwell in their own land.” Jer 23:3-8

„I’ll gather you up entirely, Jacob! I will gather the remnant of Israel, I will gather them like sheep in a fold, like a flock [and a shepherd] in its pasture, so that there shall be a great tumult of people. He who makes a breach [against ‘Babylon’] shall go up before them; they shall make a breach, and go through the gate, and come out through it; their king shall go before them, and the One-who-Is shall be at their head.” Mic 2:12-13

„Come, and I will tell you what this people will do to your people in the times to come [the end times; in that day]. I see him, but not now; I behold him, but not near. A star rises out of Jacob, a rod of leadership rises out of Israel. He pierces the sides of Moab and destroys all the children of Seth. He makes himself ruler over Edom, he makes himself ruler over Seir, his enemies. Israel does great works. He who is born of Jacob reigns as ruler and loses those who escape from the cities. Alas! Who [of the wicked] will be able to live when God does this?” Num 24:14,17-19,23

„Behold, I will send My servant; he shall prepare the way before Me. And suddenly the prince whom you seek will come in his place; the covenant servant, whom you desire, behold, he is coming – says the One-who-Is. But who will be able to face the day of his coming? Who will be left standing when he appears?” Mal 3:1-2

„Behold, I will bring My servant, the branch. For behold, only to this stone [the Law] which I have set before Joshua [priest, being the firstborn; typology for Zadok, the branch] are seven eyes [the Spirit-of-prophecy] turned; behold, I Myself will engrave [I have engraved] what must be engraved on it – says the One-who-is – and in one day I will remove the iniquity of this land. In that day – says the One-who-Is – you will invite one another under the vine and under the fig tree.” Zec 3:8-10

Contrary to many misconceptions, the most important year in history, when the Lamb of Love – through His death on “an altar” on the outskirts of Jerusalem – was sacrificed, is AD 32.

The Scriptures and the testimony of history point to AD 32 as the YEAR OF THE SACRIFICE!... not AD 31, not AD 33... no other year!

How do we know that?

a) Daniel's prophecy of the seventy weeks:

The Artaxerxes’ decree for the rebuilding of the Jerusalem, 456 BC (3521 yF / 503 sF).

456 BC + 69 w | 456 BC + 483 y = AD 28 # the beginning of Yeshua 3.5-year mission

3521 yF (503 sF) + 483 y (69 w) = 4004 yF (572 sF) # AD 28

456 BC + 70 w | 456 BC + 490 y = AD 35 # the beginning of the mission to the Gentiles; Paul.

3521 yF (503 sF) + 490 y (70 w) = 4011 yF (573 sF) # AD 35

AD 28 + 3.5 y = AD 32 | AD 35 - 3.5 y = AD 32

_______

yF = years since the Fall

sF = sabbatical years since the Fall

b) The birth of Yeshua (HaMashiach)

The time of His conception in Mary’s womb was 10 Nissan 3997 yC (571 sC) / 4 BC.

The birth took place at the beginning of the following year, 3998 yC / 3 BC.

The birth took place in 3974 yF / 3 BC.

When Yeshua (HaMashiach) began His mission, He was “about thirty years old” (30 y).

3 BC + 30 y = AD 28.

4028 yC - 3998 yC = 30 y

4004 yF (572 sF) - 3974 yF = 30 y

_______

yC = years since Adam’s “birth” / Creation

sC = sabbatical years since Adam’s “birth” / Creation

c) The “fifteenth” year of Tiberius Caesar Augustus

The time when John the Baptist began his ministry was “the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar”. Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus died on 19 August AD 14, passing the throne to Tiberius Caesar.

AD 14 (first year) + 14 y (15 - 1) = AD 28 # the year Yeshua (HaMashiach) began His ministry, and 3.5 years later, on 14 Nissan AD 32 He was crucified.

d) AD 32 is the only year in which the Lamb of Love, that “was slain from the foundation of the world”, could die.

AD 32 / 4032 yC is the only sabbatical year (576 sC) since the “birth of Adam” in which the Lamb of Love could be sacrificed.

AD 32 (the year of sacrifice) and 4 BC (the year of conception) are the only sabbatical years that are correlated with Creation, all the other dates to which prophecy points are correlated with the year of the fall into sin, being its sabbatical periods:

AD 28 (4004 yF), AD 35 (4011 yF), AD 70 (4046 yF), AD 2023 (5999 yF).

My sweet princess, Bea... it was 5:12 when I looked at the watch... I had just woken up from a dream where there was a round table of two people eating together in the back of a pickup van... we were us... the van was in the middle of an intersection, and around it were people gathered especially for this event... in all the streets there were many people, like a kind of demonstration, gathered... they had come to that event... the eating together of the two... me and you... and everyone was clapping continuously... even a subtitle appeared... as if the whole thing was a successful, award-winning film... with happy ending... on the subtitle was written: “at the request... adaptation and modernization”.

In the dream, appeared the reason for the delay too... why the change of the story was delayed so much... had been the scene before we'd actually had to eat together... we had proposed to eat at a restaurant... that was our agreement... but there were some events that impeded us... that's how it happened that we met at that intersection... and because there wasn't time, our table was placed in that pickup van... Father invited us... Father set the table for us... and Father had also surprised us by inviting a large crowd of people to that intersection... a sort of “all roads lead to Rome”... this time all the people from all directions had come at Father's invitation and surprise for us... they had come to our table on the van... well, the platform on the back... there was nothing else in the van... all the shutters of it were down... it was just the table, and you and me at the table together... seemed like a first date table of the two... something desired by everyone... an engagement... something desired by Father.

Before this scene, I had seen these two... me and you... as in a movie... the two lived in mirror apartments... and both seemed to be doing the same things at the same time... a sort of synchronization... she in her apartment... him in his apartment... and each did everything with the other in mind... I was looking from above, as a spectator, the scene... I was looking at both apartments at the same time... that's how the two at one point left to meet... for each in his apartment looked at the other... and they both decided to meet... that's how they got to the table in the pickup van... and everyone was cheering... as if everything had been directed like in a movie made by Father.

But between the time everyone left their apartment... from the middle of a party... there was a party in both apartments... I saw the reason for the delay... I had seen in my dream that Father was having trouble recovering a few of the 144 thousand... that He was fighting with an enemy for them... and that He needed support or assistance in prayer... I had seen that on the donation page, I had written a kind of prayer for the 144 thousand... that it was the only prayer (intercession of priest and emperor) I had to make... because in that prayer was everything... I was also... you were also... was the rest of our loved ones... was the rest of the 144 thousand.

I had started arranging and structuring the prayer, posting (this one) about the 144 thousand... and then we saw ourselves in a crowd... as taken by the wave... we weren't together yet... but we were in the plan to go to that restaurant... so we got caught up in the crowd and ended up at the intersection where Father was... He showed us the table set up on a kind of platform on top of everything.... was the pickup van... was the right time... we sat down to eat at the table... and people have come from all directions... there were many in the streets in all directions, for there was no more place at that intersection... they all started to applaud us... and the first One who started it was Father.

I wanted to make this article longer, to garnish it with three more dreams, but I realize that there is no point in overloading this post with information. I just want to remind you that when I refer to the “change of story” that has apparently been delayed, I am referring to the event that must take place on earth, a kind of “resurrection” of the 144 thousand from a very deep sleep, like the one Adam was in, before Eve was modeled – all the splendor of Paradise.

This event was prophesied by all the prophets, but the most colorful in the love of Love for His sons and daughters was drawn by the prophet Joel: “For I will pour out My Spirit upon every creature; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your elders shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions. I will pour out My Spirit even upon servants and handmaids in those days.” The visionary on the island of Patmos also refers to this event, drawing in his own way the event: “And I heard the number of them that were sealed, 144 thousand of all the tribes of Israel.”

I should mention that this event is totally different from what happened at Pentecost. If the period of the seven Churches began then, this time the period of Israel will begin again, through which once more the One-who-Is will manifest Himself, but this time more gloriously than “Christianity” has been able to do throughout the ages.... yes, for as it is written in all the prophets, the Love of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel will return to His chosen people to show His glory once again... definitively, for after this event we will see the Paradise again.

Because I don't want to be long, I'll just mention two prophecies: “For I am the Lord, and I change not: therefore, ye children of Jacob are not destroyed... They shall be Mine... They will be a special treasure to Me in the day that I prepare; I will have mercy on them as a man has mercy on his son who serves him. And then you will see again the distinction between the righteous and the wicked, between the one who serves God and the one who does not serve Him.” “For the flesh also waits with eager longing for the revelation of the sons of God... but with the hope that it too will be delivered from the bondage of wickedness, that it may share in the glory of the children of God.”

As I told you, I know that a great event will take place in Heaven: the One who manifested Himself as the Lampstand in the midst of the seven Churches, He will take off His robe of Mediator, and He will put on the garments of Redeemer and Avenger (Judge), and the Lampstand will become the Lamb slain in the midst of the twenty-four elders who will then recognize Him as the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David... so it is that the Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Root of David will unseal the book of judgment and will raise from the dead not only four horses with their riders, but also 144 thousand soldiers... with the mission of conquering the whole earth, so that “the earth may be filled with the knowledge of the One-who-Is, as the bottom of the sea with the waters that cover it.”... something that will have never happened until then, for Daniel has written: “But in the days of these kings, the God of Heaven will raise up a kingdom that will never be destroyed.”... first Salem (Peace) in Jerusalem, then Paradise on the whole earth!

“I was looking at these things until some thrones (twenty-four) were seated. And (in the midst of four living creatures) an Ancient of days sat down. His robe was white as snow, and the hair of His head was like pure wool (the Lamb!); His throne (the Lion of the tribe of Judah) was like flames of fire, and His wheels like a flaming fire. A river of fire flowed out before Him. Thousands of thousands of servants served Him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before Him. The judgment (of the Gentiles) was held, and the books were opened (unsealed)... and behold, in the clouds of Heaven (from the East) came (was sent) one like a son of Man (ancient of days); went forth to the Ancient of days (the Root of David) and was brought before Him. To him (David) was given dominion and glory and kingly power, that all peoples and nations and people of all languages might serve him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion and will never pass away and his kingdom will never be destroyed.” because “The saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom and rule the kingdom forever and ever, from everlasting to everlasting.”... yes, “He (David in the midst of the 144 thousand) will rule from sea to sea and from the river to the ends of the earth... Yes, all kings will worship him, all nations will serve him… His name shall endure forever, as long as the sun holds his name. With him shall they bless one another, and all nations shall call him blessed.”

I'm going back to the dream... On that day, the following prayer will be said:

Father, King of all nations and Lord over Your people, You, the One-who-Are the Lion of the tribe of Judah, and You, the One-who-Are the Root of David, please give victory to Your chosen ones and show Your glory in the world, so that all the earth may know that You are the Only true God and that there is no Savior but You... with this truth fill the whole earth as the bottom of the sea is filled with the waters that cover it; to Your glory! Thank you! Amen!

I love you Rose, my love! I miss you so very-very much, I love you with all my being, with every pixel of everything I am!

I feel you sweet, pink, okay... endless beautiful... and even though I've told you a thousand and one times, I promise you... I feel, I think, I know... we have only a few more steps to walk like this.

Although we seemingly had nothing together last year, in reality we walked the path set before us by Love... a path with much love, happiness and fulfillment.... though I appreciated every step of loving you, I couldn't taste every day that we were happy... I think you tasted happiness much more intensely... I was a bit of a boulder... well, until May I was focused on the book... but I could have been happier... I had all the reasons... the fact that you weren't by my side impeded me.

Now I know that only a few blinks separate us... now I know that I've done all that's up to me in relation to the stars, there's not much more I can do... a bit of promo... but without the stars, without a spectacular result! Because I know what the result must be... it must be a worldwide one, or this thing really doesn't depend on me... I can't... I'm too small on the world map... I depend on the stars and their glitter... but what Love from eternity has seen will come to fulfillment... it's the stars' interest more than mine.

I feel the need to put a little dream of stars:

«Tremble before Him, all you inhabitants of the earth! For the world is strengthened and does not waver. Let the heavens rejoice and let the earth be glad. Let it be said among the nations that the Lord reigns!» «Shout for joy to God, all you inhabitants of the earth! Sing praise to His Name, sing praise to His Name, magnify His glory with your praises! Say to God: “How fearful are Your works! Because of the greatness of Your power, Your enemies flatter You. All the earth worships before you and sings to Your praise, sings Your Name.”» (David)

«Blessed be His glorious Name forevermore! Let all the earth be filled with His glory! Amen! Amen!» (Solomon)

«Shout to the Lord with shouts of joy, all you inhabitants of the earth! Shout, shout and sing praises!» «All the kings of the earth will praise you, O Lord, when they hear the words of Your mouth; they will praise the ways of the Lord, for great is the glory of the Lord.» (David)

«Then a branch will come forth from the stem of Jesse (David's father) and a shoot will grow from his roots. The Spirit of the Lord will rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and strength, the Spirit of knowledge and fear of the Lord... There shall be no evil and no harm done in all My holy mountain, for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the bottom of the sea is full of the waters that cover it. In that day the branch of Jesse shall be as a banner to the peoples; the nations shall return to him, and glory shall be his dwelling place.» (Isaiah)

Sorry... the idea is this... never in history have these dreams of Love come true... and now they are unfulfilled more than ever: 2.5 billion are “Christians”, 2 billion are “Muslims”, 1.5 billion are Hindus, 0.5 billion are Buddhists, ... the numbers are not accurate... Europe is increasingly “Muslim”... “Christianity” is more diluted and powerless than ever... today all the earth in true worship is not a reality... and it wasn't in Yeshua's time either, Judea at that time was under Roman and pagan occupation... the earth from Eden was never again «full of the knowledge of the Lord as the bottom of the sea is of the waters that cover it»... when you watch YouTube on “Christian” channels you'll worry when you'll see the aberrations they say about the “Love”... and the same goes for everyone else: “Jews”, “Muslims”, Buddhists, Hindus and whatever... David's dream never came true... but it will come true NOW... I saw in the dream of the ocean the success of the book... big waves, and deep seas... and the beach was full of people, as far as I could see... all over it... the prophecy will be fulfilled: «All the earth worships before You and sings to You, sings Your Name.»

Daniel said: «But in the days of these kings, the Love of Heaven will raise up a kingdom that will never be destroyed and that will not pass under the dominion of another people.»... these things the Love will do NOW for us... you will see!

Please forgive me for filling the message with quotes, I wanted to remind us that we have serious promises from the stars... it's a matter of days before you'll be in my arms... I love you dearly!... and we'll be forever good... infinitely... I know what I'm saying!

I miss you with an eternal longing, as the Love longs for all his children to come to his bosom and embrace them all like a Mother... perhaps we have gone through our grey story with so much separation from each other in love, precisely so that we may understand something of Love's longing for the daughters and sons He desires... as I desire you at my breast... as you desire me at yours... perhaps this is how the Love wanted to weave his longing into three... He included us in his eternal longing... perhaps that's how we could be formed as king and queen... by loving purim (that love in which the face is not seen) like the Love... and through the pain of our separation to understand something of the pain of Love separated from His children... that's how the book was born, from longing and love... to bring all together in Love... beyond all imagination I love you!

I love you my Rose, the beauty and fragrance of flowers in the universe of all that I am... I love you with all my being, without beginning and without ending... because I was born to love you... as you were born to love me, to be loved infinitely: the most beloved queen and baby doll in the world... you'll see... I promise you!... I love you like this, already... and it's just the beginning... a beginning of eternity, a beautiful journey to the End of the Stars... infinity!

I'll stay by your side... let's drink together love like spring water... spring you for me, spring me for you, spring the Love for us.

I love you my sweet Rose... the infinite treasure of my soul... you are my life and everything to me... today, yesterday, tomorrow, infinite!

I'll return... on the chest of the stars with us... on your chest... home... because you are the whole universe of my existence... I exist with love thanks to you... thank you, my love!

Why The Letters of Salem?

Firstly because it was necessary... secondly because the Love itself has been dreaming of them since eternity, has been waiting for them for thousands of years and has prophesied them throughout the history... apparently it sounds like a joke... but it is the pure truth... all the prophets have spoken about them!

When we look back, the Love every time before a semaphore intersection of history has chosen a man as a tool to achieve its purpose: the salvation... the salvation of a group of people, the salvation of a nation, the salvation of a destiny, the salvation of a world... so was a Noah, an Abraham, a Moses, a David, a Solomon... and the list goes on... so it would be absurd to think that things are any different now, when the world is once again at a semaphore intersection.

Just as there was a Noah with an ark, an Abraham with a tent, flocks and an altar, a Moses with a with a staff, a David with a sling, a Solomon with wisdom... so there was chosen an Elias with a book: The Love... from alpha to omega, and the need for this book is illustrated in the ark, in the tent, flocks and altar, in the staff with miracles, in the sling and sword, in experience and wisdom.

We know that without the ark there was no chance for mankind to survive, we know that without Abraham there would have been no chosen people and no salvation, we know that without a staff there would have been no deliverance from bondage and no law to show man what is good, we know that without sling and sword there would have been no kingdom, and without wisdom today we would have no hope... and yet, all this has not brought back the Paradise...

It was necessary for another man to come... without an ark, without a flock, without a staff, without a sword, without being waited for by the wise men of the world... a man... an Elias and a book... the book that brings the Paradise!... because in the Paradise we can enter only by loving... and people don't know how to love anymore... so, the Love has come with a liberating solution from darkness and lies... so from the twinkling of the stars this book was born, The Love... from alpha to omega, a book that can be an ark, and a gathering of sheep in one flock, it can be a staff and a law, it can be a kingdom, it can be the wisdom of the Love!

Thus, without us having planned it beforehand, the need to meet here was born. The Love brings all things through the book... you bring all that Love moves you so that the ark may embrace the world, the flock may drink of spring water, those in captivity to lies may be set free, the lawless may know what is good, the kingless may have a kingdom, the mindless may understand... and all of us thus blessed by the Love may walk again to Paradise... which we have never done before... for at this crossroads where we now stand, we have never been... and neither was the green light at the semaphore.

«I put My words in your mouth and cover you with the shadow of My hand, that I may build new heavens and establish a new earth and say to Zion, 'You are My people!'» «For behold, I am making new heavens and a new earth; so that no one will remember the former things, and no one will remember them.» «For as the new heavens and the new earth which I will make shall stand before Me, so shall your seed and your name stand before Me.»

Today I come with the book... what do you bring?

We know that Noah did not build the ark alone, Abraham did not shepherd his flock alone, Moses did not go alone from Egypt to the promised land, David was not alone when he set up the kingdom, and Solomon was not alone when the House of the Love was built. The Love has always worked through a man in the midst of those who supported him... today you are needed... only together can we build the bridge to the Paradise, each with what he has as a gift at him from the Love...

Today I come with the book... The Letters of Salem.